Gender receives relatively little attention as a critical aspect of context, despite the general acknowledgment among psychologists that human behavior needs to be studied within the context of societal norms and practices. In this article I explain why this is the case and then, using examples from the area of dual-earner families, describe ways we can give gender its rightful contextual place in research practices. By so doing I also argue that needed transformations can take place.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldousJ. (1990). Specification and speculation concerning the politics of workplace family policies.Journal of Family Issues,11, 355–367
2.
AriesE. (1987). Gender and communication. In ShaverP.HendrickC. (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 149–176). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
3.
BiernatM. (1993). Gender and height: Developmental patterns in knowledge and use of an accurate stereotype.Sex Roles,29, 691–713
4.
BlumsteinP.SchwartzP. (1983). American couples.New York: William Morrow
5.
BolgerN.DelongisA.KesslerR. C.WethingtonE. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles.Journal of Marriage and the Family,51, 175–183
6.
BolgerN.EckenrodeJ. (1991). Social relationships, personality, and anxiety during a major stressful event.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61, 440–49
7.
CancianF. M. (1987). Love in America: Gender and self-development.New York: Cambridge University Press
8.
ClarkM. S.ReisH. T. (1988). Interpersonal process in close relationships.Annual Review of Psychology,39, 609–672
9.
CrosbyF. J. (Ed.)., (1987). Spouse, parent, worker: On gender and multiple roles.New Haven: Yale University Press
10.
CrosbyF. J. (1991). Juggling: The unexpected advantages of balancing career and home for women and their families.New York: The Free Press
11.
DavisB. M.GilbertL. A. (1989). Effect of dispositional and situational influences on women's dominance expression in mixed-sex dyads.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57, 294–300
12.
DeauxK. (1985). Sex and gender. In PorterL.RosenzweigM. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology 1985 (Vol. 36, pp. 49–81). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews
13.
DeauxK.MajorB. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior.Psychological Review,94, 369–389
14.
DerlegaV. J.MettsS.PetronioS.MargulisS. T. (1993). Self-disclosure.Newbury Park, CA: Sage
15.
DrummondJ. (1983). Upstairs to downstairs: Advice to servant girls and weary mothers.Farmers Hall, Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press
16.
EricksonR. J. (1993). Reconceptualizing family work: The effect of emotion work on perceptions of marital quality.Journal of Marriage and the Family,55, 888–900
17.
FowlkesM. R. (1987). The myth of merit and male professional careers: The roles of wives. In GerstelN.GrossH. E. (Eds.), Families and work (pp. 347–360). Philadelphia: Temple University Press
18.
GalinskyE.SteinP. J. (1990). The impact of human resource policies on employees: Balancing work/family life.Journal of Family Issues,11, 368–383
19.
GeneroN. P.MillerJ. B.SurreyJ.BaldwinL. M. (1992). Measuring perceived mutuality in close relationships: Validation of the Mutual Psychological Development Questionnaire.Journal of Family Psychology,6, 36–48
20.
GersonK. (1993). No man's land: Men's changing commitments to family and work.New York: Harper Collins
21.
GilbertL. A. (1985). Men in dual-career families: Current realities and future prospects.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
22.
GilbertL. A. (1993a). Two careers/One family: The promise of gender equality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
23.
GilbertL. A. (1993b). Studying personal relationships in two-career families from a gender-perspective. In PerlmanD.JonesW. H. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 4, pp. 139–164). London: Jessica Kingsley
24.
GilbertL. A.RachlinV. (1987). Mental health and psychological functioning of dual-career families.The Counseling Psychologist,15, 7–49
25.
GilmanC. P. (1914). The man-made world of our androcentric culture.New York: Charlton Co
26.
GuisingerS.BlattS. J. (1994). Individuality and relatedness: Evolution of a fundamental dialectic.American Psychologist,49, 104–111
27.
Hare-MustinR. T.MarecekJ. (1990). Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender.New Haven: Yale University Press
28.
HertzR. (1986). More equal than others: Men and women in dual-career marriages.Berkeley: University of California Press
29.
HoffmanL. W. (1989). Effects of maternal employment in the two-parent family.American Psychologist,44, 283–292
30.
HubbardR. (1990). The politics of women's biology.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press
31.
HydeJ. S.Chair (1993, August). Women, families, and maternity leave: Symposium presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada
32.
HydeJ. S.McKinleyN. M. (1993). Beliefs about the consequences of maternal employment for children: Psychometric analyses.Psychology of Women Quarterly,17, 177–191
33.
KahnA. S.YoderJ. D. (1989). The psychology of women and conservatism: Rediscovering social change.Psychology of Women Quarterly,13, 417–432
34.
KellerE. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science.New Haven: Yale University Press
35.
KellerE. F. (1992). Secrets of life, secrets of death: Essays on language, gender, and science.New York: Routledge
36.
LernerH. E. (1983). Female dependency in context: Some theoretical and technical considerations.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,53, 697–705
37.
MajorB. (1993). Gender, entitlement, and the distribution of family labor.Journal of Social Issues,49, 141–159
38.
MarecekJ.Hare-MustinR. T. (1990, August). Toward a feminist poststructural psychology: The modern self and the postmodern self. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA
39.
MorawskiJ. G. (1990). Toward the unimagined: Feminism and epistemology in psychology. In Hare-MustinR.MarecekJ. (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 150–183). New Haven: Yale University Press
40.
NortonE. H. (1989, September/October). “The hour of the American woman.”Women's Political Times, pp. 11–12
41.
OkinS. M. (1989). Gender, justice and the family.New York: Basic Books
42.
ParleeM. B. (1992). In ZalkS.Gordon-KellerJ. (Eds.), Revolutions in knowledge: Feminism in the social sciences (pp. 33–53). Boulder, CO: Westview Press
43.
PeplauL. A. (1979). Power in dating relationships. In FreemanJ. (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (2nd ed., pp. 106–121). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield
44.
PleckJ. H. (1981a). The myth of masculinity.Boston, MA: MIT Press
45.
PleckJ. H. (1981b). Men's power with women, other men, and society: A men's movement analysis. In LewisR. A. (Ed.), Men in difficult times: Masculinity today and tomorrow (pp. 234–244). New York: Prentice-Hall
46.
PleckJ. H. (1985). Working wives/Working husbands.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
47.
PleckJ. H. (1993). Are “family-supportive” employer policies relevant to men? In HoodJ. C. (Ed.), Work, family, and masculinities.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
48.
RigerS. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and study of women.American Psychologist,47, 730–740
49.
ScarrS.EisenbergM. (1993). Child care research: Issues, perspectives, and results.Annual Review of Psychology,44, 613–644
50.
ScarrS.PhillipsD.McCartneyK. (1990). Facts, fantasies, and the future of child care in the United States.Psychological Science,1, 26–35
51.
SherifC. (1982). Needed concepts in the study of gender identity.Psychology of Women Quarterly,6, 375–398
52.
SpitzeG. (1988). Women's employment and family relations: A review.Journal of Marriage and the Family,50, 595–618
53.
TannenD. (1990). You just don't understand.New York: William Morrow
54.
ThompsonL.WalkerA. J. (1989). Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood.Journal of Marriage and the Family,51, 845–872
55.
UngerR. K. (1979). Toward a redefinition of sex and gender.American Psychologist,34, 1085–1094
56.
UngerR. K. (1990). Imperfect reflections of reality. In Hare-MustinR. T.MarecekJ. (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (102–149). New Haven: Yale University Press
57.
UngerR. K. (1993). The personal is paradoxical: Feminists construct psychology.Feminism & Psychology,3, 211–218
58.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1992). Labor force statistics derived from the current population survey: A databook. Washington, DC
59.
WalkerL. S.WallstonB. S. (1985). Social adaptation: A review of dual-earner family literature. In L'Abate (Ed.), Handbook of family psychology (pp. 698–740). Home-wood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin
60.
WallstonB. S. (1987). Social psychology of women and gender.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,17, 1025–1050
61.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender.Gender & Society,1, 125–151
62.
WestkottM. (1986). The feminist legacy of Karen Horney.New Haven: Yale University Press
