Religious leaders from Jewish, Christian, and Islamic faiths were interviewed about their understanding of the intersection of intimate partner violence (IPV) and religion, and a grounded-theory analysis was conducted. The present manuscript explored the leaders' beliefs about the partners' responsibility for IPV and the role of divorce. Although religious leaders tended to place greater responsibility for abuse on the perpetrator, most also thought women bore some responsibility—either for inciting abuse or for not leaving the situation. Although there was diversity in beliefs, most of the leaders expressed concerns related to balancing the sacredness of marriage with the urgency of divorce in cases of IPV. Many suggested that divorce be considered as a “last resort” and would urge reconciliation if possible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanM. (2000). Divorce-related domestic violence in IsraelViolence Against Women, 6, 1223–1254
2.
AlsdurfJ. M. (1985). Wife abuse and Christian faith: An assessment of the church's response Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena, CA
3.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic reviewPsychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680
4.
Beaman-HallL.Nason-ClarkN. (1997). Partners or protagonists? The transition house movement and conservative churchesAffilia, 12 (2), 176–186
5.
BrinkerhoffM. B.GrandinE.LupriE. (1992). Religious involvement and spousal violence: The Canadian caseJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31, 15–31
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2003). Crime Data Brief, Intimate Partner Violence, 1993-2001, National Institute of Justice
7.
CaplanP. J. (1985). The myth of women s masochismNew York: Dutton
8.
CunradiC. B.CaetanoR.ShaferJ. (2002). Religious affiliation, denominational homogamy, and intimate partner violence among U. Scouples. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 139–151
9.
DixonC. K. (1995). Violence in families: The development of a program to enable clergy to provide supportJournal of Family Studies, 1, 14–23
10.
EhrensaftM. K.CohenP.BrownJ.SmailesE.HenianC.JohnsonJ. G. (2003). Intergenerational transmission of partner violence: A 20-year prospective studyJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 741–753
11.
EllisonC. G.AndersonK. L. (2001). Religious involvement and domestic violence among U. S. couplesJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 269–286
12.
EllisonC. G.BartowskiJ. P.AndersonK. L. (1999). Are there religious variations in domestic violence?Journal of Family Issues, 20, 87–113
13.
EriksonV (1993). Where silence speaks: Feminism, social theory, and religionMinneapolis, MN: Fortress Press
14.
FortuneM. M. (1987). Keeping the faith: Guidance for Christian women facing abuseSan Francisco: HarperCollins
15.
FoxJ. A. (1996). Uniform crime reports [United States]: Supplementary Homocide Reports, 1976-1994Boston: Northeastern University, College of Criminal Justice [producer]; Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]
16.
GiesbrechtN.SevcikI. (2000). The process of recovery and rebuilding among abused women in the conservative evangelical subcultureJournal of Family Violence, 15, 229–248
17.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative researchNew York: Aldine de Gruyter
18.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2000). Implications of wife abuse and battering for self-esteem, depression, and anxiety as revealed by the Second Palestinian National Survey on Violence Against WomenJournal of Family Issues, 21, 435–463
19.
Hassouneh-PhillipsD. S. (2001). “Marriage is half of faith and the rest is fear of Allah”: Marriage and spousal abuse among American MuslimsViolence Against Women, 7, 927–946
20.
HawleyJ. S. (Ed.)., (1994). Fundamentalism and genderNew York: Oxford University Press
21.
HetheringtonM. E.Stanley-HaganM. (1999). The adjustment of children with divorced parents: A risk and resiliency perspectiveJournal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 40, 129–140
22.
HotalingG. T.SugarmanD. B. (1990). A risk marker analysis of assaulted wivesJournal of Family Violence, 5, 1–13
23.
HumphreysJ. (2002). Spirituality and distress in sheltered battered womenJournal of Nursing Scholarship, 32, 273–278
24.
JekielekS. M. (1998). Parental conflict, marital dissolution, and children's emotional well-beingSocial Forces, 76, 905–935
25.
KnickmeyerN.LevittH. M.HorneS. G.BayerG. (2003). Responding to mixed messages and double binds: Religious oriented coping strategies of Christian battered womenJournal of Religion and Abuse, 5, 55–82
26.
KnickmeyerN.LevittH. M.HorneS. G.BayerG. (2005). Putting on Sunday best: The silencing of battered women within Christian faith communities Unpublished manuscript
27.
LevittH.WareK. (in press). “Anything with two heads is a monster”: Religious leaders perspectives on marital equality and domestic violence. Violence Against Women
28.
MagdolL.MoffitT. E.CaspiA.NewmanD. L.FaganJ.SilvaP. A. (1997). Gender differences in partner violence in a birth cohort of 21-year-olds: Bridging the gap between clinical and epidemiological approachesJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 68–78
29.
McClureJ.RamsayN. (Eds.)., (1998). Telling the truth: Preaching about sexual and domestic violenceCleveland, OH: United Church Press
30.
McCulloughM. (1999). Research on religion-accommodative counseling: Review and meta-analysisJournal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 92–98
31.
PargamentK. I. (1990). God help me: Toward a theoretical frame-work of coping for the psychology of religionJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 2, 195–224
32.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
33.
ReedJ. S. (1981). Below the Smith and Wesson line: Reflections on southern violence In BlackM.ReedJ. S., (Eds.), Perspectives on the American South (pp. 9–22). New York: Cordon & Breach
34.
RennieD. L. (2000). Grounded theory methodology as methodological hermeneutics: Reconciling realism and relativismTheory and Psychology, 10, 481–502
35.
RennieD. L.PhillipsJ. R.QuartaroG. K. (1988). Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology?Canadian Psychology, 29, 139–150
36.
SimonT. R.AndersonM.ThompsonM. P.CrowbyA. E.ShelleyG.SacksJ. J. (2001). Attitudinal acceptance of intimate partner violence among United States adultsViolence and Victims, 16, 15–126
37.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women SurveyViolence Against Women, 6, 142–161
38.
WareK. N.LevittH. M.BayerG. (2003). May God help you: Faith leaders' perspectives of intimate partner violence within their communitiesJournal of Religion and Abuse, 5, 29–54
39.
WoodA. D.McHughM. C. (1994). Woman battering: The response of clergyPastoral Psychology, 42, 185–196
