Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1985-12
A Search for Gender Differences on Fertility-Related Attitudes: Questioning the Relevance of Sociobiology Theory for Understanding Social Psychological Aspects of Human Reproduction
Data from 12 NORC surveys done between 1965 and 1984 were analyzed to test the hypothesis, derived from sociobiology theory, that men and women would have different attitudinal orientations toward fertility. The hypothesis that men would be more oriented toward quantity of offspring than women, as reflected in their attitudes toward abortion and ideal family size, was not supported. The effect of gender was negligible both in the absolute sense and in comparison to that of education and religiosity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlakeJ. (1967). Reproductive ideals and educational attainment among White Americans, 1943–1960.Population Studies, 21, 159–174
2.
BlakeJ. (1971). Abortion and public opinion.Science, 171540–549
3.
BogenI. (1974). Attitudes of women who have had abortions.Journal of Sex Research, 10, 97–109
CoombsC.CoombsL.McClellandG. (1975). Preference scales for number and sex of children.Population Studies, 29, 273–298
6.
CunninghamM. (1981). Sociobiology as a supplementary paradigm for social psychological research. In WheelerL. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 69–106). Beverly Hills: Sage
7.
DavisJ. (1984). General social surveys, 1972–1984: Cumulative codebook.Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago
8.
EllisL. (1977). The decline and fall of sociology, 1975–2000.The American Sociologist, 12, 56–66
9.
GranbergD. (1978). Pro-life or reflection of conservative ideology? An analysis of opposition to legalized abortion.Sociology and Social Research, 62, 414–429
KieslerS. (1977). Post hoc justification of family size.Sociometry, 40, 59–67
12.
QuadagnoJ. (1979). Paradigms in evolutionary theory: The sociobiological model of natural selection.American Sociological Review, 44, 100–109
13.
RossiA. (1966). Abortion laws and their victims.Trans-action, 3, 7–12
14.
SmetanaJ. (1979). Beliefs about the permissibility of abortion and their relationship to decisions regarding abortion.Journal of Population, 2, 294–305
TriversR. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In CampbellB. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine
17.
Van den BergheP. (1978). Man in society: A biosocial view.New York: Elsevier
18.
Van den BergheP.BarashD. (1977). Inclusive fitness and human family structure.American Anthropologist, 79, 809–823
19.
WilsonE. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis.Cambridge, MA: Belknap
