The case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka holds an esteemed position in the secondary school curriculum. Given prominent attention in virtually all social studies textbooks and included in more state standards documents than any other Supreme Court ruling, the Brown decision is often presented to secondary school students as a democratic achievement of such magnitude that it deserves iconic status. In contrast, scholars and civil rights activists are currently deliberating whether Brown and its legacies should be viewed as an icon, liberation referent, unfulfilled promise, well-intentioned error, or irrelevant. This article explores the incongruity between “academic” and “school” knowledge about Brown and argues for a revisioning of this landmark case and its effects in the secondary school curriculum.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Bar Association. (In press). A review of the treatment of law-related content in secondary U.S. history, civics, and government textbooks. Chicago: American Bar Association Division for Public Education.
AppleM. W., and Christian-SmithL. K. (Eds.). (1991). The politics of the textbook. New York: Routledge.
4.
BalkinJ. M., and AckermanB. A. (2001). What Brown v. Board of Education should have said: The nation's top legal experts rewrite America's landmark civil rights decision. New York: New York University Press.
5.
BanksJ. A. (1996). Multicultural education, transformative knowledge, and action: Historical and contemporary perspectives. New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
BellD. A. (1995). Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest Convergence Dilemma. In and and CrenshawK. (Ed.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 20—29). New York: New Press.
7.
BellD. A. (2001). Revised decisions: Dissenting. In BalkinJ.M., and AckermanB.A. (Eds.), What Brown v. Board of Education should have said: The nation's top legal experts rewrite America's landmark civil rights decision (pp. 185—200). New York: New York University Press.
8.
Brandsberg-EngelmannJ. (2002). Teaching Brown v. Board of Education. Social Education, 66, 66—67.
9.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 484 (1954).
10.
CornblethC. (2002). Images of America: What youth do know about the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 519—552.
11.
EpsteinT. (1997). Sociocultural approaches to young people's historical understanding. Social Education, 61, 28—32.
12.
GoodladJ. I. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
HessD., and MarriA. (2002). Which cases should we teach?Social Education, 66, 53—59.
16.
HillO. (2000). Transcript of a symposium on Brown v. Board of Education: An exercise in advocacy. Mercer Law Review, 52, 581—630.
17.
IsaacK. (1992). Civics for democracy: A journey for teachers and students. Washington, DC: Essential Books.
18.
KlarmanM. J. (1994). How Brown changed race relations: The backlash thesis. Journal of American History, 81, 81—118.
19.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1996). Multicultural issues in the classroom: Race, class, and gender. In EvansR.W., and SaxeD.W. (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues (pp. 100—110). Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
20.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2004). Landing on the wrong note: The price we paid for Brown. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 3—13.
21.
Ladson-BillingsG., and TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47—68.
22.
LagemannE. C. (1996). An American dilemma still. In LagemannE.C., and MillerE.C. (Eds.), Brown v. Board of Education: The challenge for today's schools (pp. 1—8). New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
LeeC. (2004). Is resegregation real?Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
24.
LevineP., and LopezM. H. (2004). Themes emphasized in social studies and civics classes: New evidence [CIRCLE Fact Sheet]. College Park: The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement, University of Maryland.
25.
LoewenJ. W. (1995). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York: New Press.
26.
McClenagahnW. A. (Ed.). (2003). Magruder's American Government. Needham, MA: Prentice Hall.
27.
MillerS., EckelJ., HaynesR., and ParkerC. J. (Eds.). (2000). World history: People and nations. Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
28.
OrfieldG., and LeeC. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
29.
OrfieldG., and YunJ. T. (1999). Resegregation in American schools. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
30.
ParkerW. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
PattersonJ. T. (2001). Brown v. Board of Education: A civil rights milestone and its troubled legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
RaskinJ. B. (2003). Overruling democracy: The Supreme Court vs. the American people. New York: Routledge.
33.
RosenbergG. N. (1999). African-American rights after Brown. Journal of Supreme Court History, 24, 201—225.
34.
SchweberS. A. (2004). Making sense of the Holocaust: Lessons from classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
ShagerE. (2002). Review of J. T. Patterson, Brown v. Board of Education: A civil rights milestone and its troubled legacy. Social Education, 66, 70—71.
36.
SimonK. G. (2001). Moral questions in the classroom: How to get kids to think deeply about real life and their schoolwork. New Haven, CTYale University Press.
37.
SpielvogelJ. J. (Ed.). (1998). World history: The human odyssey (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth.
38.
WareL. (2004, May/June). The unfulfilled promise. The Crisis Magazine, 111, 43.
39.
WilkinsR. (1996). Dream deferred but not defeated. In LagemannE.C., and MillerL.P. (Eds.), Brown v. Board of Education: The challenge for today's schools (pp. 14—18). New York: Teachers College Press.
40.
ZimmermanJ. (2002). Whose America? Culture wars in the public schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
