Does the quality of same-sex friendship depend on the gender of the friends and the balance of power between friends? Fifty-four men and 60 women undergraduates evaluated two of their same-sex friendships, one equal in power and one unequal in power. The quality of each friendship was rated in terms of emotional closeness, satisfaction, liking, self-disclosure, and rewards. In general, most young adults evaluated their friendships positively. Mixed-model multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVAs) found significant main effects of gender and power on ratings of quality, but no interactions. Consistent with previous research, women generally evaluated their same-sex friendships more positively than did men. Gender differences were relatively small in magnitude and were not found for all indices of relationship quality, however. As predicted, participants rated equal-power friendships significantly higher than unequal-power friendships on all measures of quality. Power appears to be an important but largely neglected element of friendship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsR. GBliesznerR. (1994). An integrative conceptual framework for friendship research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 163–184.
2.
AllanG. (1986). Friendships and care for elderly people. Ageing and Society, 6, 1–12.
3.
BliesznerRAdamsR. G. (1992). Adult friendship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
5.
DavidsonL. RDubermanL. (1982). Friendship: Communication and interactional patterns in same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 8, 809–822.
6.
DuckSWrightP. H. (1993). Reexamining gender differences in same-gender friendships: A close look at two lands of data. Sex Roles, 28, 709–727.
7.
FoaUFoaU. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
8.
HaysR. B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909–924.
9.
HaysR. B. (1988). Friendship. In DuckS.W. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 391–408). New York: Wiley.
10.
HenleyN. M. (1977). Body politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11.
HillC. TRubinZPeplauL. AWillardS. G. (1979). The volunteer couple: Sex differences, couple commitment and participation in research on interpersonal relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 415–420.
12.
HustonT. L. (1983). Power. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson, Close relationships (pp. 169–219). New York: W. H. Freeman.
13.
JonesD. C. (1991). Friendship satisfaction and gender: An examination of sex differences in contributors to friendship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 167–185.
14.
KarweitNHansellS. (1983). Sex differences in adolescent relationships: Friendship and status. In EpsteinJ.L.KarweitN. (Eds.), Friends in school: Patterns of selection and influence in secondary schools (pp. 115–130). New York: Academic Press.
15.
LewisR. JWinsteadB. ADerlegaV. J. (1989). Gender differences in volunteering for friendship research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 623–632.
16.
McWilliamsSBlumsteinP. (1991). Evaluative hierarchy in personal relationships. In LawlerE.J.MarkovskyB.RidgewayC.WalkerH. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 8, pp. 67–88). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
17.
MillerL. CBergJ. HArcherR. L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234–1244.
18.
MillerL. CKennyD. A. (1986). Reciprocity of self-disclosure at the individual and dyadic levels: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 713–719.
19.
MurrayS. LHolmesJ. G. (1996). The construction of relationship realities. In FletcherG.O.FitnessJ. (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 91–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
ParkerSdeVriesB. (1993). Patterns of friendship for women and men in same and cross-sex relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 617–626.
21.
PeplauL. ACampbellS. M. (1989). The balance of power in dating and marriage. In FreemanJ. (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (4th ed, pp. 121–137). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
22.
PeplauL. AHillC. TRubinZ. (1993). Sex-role attitudes in dating and marriage: A 15-year follow-up of the Boston Couples Study. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 31–52.
23.
ReisH. TSenchakMSolomonB. (1985). Sex differences in the intimacy of social interaction: Further examination of potential explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1204–1217.
24.
RoseS. M. (1985). Same and cross-sex friendships and the psychology of homosociality. Sex Roles, 12, 63–74.
25.
RubinZ. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265–273.
26.
RubinZ. (1973). Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology. San Francisco: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27.
RubinZ. (1980). Children's friendships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
SapadinL. A. (1988). Friendship and gender: Perspectives of professional men and women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 387–403.
29.
SherrodD. (1989). The influence of gender on same-sex friendships. In HendrickC. (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 164–186). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
SolanoC. H. (1986). People without friends. In DerlegaV.J.WinsteadB.A. (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 227–246). New York: Springer.
31.
SpanierG. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 11, 15–28.
32.
WeissLLowenthalM. F. (1975). Life course perspectives on friendship. In LowenthalM.F.ThurnherM.ChiribogaD.Associates (Eds.), Four stages of life (pp. 48–61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
WeissR. S. (1974). The provisions of social relationships. In RubinZ. (Ed.), Doing unto others (pp. 17–26). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
WheelerLReisHNezlekJ. (1983). Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 943–953.
35.
WinsteadB. A. (1986). Sex differences in same-sex friendships. In DerlegaV.J.WinsteadB.A. (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 81–99). New York: Springer-Verlag.
36.
WrightP. H. (1985). The Acquaintance Description Form. In DuckS.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships (pp. 39–62). London: Sage.
37.
WrightP. H. (1991). The Acquaintance Description Form: What it is and how to use it. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks.
38.
WrightP. HScanlonM. B. (1991). Gender role orientations and friendship: Some attenuation, but gender differences abound. Sex Roles, 24, 551–566.
