Does gender affect reactions to violations of expected conversational behavior? This study examined ratings of interactants involved in interruptive exchanges. Audio recordings of two-person interactions that varied in gender composition but were identical in script features were rated by judges on several scales, including the degree to which participants were seen to be argumentative, rude, and assertive. Results showed that interrupter sex did not affect ratings even though interrupters were evaluated differently than those they interrupted. However, gender composition significantly affected two of three derived factors, disrespect and assertiveness, such that when a woman interrupted a man, the pair was rated significantly more disrespectful and assertive than either of the two same-sex pairs. Conversational interruptions that occur among mixed-sex pairs are often interpreted not merely as individual infractions but as an assault on the established power relations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyleM.LalljeeM.CookM. (1968).The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad. Human Relations, 21, 3–17
2.
AriesE. (1987).Gender and communication. In ShaverP.HendrickC. (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 149–176). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
3.
BellR. A. (1985).Conversational involvement and loneliness. Communication Monographs, 52, 218–235
4.
CattellR. B. (1965).Factor analysis: An introduction to essentials. (I) The purpose and underlying models. (II) The role of factor analysis in research. Biometrics, 21, 190–215, 405–435
5.
CovelliL. H.MurrayS. O. (1981).Accomplishing topic change. Anthropological Linguistics, 22, 382–390
6.
DindiaK. (1987).The effects of sex of subject and sex of partner on interruptions. Human Communication Research, 13, 345–371
7.
DrassK. A. (1986).The effect of gender identity on conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 294–301
8.
DuncanS.Jr.FiskeD. W. (1977).Face to face interaction: Research, methods, and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
9.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (1982).Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 915–928
10.
EspositoA. (1979).Sex differences in children's conversations. Language and Speech, 22, 213–220
11.
GalloisC.MarkelN. N. (1975).Turn taking: Social personality and conversational style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 1134–1140
12.
HenleyN. M. (1977).Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
13.
KennedyC. W.CamdenC. (1983).Interruptions and nonverbal gender differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 91–108
14.
KollockP.BlumsteinP.SchwartzP. (1985).Sex and power in interaction: Conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, 50, 34–46
15.
LaFranceM.CarmenB. (1980).The nonverbal display of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 36–49
16.
LefflerA.GillespieD. L.ConatyJ. C. (1982).The effects of status differentiation on nonverbal behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 153–161
17.
McMillanL. R.CliftonA. K.McGrathD.GaleW. S. (1977).Women's language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality?Sex Roles, 3, 545–559
18.
MurrayS. O. (1985).Toward a model of members' methods for recognizing interruptions. Language in Society, 13, 31–41
19.
NataleM.EntinE.JaffeeJ. (1979).Vocal interruptions in dyadic communication as a function of speech and social anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 865–878
20.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
21.
OrcuttJ. D.HarveyL. K. (1985).Deviance, rule breaking and male dominance in conversation. Symbolic Interaction, 8, 15–32
22.
RidgewayC.BergerJ. (1986).Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review, 51, 603–617
23.
RobinsonL. F.ReisH. T. (1989).The effect of interruption, gender, and status on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 141–153
24.
RogerD. B.SchumacherA. (1983).Effects of individual differences on dyadic conversational strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 700–705
25.
SacksH.SchegloffE. A.JeffersonG. (1974).A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735
26.
Smith-LovinL.BrodyC. (1989).Interruptions in group discussions: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review, 54, 424–435
27.
TannenD. (1983).When is an overlap not an interruption? One component of conversational style. In DiPietroR. J.BrawleyW.WedelA. (Eds.), The first Delaware Symposium on Language Studies (pp. 119–129). Newark: University of Delaware Press
28.
WestC. (1979).Against our will: Male interruptions of females in cross-sex conversation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 327, 81–97
29.
WestC. (1982).Why can't a woman be more like a man? An interactional note on organizational game playing for managerial women. Work and Occupations, 9, 5–29
30.
WestC. (1984).When the doctor is a ‘lady’: Power, status, and gender in physician-patient encounters. Symbolic Interaction, 7, 87–105
31.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1977).Women's place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent–child interaction. Social Problems, 24, 521–529
32.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1983).Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In ThorneB.KramaraeC.HenleyN. (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 102–117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House
33.
WillisF. N.WilliamsS. J. (1976).Simultaneous talking in conversation and sex of speakers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 1067–1070
34.
ZimmermanD. H.WestC. (1975).Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In ThorneB.HenleyN. (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105–129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House
