We explored sociocultural, feminist, and psychological influences on women's body dissatisfaction by examining the manner in which awareness and internalization of appearance standards, feminist ideology, and self-esteem affect body dissatisfaction. A main goal of the study was to test a model of potential protective mechanisms against internalization of appearance standards. The LISREL 8.5 program was used to perform structural modeling analyses on the proposed theoretical models. The results supported previous findings regarding the influential role of sociocultural variables on women's body dissatisfaction. In particular, internalization was found to mediate the relationship between awareness and body dissatisfaction. Feminist ideology and self-esteem were not found to serve as protective mechanisms against internalization. However, self-esteem appeared to directly affect body dissatisfaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbellS. C.RichardsM. H. (1996). The relationship between body shape satisfaction and self-esteem: An investigation of gender and class differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 691–703.
2.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
3.
BargadA.HydeJ. S. (1991). Women's studies: A study of feminist identity development in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 181–201.
4.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
5.
BlasovichJ.TomakaJ. (1991). Measures of self-esteem. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 114–160). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
BrownT. A.CashT. F.MikulkaP. J. (1990). Attitudinal body-image assessment: Factor analysis of the Body-Self Relations Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 135–144.
7.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
CarlockC. J. (1999). Body and self-esteem. In CarlockC. J. (Ed.), Enhancing self-esteem (3rd ed.; pp. 203–247). Ann Arbor, MI: Taylor & Francis.
9.
CashT. F. (1990). The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire. Unpublished test manual, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA. (Available on request from author.).
10.
CashT. F.AncisJ. R.StrachanM. D. (1997). Gender attitudes, feminist identity, and body images among college women. Sex Roles, 36, 433–447.
11.
CashT. F.LabargeA. S. (1996). Development of the Appearance Schemas Inventory: A new cognitive body-image assessment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20, 37–50.
12.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indices for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
13.
CooperP. J.TaylorM. J.CooperZ.FairburnC. G. (1987). The development and validation of the Body Shape Questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 6, 485–494.
14.
CoopersmithS. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freedman.
15.
CowanG.MestlinM.MasekJ. (1992). Predictors of feminist self-labeling. Sex Roles, 27, 321–330.
16.
CusumanoD. L.ThompsonJ. K. (1997). Body image and body shape ideals in magazines: Exposure, awareness, and internalization. Sex Roles, 37, 701–721.
17.
CuttanceP. (1987). Issues and problems in the application of structural equation models. In CuttanceP.EcobR. (Eds.), Structural modeling by example: Applications in educational, sociological, and behavioral research (pp. 241–279). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
DelaneyM. E.O'KeefeL. D.SkeneK. M. (1997). Development of a sociocultural measure of Young Women's Experiences with Body Shape. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 63–80.
19.
DeManA. F.BenoitR. (1982). Self-esteem in feminist and nonfeminist French-Canadian women and French-Canadian men. Journal of Psychology, 111, 3–7.
20.
DionneM.DavisC.FoxJ.GurevichM. (1995). Feminist ideology as a predictor of body dissatisfaction in women. Sex Roles, 33, 277–287.
21.
DowningN. E.RoushK. L. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 695–709.
22.
FassingerR. E. (1994). Development and testing of the Attitudes Toward Feminism and the Women's Movement (FWM) Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 389–402.
23.
FinchJ. F.WestS. G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: Statistical methods. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 439–485.
24.
FinchJ. F.WestS. G.MacKinnonD. P. (1997). Effects of sample size and nonnormality on the estimation of mediated effects in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 87–107.
25.
FranzoiS. L.ShieldsS. A. (1984). The Body Esteem Scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 173–178.
26.
FreedmanR. (1990). Cognitive-behavioral perspectives on body-image change. In CashT. F.PruzinskyT. (Eds.), Body images: Development, deviance, and change (pp. 272–295). New York: Guilford Press.
27.
GilbertS.ThompsonJ. K. (1996). Feminist explanations of the development of eating disorders: Common themes, research findings, and methodological issues. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 183–202.
28.
GleavesD. H.WilliamsonD. H.EberenzK. P.SebastianS. B.BarkerS. E. (1995). Clarifying body-image disturbance: Analysis of a multidimensional model using structural equation modeling. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 478–493.
29.
HarrisonK.CantorJ. (1997). The relationship between media consumption and eating disorders. Journal of Communication, 47, 40–67.
30.
HeinbergL. J. (1996). Theories of body image disturbance: Perceptual, developmental, and sociocultural factors. In ThompsonJ. K. (Ed.), Body image, eating disorders, and obesity: An integrative guide for assessment and treatment (pp. 27–47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31.
HeinbergL. J.ThompsonJ. K. (1995). Body image and televised images of thinness and attractiveness: A controlled laboratory investigation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 325–338.
32.
HeinbergL. J.ThompsonJ. K.StormerS. (1995). Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 81–89.
33.
Henderson-KingD.StewartA. J. (1997). Feminist consciousness: Perspectives on Women's Experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 415–426.
34.
IrvingL. M. (1990). Mirror images: Effects of the standard of beauty on the self- and body-esteem of women exhibiting varying levels of bulimic symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 230–242.
35.
JaccardJ.WanC. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
JerabekI. (1996). Self-esteem Inventory. Body-Mind Queen-Dom. Retrieved October 15, 1999, from http://www.queendom.com/selfest.html.
37.
JonssonF. Y. (1998). Modeling interaction and nonlinear effects: A step-by-step LISREL example. In SchumackerR. E.MarcoulidesG. A. (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 17–42). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbauam.
KelsonT. R.Kearney-CookeA.LanskyL. M. (1990). Body image and body-beautification among female college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 281–289.
40.
MintzL. B.BetzN. E. (1988). Prevalence and correlates of eating disordered behaviors among undergraduate women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4, 463–471.
41.
MorganB. L. (1996). Putting the feminism into the feminism scales: Introduction of a Liberal Feminist Attitude and Ideology Scale. Sex Roles, 34, 359–390.
42.
MyaskovskyL.WittigM. A. (1997). Predictors of feminist social identity among college women. Sex Roles, 37, 861–883.
43.
PetrieT. A.RogersR.JohnsonC.DiehlN. (1996). Development and validation of the Beliefs About Attractiveness Scale—Revised. Paper presented at the 104th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
44.
PosavacH. D.PosavacS. S.PosavacE. J. (1998). Exposure to media images of female attractiveness and concern with body weight among young women. Sex Roles, 38, 187–201.
45.
RenzettiC. M. (1987). New wave or second stage? Attitudes of college women toward feminism. Sex Roles, 16, 265–277.
46.
RickardK. M. (1987). Feminist identity development: Scale development and initial validation studies. Paper presented at the Association for Women in Psychology, Denver, Colorado.
47.
RigdonE. E.SchumackerR. E.WothkeW. (1998). A comparative review of interaction and nonlinear modeling. In SchumackerR. E. (Ed.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
RosenJ. C. (1990). Body-image disturbances in eating disorders. In CashT. F.PruzinskyT. (Eds.). Body images: Development, deviance, and change (pp. 190–214). New York: Guilford Press.
49.
RosenJ. C.JonesA.RamirezE.WaxmanS. (1996). Body Shape Questionnaire: Studies of validity and reliability. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20, 315–319.
50.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
SilversteinB.CarpmanS.PerlickD.PerdueL. (1990). Nontraditional sex-role aspirations, gender identity conflict, and disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 23, 687–695.
52.
SladeP. D.DeweyM. E.NewtonT.BrodieD.KiemleG. (1990). Development and preliminary validation of the Body Satisfaction Scale (BSS). Psychology and Health, 4, 499–509.
53.
SnyderR.HasbrouckL. (1996). Feminist identity, gender traits, and symptoms of disturbed eating among college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 593–598.
54.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
55.
SpitzerB. L.HendersonK. A.ZivianM. T. (1999). Gender differences in population versus media body sizes: A comparison over four decades. Sex Roles, 40, 545–565.
56.
SticeE.Schupak-NeubergE.ShawH. E.SteinR. I. (1994). Relation of media exposure to eating disorder symptomatology: An examination of mediating mechanisms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 836–840.
57.
Streigel-MooreR. H.SilbersteinL. R.GrunbergN. E.RodinJ. (1990). Competing on all fronts: Achievement orientation and disordered eating. Sex Roles, 23, 697–702.
58.
ThompsonJ. K.PennerL. A.AltabeM. N. (1990). Procedures, problems, and progress in the assessment of body images. In CashT. F.PruzinskyT. (Eds.), Body images: Development, deviance, and change (pp. 21–48). New York: Guilford Press.
59.
ThomsenC. J.BasuA. M.ReinitzM. T. (1995). Effects of women's studies courses on gender-related attitudes of women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 419–426.
60.
TiggemannM.PickeringA. S. (1996). Role of television in adolescent women's body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20, 199–203.
61.
TwamleyE. W.DavisM. C. (1999). The sociocultural model of eating disturbance in young women: The effects of personal attributes and family environment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 467–489.
62.
WilliamsT. L.GleavesD. H.Cepeda-BenitoA.ErathS. A.CororveM. B. (2001). The reliability and validity of a group administered version of the Body Image Assessment. Assessment, 8, 37–46.
63.
WilliamsonD. A.DavisC. J.BennettS. M.GorecznyA. J.GleavesD. H. (1989). Development of a simple procedure for assessing body image disturbance. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 433–446.
