This article focuses on the ways in which a small group consisting mostly of Black queer youth makes sense of their use of language to assert agency in a world that is often heterosexist, homophobic, ageist, and racist. The author draws from the work of Gee and Anzaldúa to identify what youth call “Gaybonics,” as a Borderland Discourse that is intertwined with Ebonics. The author and youth worked together in a youth-run center for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning youth to analyze the ways that these youth engaged in Gaybonics to elicit pleasure and subvert oppression, and, when their borders were violated, they shifted from this discourse to another to retaliate against hatred. When youth analyzed their use of Borderland Discourses, they came to understand the ways that they engage in such discourses to position themselves as agents and the power they can (and cannot) access by engaging in various discourses. The author asserts that youth need opportunities to explore such access to power through language, particularly in the margins, as conceptualized by hooks. Finally, the author calls for work with youth that not only supports their assertion of agency but also their efforts at activism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnzaldúaG. (1987). Borderlands/La fronteras: The New mestiza. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
2.
BarrettR. (1999). Indexing polyphonous identity in the speech of African American drag queens. In BucholtzM., LiangA.C., and SuttonL.A. (Eds.), Reinventing identities: The Gendered self in discourse (pp. 313—331). New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BlackburnM. V. (2003). Exploring literacy performances and power dynamics at The Attic: Queer youth reading the world and the word. Research in the Teaching of English, 37(4), 467—490.
4.
BlackburnM. V. (2001). Reading and writing for social change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
5.
BlomJ. P., and GumperzJ. J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structure: Code-switching in Norway. In GumperzJ.J., and HymesD. (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 407—434). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
6.
BrewerJ. M. (1978). Introduction. In and and SpaldingH.D., Encyclopedia of black folklore and humor (pp. ix–x). Middle Village, NY: Jonathan David Publishers.
7.
BritzmanD. P. (1997). What is this thing called love?: New discourses for understanding gay and lesbian youth. In de CastellS., and BrysonM. (Eds.), Radical in<ter>ventions: Identity, politics, and difference/s on educational praxis (pp. 183—207). Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
ButlerJ. (1989). Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
9.
CouplandN. (2001). Language, situation, and the relational self: Theorizing dialect-style in sociolinguistics. In EckertP., and RickfordJ.R. (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 185—210). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
EatonS. (1993). Gay students find little support in most schools. The Harvard Educational Letter, 9, 6—8.
11.
FergusonR. (1990). Introduction: Invisible center. In FergusonR., GeverM., Minh-haT.T., and WestC. (Eds.), Out there: Marginalization and contemporary cultures (pp. 9—14). New York: New Museum of Contemporary Art.
12.
FergusonR., GeverM., Minh-haT. T., and WestC. (1990). Out there: Marginalization and contemporary cultures. New York: New Museum of Contemporary Art.
13.
FordhamS. (1999). Dissin’ “the standard”: Ebonics as guerilla warfare at Capital High. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 30(3), 272—293.
14.
FoucaultM. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction, volume 1. New York: Vintage.
15.
FreireP. (1991). The importance of the act of reading. In PowerB.M., and HubbardR.S. (Eds.), Literacy in process (pp. 21—26). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
16.
GeeJ. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
17.
GrayM. L. (1999). In your face: Stories from the lives of queer youth. New York: Harrington Park Press.
18.
hooksb. (1990a). Marginality as site of resistance. In FergusonR., GeverM., Minh-haT.T., and WestC. (Eds.), Out there: Marginalization and contemporary cultures (pp. 341—343). New York: New Museum of Contemporary Art.
19.
hooksb. (1990b). talking back. In FergusonR., GeverM., Minh-haT.T., and WestC. (Eds.), Out there: Marginalization and contemporary cultures (pp. 337—340). New York: New Museum of Contemporary Art.
20.
hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
21.
Human Rights Watch. (2001). Hatred in the hallways: Violence and discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender students in U. S. schools. New York: Human Rights Watch.
22.
LeeS. J. (1996). Unraveling the “model minority” stereotype: Listening to Asian American youth. New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
LiangA. C. (1999). Conversationally implicating lesbian and gay identity. In BucholtzM., LiangA.C., and SuttonL.A. (Eds.), Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse (pp. 293—310). New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
LordeA. (1984). Sister outsider. Freedom, CA: The Crossing Press.
25.
MurrayK. (1998). An activist forum II: Fault line. In AyersW., HuntJ.A., and QuinnT. (Eds.), Teaching for social justice (pp. 131—132). New York: The New Press.
26.
OwensR. E.Jr. (1998). Queer kids: The challenges and promise for lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. New York: Harrington Park Press.
27.
PercelayJ., IveyM., and DweckS. (1994). Snaps. New York: Quill William Morrow.
28.
PerryT. (1998). “I on know why they be trippin”: Reflections on the Ebonics debate. In PerryT., and DelpitL. (Eds.), The real Ebonics debate: Power, language, and the education of African American children (pp. 3—15). Boston: Beacon Press.
29.
PerryT., and DelpitL. (Eds.). (1998). The real Ebonics debate: Power, language, and the education of African American children. Boston: Beacon Press.
30.
RofesE. (1995). Making our schools safe for sissies. In and and UnksG. (Ed.), The gay teenager: Educational practice and theory for lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents (pp. 79—84). New York: Routledge.
31.
SandovalC. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
Savin-WilliamsR. C. (1994). Verbal and physical abuse as stressors in the lives of lesbian, gay male and bisexual youths: Associations with school problems, running away, substance abuse, prostitution and suicide. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 62(26), 261—269.
33.
SchultzK., and HullG. (2002). Locating literacy theory in out-of-school contexts. In HullG., and SchultzK. (Eds.), School's out!: Literacy and learning outside of school (pp. 11—31). New York: Teachers College Press.
34.
SmithE. (1998). What is Black English? What is Ebonics? In PerryT., and DelpitL. (Eds.), The real Ebonics debate: Power, language, and the education of African American children (pp. 49—58). Boston: Beacon Press.
35.
SmithermanG. (1998). Black English/Ebonics: What it be like? In PerryT., and DelpitL. (Eds.), The real Ebonics debate: Power, language, and the education of African American children (pp. 29—37). Boston: Beacon Press.
36.
TuckerM. (1990). Director's forward. In FergusonR., GeverM., Minh-haT.T., and WestC. (Eds.), Out there: Marginalization and contemporary cultures (pp. 7—8). New York: New Museum of Contemporary Art.
37.
UnksG. (1995). The gay teen educational practice and theory for lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. New York: Routledge Press.
