This article attempts to clarify two alternative understandings of gender—the essentialist and the constructionist—and to discuss the implications of each for feminist psychology. Essentialist construals of gender, represented by recent “cultural feminist” positions, are critiqued for the theoretical, empirical, and political concerns they raise. A constructionist position is offered as ameliorative, and lingering questions raised by this analysis are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbeeG. (1986). Toward a just society: Lessons from observations on the primary prevention of psychopathology.American Psychologist,41, 891–898
2.
AuerbachJ.BlumL.SmithV.WilliamsC. (1985). On Gilligan'sIn a different voice. Feminist Studies,11, 149–161
3.
BeckwithB. (1984). How magazines cover sex difference research: Journalism abdicates its watchdog role.Science for the People,16, 18–23
4.
BelenkyM. F.ClinchyB. M.GoldbergerN. R.TarruleJ. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind.New York: Basic Books
5.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality.New York: Doubleday
6.
BohanJ. S. (1990). Contextual history: A framework for re-placing women in the history of psychology.Psychology of Women Quarterly,14, 213–228
7.
BordoS. (1990). Feminism, postmodernism, and gender skepticism. In NicholsL. (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 133–156). New York: Routledge
8.
BroughtonJ. M. (1983). Women's rationality and men's virtues: A critique of gender dualism in Gilligan's theory of moral development.Social Research,50, 597–642
9.
BrownL. (1990). What's addiction got to do with it: A feminist critique of codependence.Psychology of Women: Newsletter of Division 35, American Psychological Association,17(1), 3–4
10.
BurmanE. (1990). Differing with deconstruction: A feminist critique. In ParkerI.ShotterJ. (Eds.), Deconstructing social psychology (pp. 208–220). London: Routledge
CaplanN.NelsonS. D. (1973). On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems.American Psychologist,28, 199–211
13.
ChodorowN. (1978). The reproduction of mothering.Berkeley: University of California Press
14.
CrawfordM. (1989). Agreeing to differ: Feminist epistemologies and women's ways of knowing. In CrawfordM.GentryM. (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives (pp. 128–145). New York: Springer-Verlag
15.
CrawfordM.MarecekJ. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female, 1968–1988.Psychology of Women Quarterly,13, 147–165
16.
DeauxK. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender.American Psychologist,39, 105–116
17.
Di StefanoC. (1990). Dilemmas of difference. In NicholsonL. J. (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 63–82). New York: Routledge
18.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
19.
EngelsF. (1977). The origin of the oppression of women. In AgonitoR. (Ed.), History of ideas on woman: A source book (pp. 273–288). New York: Putnam
20.
FaludiS. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women.New York: Crown
21.
FanonF. (1967). Black skin, white mask (MarkmannC. L., Trans.). New York: Grove
22.
FineM. (1985). Reflections on a feminist psychology of women.Psychology of Women Quarterly,9, 167–183
23.
FineM.GordonS. (1989). Feminist transformations of/despite psychology. In CrawfordM.GentryM., (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives (pp. 146–174). New York: Springer-Verlag
24.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (RamosM. B., Trans.). New York: Seabury
25.
FriedmanW. J.RobinsonA. B.FriedmanB. L. (1987). Sex differences in moral judgements? A test of Gilligan's theory.Psychology of Women Quarterly,11, 37–46
26.
FussD. (1989). Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature and difference.New York: Routledge
27.
GergenK. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology.American Psychologist,40, 266–275
28.
GergenK. J. (1988). Feminist critique of science and the challenge of social epistemology. In GergenM. M. (Ed.), Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge (pp. 27–48). New York: New York University Press
29.
GervasioA. H.CrawfordM. (1989). Social evaluations of assertiveness: A critique and speech act reformulation.Psychology of Women Quarterly,13, 1–25
30.
GilliganC. (1979). Woman's place in man's life cycle.Harvard Educational Review,49, 431–446
31.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
32.
GreenoC. G.MaccobyE. E. (1986). How different is the “different voice”?Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,11, 310–316
33.
HardingS. (1986). The science question in feminism.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
34.
HardingS. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
35.
Hare-MustinR. T. (1991). Sex, lies, and headaches: The problem is power.Journal of Feminist Family Therapy,3, 39–61
36.
Hare-MustinR. T.MarecekJ. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology.American Psychologist,43, 455–464
37.
Hare-MustinR. T.MarecekJ. (1990). Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
38.
HartsockN. C. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In HardingS.HintikkaM. B. (Eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (pp. 283–310). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel
39.
HenleyN. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
40.
hooksb. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center.Boston: South End Press
41.
KahnA. S.JeanP. J. (1983). Integration and elimination or separation and redefinition: The future of the psychology of women as a discipline.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,8, 659–671
42.
KahnA. S.YoderJ. D. (1989). The psychology of women and conservatism: Rediscovering social change.Psychology of Women Quarterly,13, 417–432
43.
KerberL. K.GreenoC. G.MaccobyE. E.LuriaZ.StackC. B.GilliganC. (1986). On In a different voice: An interdisciplinary forum.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,11, 304–333
44.
LermanH. (1986). From Freud to feminist personality theory: Getting here from there.Psychology of Women Quarterly,10, 1–18
45.
LorberJ.FarrellS. A. (1991). The social construction of gender.Newbury Park, CA: Sage
46.
LottB. (1985). The devaluation of women's competence.Journal of Social Issues,41, 43–60
47.
LottB. (1986). Women's lives: Themes and variations in gender learning.Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
48.
LottB. (1988). Separate spheres revisited.Contemporary Social Psychology,13, 55–62
49.
LottB. (1990). Dual natures or learned behavior: The challenge to feminist psychology. In Hare-MustinR. T.MarecekJ. (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 65–101). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
50.
LottB. (1991, August). Social learning of gender: A feminist review. Division 35 Presidential Address presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA
51.
MajorB. (1987). Gender, justice, and the psychology of entitlement. In ShaverP.HendrickC. (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 7. Sex and gender (pp. 124–148). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
52.
MednickM. T. (1989). On the politics of psychological constructs: Stop the bandwagon, I want to get off.American Psychologist,44, 1118–1123.
53.
MillerJ. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women.Boston: Beacon Press
54.
MorawskiJ. G. (1985). The measurement of masculinity and femininity: Engendering categorical realities.Journal of Personality,53, 196–223
55.
MorawskiJ. G. (1990). Toward the unimagined: Feminism and epistemology in psychology. In Hare-MustinR. T.MarecekJ. (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 150–183). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
56.
NicholsonL. J. (Ed.)., (1990). Feminism/postmodernism.New York: Routledge
57.
PooveyM. (1988). Feminism and deconstruction.Feminist Studies,14, 51–65
58.
ProbynE. (1990). Travels in the postmodern: Making sense of the local. In NicholsonL. J. (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 176–189). New York: Routledge
59.
RismanB. J. (1987). Intimate relationships from a microstructural perspective: Men who mother.Gender and Society,1, 6–32
60.
RoseH. (1986). Beyond masculinist realities: A feminist epistemology for the sciences. In BleierR. (Ed.), Feminist approaches to science (pp. 57–76). New York: Pergamon
61.
SampsonE. E. (1977). Psychology and the American ideal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,35, 767–782
62.
SampsonE. E. (1989). The challenge of social change for psychology: Globalization and psychology's theory of the person.American Psychologist,44, 914–921
63.
SampsonE. E. (1990). Social psychology and social control. In ParkerI.ShotterJ. (Eds.), Deconstructing social psychology (pp. 117–126). London: Routledge
64.
SarasonS. B. (1981). An asocial psychology and a misdirected clinical psychology.American Psychologist,36, 827–836
65.
SchemanN. (1983). Individualism and the objects of psychology. In HardingS.HintikkaM. B. (Eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (pp. 225–274). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel
66.
SherifC. W. (1979). What every intelligent person should know about psychology and women. In SnyderE. C. (Ed.), The study of women: Enlarging perspectives on social reality (pp. 143–183). New York: Harper & Row
67.
ShieldsS. A. (1975). Functionalism, Darwinism and the psychology of women: A study in social myth.American Psychologist,30, 739–754
68.
SmithD. (1974). Women's perspectives as a radical critique of sociology.Sociological Inquiry,44, 7–13.
69.
SmithD. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology.Boston: Northeastern
70.
SquireC. (1989). Significant differences: Feminism in psychology.London: Routledge
71.
StackC. B. (1986). The culture of gender: Women and men of color.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,11, 321–324
72.
TavrisC. (1992). The mismeasure of woman.New York: Simon & Schuster
73.
UngerR. K. (1979). Toward a redefinition of sex and gender.American Psychologist,34, 1085–1094
74.
UngerR. K. (1983). Through the looking glass: No wonderland yet! (The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality.)Psychology of Women Quarterly,8, 9–32
75.
UngerR. K. (1989a). Representations: Social constructions of gender.Amityville, NY: Baywood
76.
UngerR. K. (1989b). Sex, gender, and epistemology. In CrawfordM.GentryM. (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives (pp. 17–35). New York: Springer-Verlag
77.
UngerR. K.CrawfordM. (1992). Women and gender: A feminist psychology.New York: McGraw-Hill
78.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender.Gender and Society,1, 125–151
79.
WestkottM. (1986). The feminist legacy of Karen Horney.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
80.
WestkottM. (1988). Female relationality and the idealized self. Unpublished manuscript. University of Colorado, Boulder
81.
YeatmanA. (1990). A feminist theory of social differentiation. In NicholsonL. J. (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 281–299). New York: Routledge
82.
ZannaM.PackS. (1975). On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behavior.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,11, 583–591
