Males and females in kindergarten and third grade predicted whether a boy or a girl would succeed on a masculine or a feminine task. Some predictions were confirmed; others were not. The children were asked to explain the winner's success by choosing among four determinants of achievement: ability, effort, task ease, and luck. For third graders, luck was more important in determining the success of an unpredicted winner than a predicted winner. For both ages, female success on a masculine task was attributed more to effort than to ability. These findings support attribution theory and indicate that differential perceptions of male and female performance exist in young children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CampbellJ. D.Peer relations in childhood. In HoffmanM. L.HoffmanL. W. (Eds), Review of child development research (vol. 1). New York: Russell Sage, 1964.
2.
DeauxK.EmswillerT.Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What's skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 80–85.
3.
EtaughC.BrownB.Perceiving the causes of success and failure of male and female performers.Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 103.
4.
FalboT.The attributional explanation of academic performance by kindergarteners and their teachers.Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1973, 8(1), 123–124. (Summary).
5.
FalboT.Achievement attributions of kindergarteners. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 529–530.
6.
FeatherN. T.SimonJ. G.Causal attributions for success and failure in relation to expectations of success based upon selective or manipulative control, Journal of Personality, 1971, 39, 527–541.
7.
Feldman-SummersS. A.KieslerS. B.Those who are number two try harder: The effect of sex on attributions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 846–855.
8.
FidellL. S.Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 1094–1098.
9.
FriezeI.WeinerB.Cue utilization and attributional judgments for success and failure. Journal of Personality, 1971, 39, 590–605.
10.
GoldbergP. A.Are women prejudiced against women?Transaction, 1968, 5, 28–30.
11.
KirkR. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1968.
12.
LewinA. Y.DuchanL.Women in academia. Science, 1971, 173, 892–895.
13.
MaccobyE. E.JacklinC. N.The psychology of sex differences. Stanford Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1974.
14.
PhetersonC. I.KieslerS. B.GoldbergP. A.Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, achievement, and personal history, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 19, 114–118.
15.
SteinA. H.SmithellsJ.Age and sex differences in children's sex-role standards about achievement. Developmental Psychology, 1969, 1, 252–259.
16.
WeinerB.FriezeI.KuklaA.ReedL.RestS.RosenbaumR. M.Perceiving the causes of success and failure. New York: General Learning Press, 1971.
17.
ZalkS. R.KatzP. A.WeissJ.Sex biases in children. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., September, 1976.
