Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purposes of this study were (a) to explore the utility of a model for predicting reporting of sexual harassment and (b) to collect data on the incidence of sexual harassment using the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ; Fitzgerald et al., 1988). The sample included 214 tenure-track faculty women and 276 women graduate students. The full model postulated that age, marital status, feminist ideology, and frequency of behavior would be directly related to perceived offensiveness of the behavior. In turn, perceived offensiveness, normative expectations for reporting, and perceived outcomes of reporting would directly influence reporting. As predicted, perceived offensiveness showed a direct influence on reporting, and feminist ideology and frequency of behavior were significant predictors of perceived offensiveness. Incidence data showed that the most frequently experienced situations involved gender harassment and seductive behaviors. Results suggest that educating women about the offensiveness of sexual harassment might increase frequency of reporting. Also, further exploration of the model seems warranted.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. W.

Kottke

J. L.

Padgitt

J. S.

(1983). Sexual harassment of university students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 24, 484–490

Ajzen

Fishbein

(1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Amir

(1971). Patterns in forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Asher

H. B.

(1976). Causal modeling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

Benson

D. J.

Thomson

G. E.

(1982). Sexual harassment on a university campus: The confluence of authority relations, sexual interest and gender stratification. Social Problems, 29, 236–251

Burgess

A. W.

Holmstrom

L. L.

(1974). Rape trauma syndrome. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 981–986

Crull

(1982). Stress effects of sexual harassment on the job: Implications for counseling. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 539–544

Feldman-Summers

Ashworth

(1981). Factors related to intentions to report a rape. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 53–70

Feldman-Summers

Norris

(1984). Differences between rape victims who report and those who do not report to a public agency. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 562–573

10.

Fishbein

Ajzen

(1975). Beliefs, attitudes, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

11.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(in press). Sexual harassment: The definition and measurement of a construct. In Paludi

(Ed.), Ivory power: Sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Albany: SUNY Press

12.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

Shullman

S. L.

Bailey

Richards

Swecker

Gold

Ormerod

Weitzman

(1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment. in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152–175

13.

Gilbert

L. A.

Scher

(1989). The power of an unconscious belief: Male entitlement and sexual intimacy with clients. Professional Practice of Psychology, 8, 94–108

14.

Gutek

B. A.

Nakamura

C. Y.

Gohart

Handschumacher

Russell

(1980). Sexuality and the workplace. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 255–265

15.

Jensen

I. W.

Gutek

B. A.

(1982). Attributions of responsibility in sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 121–136

16.

Koss

M. P.

(1985). The hidden victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 193–212

17.

McDermott

J. J.

(1979). Rape victimization in 26 American cities. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service, U. S. Government Printing Office

18.

Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office

19.

Metha

Nigg

(1983). Sexual harassment on campus: An institutional response. Journal of the National Association of Women Deans and Counselors, 46, 9–15

20.

Ormerod

(1987a). Perceptions of sexual harassment. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, New York

21.

Ormerod

(1987b). Sexual harassment of women doctoral students in counseling psychology. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, New York

22.

Pedhazur

E. J.

(1983). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston

23.

Pryor

J. B.

(1985). The lay person's understanding of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 13, 273–286

24.

Pryor

J. B.

Day

J. D.

(1984). Unpublished study. University of Notre Dame. (Cited in Pryor, 1985)

25.

Russell

(1980). Rape victims and police reporting. Canada's Mental Health, 28 (2), 14–16

26.

Schneider

B. E.

(1982). Consciousness about sexual harassment among heterosexual and lesbian women workers. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 75–98

27.

Singleton

R. J.

Christiansen

J. B.

(1977). The construct validation of a short form of attitudes toward feminism scale. Sociology and Social Research, 61, 294–303

28.

Smith

E. R.

Ferree

M. M.

Miller

F. D.

(1975). A short scale of attitudes towards feminism. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 6, 51–56

29.

Sullivan

Bybee

D. I.

(1987). Female students and sexual harassment: What factors predict reporting behavior? Journal of the National Association of Women Deans and Counselors, 50 (2), 11–16

30.

Terpstra

D. F.

Baker

D. D.

(1986). A framework for the study of sexual harassment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 17–34

31.

Till

F. J.

(1980). Sexual harassment: A report on the sexual harassment of students. Washington, DC: National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs

32.

Williams

L. S.

(1984). The classic rape: When do victims report? Social Problems, 31, 459–467

Reporting Sexual Harassment: Exploring a Predictive Model

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References