Men with high belief in a just world evaluated a videotaped rape victim more negatively than did men with low belief in a just world. Women with high belief in a just world were less negative toward the rape victim than women with low belief in a just world. Participants with low belief in a just world recommended significantly longer prison sentences for the rapist. Evaluations of the rapist and rape victim were not influenced by information about the outcome of the case (the rapist was never caught, the rapist was caught and sentenced to either 1 or 15 years in prison). Implications for just-world beliefs of jurors in rape trials were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcockA. C.IrelandN. K. (1983). Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex-role attitude. Sex Roles, 9, 179–193.
2.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
3.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.
4.
BurtM. R.AlbinR. S. (1981). Rape myths, rape definitions, and probability of conviction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 212–230.
5.
CalhounL. G.SelbyJ. W.CannA.KellerG. T. (1978). The effects of victim physical attractiveness and sex of respondent on social reactions to victims of rape. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 191–192.
6.
CalhounL. G.SelbyJ. W.WarringL. J. (1976). Social perception of the victim's causal role in rape: An exploratory examination of four factors. Human Relations, 29, 517–526.
7.
ClarkL.LewisD. (1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto: The Women's Press.
8.
DeitzS. R.BlackwellK. T.DaleyP. C.BentleyB. J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372–384.
9.
DeitzS. R.LittmanM.BentleyB. J. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness. Sex Roles, 10, 261–280.
10.
Feldman-SummersS.LindnerK. (1976). Perceptions of victims and defendants in criminal assault cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 3, 135–150.
11.
FeildH. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156–179.
12.
KanekarS.KolsawallaM. B. (1980). Responsibility of a rape victim in relation to her respectability, attractiveness, and provocativeness. Journal of Social Psychology, 112, 153–154.
13.
KanekarS.PintoN. J.MazumdarD. (1985). Causal and moral responsibility of victims of rape and robbery. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 622–637.
14.
KanekarS.VazL. (1983). Determinants of perceived likelihood of rape and victim's fault. Journal of Social Psychology, 120, 147–148.
15.
KrulewitzJ. E. (1981). Sex differences in evaluations of female and male victims' responses to assault. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 460–474.
16.
KrulewitzJ. E.NashJ. E. (1979). Effects of rape victim resistance, assault outcome, and sex of observer on attributions about rape. Journal of Personality, 47, 557–574.
17.
KrulewitzJ. E.PayneE. J. (1978). Attribution about rape: Effects of rapist force, observer sex and sex role attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 291–305.
18.
LangerE. J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In HarveyJ. H.IckesW.KiddR. F. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
LernerM. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.
20.
LernerM. J.MillerD. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.
21.
MillerF. D.SmithE. R.FerreeM. M.TaylorS. E. (1976). Predicting perceptions of victimization. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 352–359.
22.
ParishT. S.BryantW.ShiraziA. (1976a). Further report on the validation of the Personal Attribute Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 1257–1258.
23.
ParishT. S.BryantW.ShiraziA. (1976b). The Personal Attribute Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 715–720.
24.
ParishT. S.EadsG. (1977). The Personal Attribute Inventory as a self-concept measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 1063–1067.
25.
ParishT. S.EadsG.AdamsD. (1977). The Personal Attribute Inventory as a self-concept scale: A preliminary report. Psychological Reports, 41, 1141–1142.
26.
RubinZ.PeplauA. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the national draft lottery. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 73–93.
27.
RubinZ.PeplauA. (1975). Who believes in a just world?Journal of Social Issues, 29, 73–93.
28.
SchwendingerJ. R.SchwendingerH. (1983). Rape and inequality. London: Sage.
29.
ShaverK. G.DrownD. (1986). On causality, responsibility, and self-blame: A theoretical note. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 697–702.
30.
SmithE. R.FerreeM. M.MillerF. D. (1975). A short scale of attitudes toward feminism. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 6, 51–56.
31.
SmithR. E.KeatingJ. P.HesterR. K.MitchellH. E. (1976). Role and justice considerations in the attribution of responsibility to a rape victim. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 346–357.
32.
TetreaultP. A.BarnettM. A. (1987). Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 353–358.
33.
WardC. (1988). The Attitudes Toward Rape Victims Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 127–146.
34.
WienerR. L.ErkerP. V. (1986). The effects of prebriefing misinformed research participants on their attributions of responsibility. Journal of Psychology, 120, 397–410.
35.
WienerR. L.RinehartN. (1986). Psychological causality in the attribution of responsibility for rape. Sex Roles, 14, 369–382.
36.
YarmeyA. D. (1985). Older and younger adults' attributions of responsibility toward rape victims and rapists. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 17, 327–338.
