This study used a feminist psychodynamic developmental framework to test the hypothesis that internalizing conventional femininity ideologies in two domains—inauthenticity in relationships and body objectification—is associated with early adolescent girls' mental health. One hundred forty-eight eighth-grade girls completed measures of femininity ideology, self-esteem, depression, and demographic characteristics. In the first part of this study, we refined the Adolescent Femininity Ideology Scale originally developed by Tolman and Porche (2000). In the second part, we used structural equation modeling to test models linking femininity ideology to mental health. Results revealed that body objectification, and to a lesser extent, inauthenticity in relationships, accounted for half of the variance in depression and over two-thirds of the variance in self-esteem in a critical period of development for adolescent girls. The importance of a feminist psychodynamic developmental framework for identifying and understanding salient dimensions of female adolescence is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartkyS. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.
2.
BelenkyM. F.ClinchyB. M.GoldbergerN. R.TaruleJ. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
3.
BemS. L. (1981). Bem Sex Role Inventory professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
4.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
5.
BordoS. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6.
BrownL. M. (1998). Raising their voices: The politics of girls' anger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BrownL. M. (2001). White working class girls, femininities, and the paradox of resistance. In TolmanD.Brydon-MillerM. (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretive and participatory methods (pp. 95–110). New York: New York University Press.
8.
BrownL. M.GilliganC. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women's psychology and girls' development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BrumbergJ. J. (1997). The body project: An intimate history of American girls. New York: Random House.
10.
ChuJ. Y.PorcheM. V.TolmanD. L. (2005). The adolescent masculinity ideology in relationships scale: Development and validation of a new measure for boys. Men and Masculinities, 8 (1), 93–115.
11.
CrossS. E.MadsonL. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.
12.
DeauxK.MajorB. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.
13.
de BeauvoirS. (1961). The second sex. New York: Bantam Books.
14.
DuBoisD. L.TevendaleH. D.Burk-BraxtonC.SwensonL. P.HardestyJ. L. (2000). Self-system influences during early adolescence: Investigation of an integrative model. Journal of Early Adolescence, 20, 12–43.
15.
EntwisleD. R.AstoneN. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth's race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development, 65, 1521–1540.
16.
EricksonE. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.
17.
FenzelL. M. (2000). Prospective study of changes in global self-worth and strain during the transition to middle school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 20, 93–116.
18.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
19.
FredericksonB. L.RobertsT-A.NollS. M.QuinnD. M.TwengeJ. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.
20.
FriereP. (1970). Pedogogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
21.
GalambosN. L.LeadbeaterB. J.BarkerE. T. (2004). Gender differences in and risk factors for depression in adolescence: A 4-year longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 16–25.
22.
GilliganC. (1982). A different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
GilliganC.RogersA. G.TolmanD. L. (Eds.). (1991). Women, girls and psychotherapy: Reframing resistance. New York: Haworth.
24.
HarterS.MaroldD. B.WhitesellN. R.CobbsG. (1996). A model of the effects of parent and peer support on adolescent false self behaviorChild Development, 67, 160–174.
25.
HarterS.WatersP. L.PettittL.WhitesellN. R.KofkinJ.JordanJ. (1997). Autonomy and connectedness as dimensions of adult relationship styles. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 147–164.
26.
HarterS.WatersP. L.WhitesellN. R. (1997). Lack of voice as a manifestation of false self-behavior among adolescents: The school setting as a stage upon which the drama of authenticity is enacted. Educational Psychologist, 32, 153–173.
27.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
28.
HuurreT.AroH.RahkonenO. (2003). Well-being and health behavior by parental socioeconomic status: A follow-up study of adolescents aged 16 until age 32 years. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 249–255.
29.
JackD. C.DillD. (1992). The silencing the self scale: Schemas of intimacy associated with depression in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 97–106.
30.
JaggerA. M. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
31.
JordanJ. V.KaplanA. G.MillerJ. B.StiverI. P.SurreyJ. L. (1991). Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford.
32.
JöreskogK.SörbomD. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
KaplanH. B.LinC. (2000). Deviant identity as a moderator of the relation between negative self-feelings and deviant behavior. Journal of Early Adolescence, 20, 150–177.
36.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, second edition. New York: Guilford.
37.
KlingK. C.HydeJ. S.ShowersC. J.BuswellB. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470–500.
LeaperC. (2000). The social construction and socialization of gender during development. In MillerP. H.Kofsky-ScholmickE. (Eds.), Toward a feminist developmental psychology (pp. 127–152). Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
40.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.
41.
McCrearyD. R.SasseD. K. (2000). An exploration of the drive for muscularity in adolescent boys and girls. Journal of American College Health, 48, 297–304.
42.
McKinleyN. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates body esteem: The mediating effect of objectified boy consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 19, 113–123.
43.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.
44.
MillerJ. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.
45.
MuehlenkampJ. J.Saris-BaglamaR. N. (2002). Self objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 371–379.
46.
Nolen-HoeksemaS.GirgusJ. S. (1994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 424–443.
47.
NollS. M.FredericksonB. L. (1998). A mediational modeling linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.
48.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.
OlivardiaR.PopeH. G.BorowieckiJ. J.CohaneG. H. (2004). Biceps and body image: The relationship between muscularity and self-esteem, depression and eating disorder symptoms. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5, 112–120.
50.
PetersonA. C.CompasB. E.Brooks-GunnJ.StemmlerM.EyS.GrantK. E. (1993). Depression in adolescence. American Psychologist, 48, 155–168.
51.
PetersonA. C.SarigianiP. A.KennedyR. E. (1991). Adolescent depression: Why more girls?Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20, 247–271.
52.
PleckJ. H.SonensteinF. L.KuL. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males' heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 11–29.
53.
PollackW. S.ShusterT. (2000). Real boys' voices. New York: Penguin.
54.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
ScheierL. M.BotvinG. J.GriffinK. W.DiazT. (2000). Dynamic growth models of self-esteem and adolescent alcohol use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 20, 178–209.
56.
SlaterA.TiggemannM. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343–349.
57.
SmolakL.MunstertiegerB. F. (2002). The relationship of gender and voice to depression and eating disorders. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 234–241.
58.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. (1972). The Attitudes Towards Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes towards the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 624–635.
59.
SticeE.HaywardC.CameronR. P.KillenJ. D.TaylorC. B. (2000). Body-image and eating disturbances predict onset of depression among female adolescents: A longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 438–444.
60.
SurreyJ. L. (1991). The self-in-relation: A theory of women's development. In JordanJ. V. (Eds.), Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center (pp. 51–66). New York: Guilford.
61.
TaylorJ. M.GilliganC.SullivanA. M. (1995). Between voice and silence: Women and girls, race and relationship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
ThomasD. L.CarverC. (1990). Religion and adolescent social competence. In GullottaT. P.AdamsG. R. (Eds.), Developing social competency in adolescence (pp. 195–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
ThompsonJ. M. (1995). Silencing the self: Depressive symptomatology and close relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 337–353.
64.
TiggemannM.SlaterA. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64.
65.
TolmanD. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
TolmanD. L.DeboldE. (1993). Conflicts of body and image: Female adolescents, desire, and the no-body body. In FallonP.KatzmanM.WooleyS. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on eating disorders (pp. 301–317). New York: Guilford.
67.
TolmanD. L.PorcheM. V. (2000). The Adolescent Femininity Ideology Scale: Development and validation of a new measure for girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 365–376.
68.
TolmanD. L.SpencerR.HarmonT.Rosen-ReynosoM.StriepeM. (2004). Getting close, staying cool: Early adolescent boys' experiences with romantic relationships. In WayN.ChuJ. Y. (Eds.), Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood (pp. 235–255). New York: New York University Press.
69.
TwengeJ. M.CrockerJ. (2002). Race and self-esteem: Meta-analyses comparing Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians and comment on Gray-Little and Hafdahl (2000). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 371–408.
70.
TwengeJ. M.Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2002). Age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, and birth cohort differences on the Children's Depression Inventory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 578–588.
71.
WayN. (1998). Everyday courage: Lives and stories of urban teenagers. New York: New York University Press.
72.
WilliamsJ. M.CurrieC. (2000). Self-esteem and physical development in early adolescence: Pubertal timing and body image. Journal of Early Adolescence, 20, 129–149.
