Deficits theory posits that women scientists have not yet achieved parity with men scientists because of structural aspects of the scientific environment that provide them with fewer opportunities and more obstacles than men. The current study of 208 faculty women scientists tested this theory by examining the effect of personal negative experiences and perceptions of the workplace climate on job satisfaction, felt influence, and productivity. Hierarchical multiple regression results indicated that women scientists experiencing more sexual harassment and gender discrimination reported poorer job outcomes. Additionally, perceptions of a generally positive, nonsexist climate, as well as effective leadership, were related to positive job outcomes after controlling for harassment and discrimination. We discuss implications for the retention and career success of women in academic science.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
American Sociological Association. (2005, February 28). Statement of the American Sociological Association Council on the causes of gender differences in science and math career achievement: Harvard's Lawrence Summers and the ensuing public debate. Retrieved November 30, 2005 from http://asanet.org/page.ww?section=Issue+Statements&nam==Statement+on+Summers
3.
BensimonE. M.WardK.SandersK. (2000). The department chair's role in developing new faculty into teachers and scholars. Bolton, MA: Anker.
4.
BetzL. (1994). The University of Michigan Medical School: Report of the faculty survey. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
5.
BirdS.LittJ.WangY. (2004). Creating status of women reports: Institutional housekeeping as “women's work.”NWSA Journal, 16(1), 194–206.
6.
CarollL.EllisK. L. (1989). Faculty attitudes toward sexual harassment: Survey results, survey process. Initiatives: Journal of the National Association for Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors, 52, 35–41.
7.
CarrJ. Z.SchmidtA. M.FordJ. K.DeShonR. P. (2003b). Climate perceptions matter: A meta-analytic path analysis relating molar climate, cognitive and affective states, and individual level work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 605–619.
8.
CarrP. L.SzalachaL.BarnettR.CaswellC.InuiT. (2003a). A “Ton of Feathers”: Gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it. Journal of Women's Health, 12(10), 1009–1018.
9.
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education (CSHPE) & Center for the Education of Women (CEW). (1999). University of Michigan work-life study report. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
10.
ColeJ. R.ZuckermanH. (1991). Marriage, motherhood, and research performance. In ZuckermanH.ColeJ. R.BrunerJ. T. (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (pp. 157–170). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
CortinaL. M.FitzgeraldL. F.DrasgowF. (2002). Contextualizing Latina experiences of sexual harassment: Preliminary tests of a structural model. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(4), 295–311.
12.
CortinaL. M.MagleyV. J.WilliamsJ. H.LanghoutR. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64–80.
13.
DipboyeR. L.HalversonS. K. (2004). Subtle (and not so subtle) discrimination in organizations. In GriffinR. W.O'Leary-KellyA. M. (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 131–158). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
DonovanM. A.DrasgowF.MunsonL. J. (1998). The perceptions of Fair Interpersonal Treatment Scale: Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 683–692.
15.
FitzgeraldL. F. (1996). Sexual harassment: The definition and measurement of a construct. In PaludiM. A. (Ed.), Sexual harassment on college campuses: Abusing the ivory power (pp. 21–44). Albany, NY: University of New York Press.
16.
FitzgeraldL. F.DrasgowF.HulinC. L.GelfandM. J.MagleyV. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.
17.
FitzgeraldL. F.DrasgowF.MagleyV. J. (1999). Sexual harassment in the Armed Forces: A test of an integrated model. Military Psychology, 11(3), 329–343.
18.
GlombT. M.RichmanW. L.HulinC. L.DrasgowF.SchneiderK. T.FitzgeraldL. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71(3), 309–328.
19.
GrauerholzE. (1996). Sexual harassment in the academy: The case of women professors. In StockdaleM. S. (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies (pp. 29–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
HarrellS. P. (2000). A multidimensional conceptualization of racism-related stress: Implications for the well-being of people of color. American Journal of Ortho-psychiatry, 70, 42–57.
21.
Hesson-McInnisM. S.FitzgeraldL. F. (1997). Sexual harassment: A preliminary test of an integrative model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(10), 877–901.
22.
HigginsM. C.ThomasD. A. (2001). Constellations and careers: Toward understanding the effects of multiple developmental relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 223–247.
23.
HostlerS.GressardR. (1993). Appendix 3C: Gender fairness environment scale [developed by the University of Virginia School of Medicine Committee on Women]. Perceptions of the medical education environment. The Journal of the American Medical Women's Association, 48, 51–54.
24.
HulinC. L.FitzgeraldL. F.DrasgowF. (1996). Organizational influences on sexual harassment. In StockdaleM. S. (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies (pp. 127–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
HurtadoS. (1998). Texas A & M University campus climate survey: A study of faculty views and experiences. CSHPE, School of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
26.
IliesR.HausermanN.SchwochauS.StibalJ. (2003). Reported incidence rates of work-related sexual harassment in the United States: Using meta-analysis to explain reported rate disparities. Personnel Psychology, 56, 607–631.
27.
JohnsonJ. J.McIntyeC. L. (1998). Organizational culture and climate correlates of job satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 82(3), 843–850.
28.
JoyceW.SlocumJ. W.Jr.Von GlinowM. A. (1982). Person-situation interaction: Competing models of fit. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 3, 265–280.
29.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
30.
KickulJ.Liao-TrothM. A. (2003). The meaning behind the message: Climate perceptions and the psychological contract. Mid-American Journal of Business, 18(2), 23–32.
31.
KissmanK. (1990). Women in blue-collar occupations: An exploration of constraints and facilitators. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 17(3), 139–149.
32.
KohlstedtS. G. (2004). Sustaining gains: Reflections on women in science and technology in 20th-century United States. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 1–26.
33.
KossM. P.GoodmanL. A.BrowneA.FitzgeraldL. F.KeitaG. P.RussoN. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34.
MagleyV. J.WaldoC. R.DrasgowF.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). The impact of sexual harassment on military personnel: Is it the same for men and women?Military Psychology, 11(3), 283–302.
35.
MansfieldP. K.KochP. B.HendersonJ.VicaryJ. R.CohnM.YoungE. W. (1991). The job climate for women in traditionally male blue-collar occupations. Sex Roles, 25(1/2), 63–79.
36.
Miner-RubinoK.CortinaL. M. (2004). Working in a context of hostility toward women: Implications for employees' well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(2), 107–122.
37.
MurrellA. J.OlsonJ. E.FriezeI. H. (1995). Sexual harassment and gender discrimination: A longitudinal study of women managers. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 139–149.
38.
National Science Foundation. (2000). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2000 (NSF 00-327). Arlington, VA: Author.
39.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2004). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2004 (NSF 04-317). Arlington, VA: Author.
40.
NewellC. E.RosenfeldP.CulbertsonA. L. (1995). Sexual harassment experiences and equal opportunity perceptions of Navy women. Sex Roles, 32(3/4), 159–168.
41.
NiemeierD. A.GonzalezC. (2004). Breaking into the Guild-masters' Club: What we know about women science and engineering department chairs at AAU universities. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 157–171.
42.
OffermannL. R.MalamutA. B. (2002). When leaders harass: The impact of target perceptions of organizational leadership and climate on harassment reporting and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 885–893.
43.
O'Leary-KellyA. M.PaetzoldR. L.GriffinR. W. (2000). Sexual harassment as aggressive behavior: An actor-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 372–388.
44.
PaetzoldR. L. (2004). Sexual harassment as dysfunctional behavior in organizations. In GriffinR. W.O'Leary-KellyA. M. (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 159–186). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45.
PattersonM.WarrP.WestM. (2004). Organizational climate and company productivity: The role of employee affect and employee level. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 193–216.
46.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
47.
PrestonA. E. (2004). Leaving science: Occupational exit from scientific careers. New York: Russell Sage.
48.
RaginsB. R.ScanduraT. A. (1995). Antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment: An empirical investigation of competing hypotheses. Sex Roles, 32(7/8), 429–455.
49.
RigerS.StokesJ.RajaS.SullivanM. (1997). Measuring perceptions of the work environment for faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 63–78.
50.
RipleyA. (1995). Who says a woman can't be Einstein?Time, 165, 51–59.
51.
SchneiderK. T.SwanS.FitzgeraldL. F. (1997). Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 401–415.
52.
SeibertS. E.SilverS. R.RandolphW. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332–349.
53.
SettlesI. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 487–500.
54.
SonnertG. (1995). Gender equity in science: Still an elusive goal. Issues in Science and Technology, 12(2), 53–58.
55.
SonnertG.HoltonG. (1996). Career patterns of women and men in the sciences. American Scientist, 84(1), 63–71.
56.
SourdifJ. (2004). Predictors of nurses' intent to stay at work in a university health center. Nursing and Health Sciences, 6, 59–68.
57.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1994). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace. Washington, DC: Author.
58.
ValianV. (2004). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 207–220.
59.
ValianV (2005, January 30). Raise your hand if you're a woman in science. The Washington Post, B01.
60.
WagarT. H. (1997). Is labor-management climate important? Some Canadian evidence. Journal of Labor Research, 18(1), 163–174.
61.
WilliamsC. L. (1999). Real-life sexual harassment. In HertzR.GlassnerB. (Eds.), Qualitative sociology as everyday life (pp. 49–57). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute, University of Wisconsin. (2005). Response to Lawrence Summers' remarks on women in science. Retrieved March 23, 2005 from http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/news/LawrenceSummers_Response.pdf.
63.
WrightA. L.SchwindtL. A.BassfordT. L.ReynaV. F.ShisslakC. M.St. GermainP. A. (2003). Gender differences in academic advancement: Patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one U.S. college of medicine. Academic Medicine, 78(5), 500–508.
64.
WyerM.BarbercheckM.GeismanD.OzturkH. O.WayneM. (2001). Women, science, and technology: A reader in feminist science studies. New York: Routledge.
65.
XieY.ShaumanK. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
YoderJ. D.AniakudoP. (1996). When pranks become harassment: The case of African American women firefighters. Sex Roles, 35(5/6), 253–270.
67.
ZeitzG. (1990). Age and work satisfaction in a government agency: A situational perspective. Human Relations, 43(5), 419–438.
