The purpose of this study was to examine primary appraisal of sexual harassment, that is, a victim's cognitive evaluation of the harassment and the factors that influence this appraisal. The perspectives of 72 female plaintiffs were investigated by measuring their primary appraisal of the event, examining the structure of this appraisal, and assessing the influence of stimulus and individual factors on appraisal. Cluster analysis revealed four distinct emotion clusters: demoralization, anxious arousal, fear, and self-blame. Significant correlations suggest that these four appraisal clusters are differentially related to certain stimulus (e.g., intensity) and individual (e.g., self-esteem, previous victimization, feminist attitudes, and attributions) factors. Theoretical and practical implications for the role of primary appraisal are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerD. D.TerpstraD. E.LarntzK. (1990). The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 22, 305–325
2.
BernaardsC. A.SijtsmaK. (2000). Influence of imputation and EM methods on factor analysis when item nonresponse in questionnaire data is nonignorable. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 321–364
3.
BorgenF. H.BarnettD. C. (1987). Applying cluster analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 456–468
4.
BrooksL.PerotA. R. (1991). Reporting sexual harassment: Exploring a predictive model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 31–47
5.
CollinsworthL. L. (2004). Individual and objective influences on psychological outcomes of sexual harassment: A preliminary examination. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
6.
FitzgeraldL. F.BuchananN. T.CollinsworthL. L.MagleyV. J.RamosA. M. (1999). Junklogic: The abuse defense in sexual harassment litigation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 730–759
7.
FitzgeraldL. F.DrasgowF.HulinC. L.GelfandM. J.MagleyV. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589
8.
FitzgeraldL. F.DrasgowF.MagleyV. J. (1999). Sexual harassment in the armed forces: A test of an integrated model. Military Psychology, 11, 329–343
9.
FitzgeraldL. F.GelfandM. J.DrasgowF. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 425–445
10.
FitzgeraldL. F.HubertL. J. (1987). Multidimensional scaling: Some possibilities for counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 469–480
11.
FitzgeraldL. F.MagleyV. J.SwanS. (1996, March). The in-depth interview schedule: Assessing psychological, organizational, and health-related outcomes for sexual harassment victims. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Women in Psychology, Portland, OR
12.
FitzgeraldL. F.ShullmanS. L.BaileyN.RichardsM.SweckerJ.GoldY. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152–175
13.
FitzgeraldL. F.SwanS.FischerK. (1995). Why didn't she just report him?: The psychological and legal implications of women's responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117–138
14.
FitzgeraldL. F.SwanS.MagleyV. J. (1997). But was it really sexual harassment?: Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In O'DonohueW. (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5–28). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
15.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150–170
16.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S.Dunkel-SchetterC.DeLongisA.GruenR. J. (2000). The dynamics of a stressful encounter. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. (Eds.), Motivational science: Social and personality perspectives (pp.111–127). Ann Arbor, MI: Sheridan Books
17.
FrazierP. A. (1990). Victim attributions and post-rape trauma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 298–304
18.
FrazierP. A.CochranC. C.OlsonA. M. (1995). Social science research on lay definitions of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 21–37
19.
FrazierP. A.SchaubenL. (1994). Causal attributions and recovery from rape and other stressful life events. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 1–14
20.
GelfandM. J.FitzgeraldL. F.DrasgowF. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164–177
21.
GlombT. M.RichmanW. L.HulinC. L.DrasgowF.SchneiderK. T.FitzgeraldL. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 309–328
22.
GruberJ. E.BjornL. (1986). Women's responses to sexual harassment: An analysis of sociocultural, organizational, and personal resource models. Social Science Quarterly, 67, 814–826
23.
HamiltonJ. A.AlagnaS. W.KingL. S.LloydC. (1987). The emotional consequences of gender-based abuse in the workplace: New counseling programs for sex discrimination. Women and Therapy, 6, 155–182
24.
JensenI.GutekB. A. (1982). Attributions and assignment of responsibility for sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 121–136
25.
KinneyT. A. (2003). Themes and perceptions of written sexually harassing messages and their link to distress. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 8–28
26.
KossM. P.GoodmanL. A.BrowneA.FitzgeraldL. F.KeitaG. P.RussoN. F. (Eds.). (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
27.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer
28.
LindemannB.KadueD. D. (1992). Sexual harassment in employment law. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs
29.
MalovichN. J.StakeJ. E. (1990). Sexual harassment on campus: Individual differences in attitudes and beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 63–81
30.
O'ConnellC. E.KorabikK. (2000). Sexual harassment: The relationship of personal vulnerability, work context, perpetrator status, and type of harassment to outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 299–329
31.
PiotrkowskiC. S. (1998). Gender harassment, job satisfaction, and distress among employed white and minority women. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 33–43
32.
ReedM. E. (2004). The psychological impact of sexual harassment and previous victimization in a sample of class action litigants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
33.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
34.
SalisburyJ.GinorioA. B.RemickH.StringerD. M. (1986). Counseling victims of sexual harassment. Psychotherapy, 23, 316–324
35.
SamolukS. B.PrettyG. M. H. (1994). The impact of sexual harassment simulations on women's thoughts and feelings. Sex Roles, 30, 679–697
36.
SchneiderB. (1987). Graduate women, sexual harassment, and university policy. Journal of Higher Education, 58, 46–65
37.
SchneiderK. T.SwanS.FitzgeraldL. F. (1997). Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 401–415
38.
SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. W.GibbonM.FirstM. B. (1990). Structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R, Nonpatient Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press
39.
SwanS. (1995). So what? Why did it bother her? Factors affecting women's subjective appraisal of the severity of sexual harassment experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
40.
SwimJ. K.AikinK. J.HallW. S.HunterB. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214
41.
TerpstraD. E.BakerD. D. (1989). The identification and classification of reactions to sexual harassment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 1–14
42.
U. S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1988). Sexual harassment of federal workers: An update. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office
43.
WeinbergS. L. (1991). Methods, plainly speaking: An introduction to multidimensional scaling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 24, 12–34
44.
WeinerR. L.WattsB. A.GoldkampK. H.GasperC. (1995). Social analytic investigation of hostile work environments. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 263–280
45.
WilsonF. (2000). The subjective experiences of sexual harassment: Cases of students. Human Relations, 53, 1081–1097
