Researched in the narrative inquiry tradition, this article examines the influence of state-mandated accountability testing on Eagle High School's dramatically shifting context and the embodied knowledge held and expressed by principal, Henry Richards, and the Eagle teachers. Through carefully unpacking Richards's “dragon in school backyards” metaphor, the way the prevailing state accountability system shaped and continues to shape the school's development becomes revealed. The inquiry raises serious questions about the relationships between and among curriculum, instruction, and standardized testing for accountability purposes and what educators are asked and required to do in the pursuit of educational excellence as defined by policy makers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsT. (1998). A dictionary of nature myths.Oxford, UK: University of Oxford Press.
2.
AokiT. (1990). Beyond the half-life of curriculum and pedagogy. One World, 27(2), 3–10.
3.
ArgyrisC., & SchonD. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
AstutoT., & ClarkD. (1994). Roots of reform: Challenging the assumptions that control change in education.Bloomingdale, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
5.
BergerP. L., & LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality.Toronto, Canada: Doubleday.
6.
CampbellJ. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
CampbellJ. (1972). Myths to live by.New York: Penguin Books.
8.
CarrD. (1986). Time, narrative, and history.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
ClandininD. J. (1986). Classroom practice: Teacher images in action.Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
10.
ClandininD. J. (1992). Narrative and story in teacher education. In RussellT., & MunbyH. (Eds.) Teachers and teaching. From classrooms to reflection (pp. 124–137). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
11.
ClandininD. J., & ConnellyF. M. (1995). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes.New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
ClandininD. J., & ConnellyF. M. (1996). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories — Stories of teachers, School stories — Stories of school. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 2–14.
13.
ClandininD. J., & ConnellyF. M. (1998). Stories to live by: Narrative understandings of school reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(2), 149–164.
14.
ClandininD. J., & ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
ConnellyF. M., & ClandininD. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.
16.
CraigC. J. (1995). Dilemmas in crossing the boundaries on the professional knowledge landscape. In ClandininD. Jean, & Michael ConnellyF. (Eds.), Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes.New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
CraigC. J. (1997). Telling stories: A way to access beginning teacher knowledge. Teaching Education Journal, 9, 61–68.
18.
CraigC.J. (1999). Parallel stories: A way of contextualizing teacher stories. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 397–412.
19.
CraigC. J. (2001). The relationships between and among teachers’ narrative knowledge, communities of knowing, and top-down school reform: A case of “The Monkey's Paw.” Curriculum Inquiry, 31(3), 303–331.
20.
CraigC. J. (2002). School portfolio development: A way to access teacher knowledge. In SurgueC., & DayC. (Eds.), Developing teachers and teaching practice: International research perspectives.New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
21.
CraigC. J. (2003). Story constellations: A way to characterize school contexts and teacher knowledge. Teaching and Curriculum Dialogue, 5, 31–41.
22.
CritesS. (1979). The aesthetics of self-deception. Soundings, 62, 107–129.
23.
CzarniawkaB. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
DavisO. L. (2000). Research never says. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 15(3), 175–178.
25.
Eagle High School. (1988-1989). Blue Ribbon Secondary School Recognition Program Report. Unpublished Document.
26.
Eagle High School. (1993-1994). Project SOAR. Unpublished Document.
27.
Eagle High School. (1998-1999). Eagle High School Portfolio. Unpublished Document.
28.
Eagle High School. (1999-2000). Eagle High School Portfolio. Unpublished Document.
29.
Eagle High School. (2001-2002). Eagle High School Portfolio. Unpublished Document.
30.
EisnerE. (1990). Who decides what schools will teach?Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 523–526.
31.
EisnerE. (2001, April). What does it mean to say a school is doing well? Paper presented at the Epiphany Series Lecture, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
32.
ElbazF. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge.London: Croon Helm.
33.
FarrellJ. (2000). Why is educational reform so difficult? Similar descriptions, different prescriptions, failed explanations. Curriculum Inquiry, 30, 83–102.
34.
FinnC. (1993). We must take charge: Our schools, our future.New York: Free Press.
35.
FullanM. (1991). The new meaning of educational change.New York: Teachers College Press.
HatchT. (1998). The differences in theory that matter in the practice of school improvement. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 3–31.
38.
LakoffG., & JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we live by.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
MadausG., & ClarkeM. (2001). The adverse impact of high stakes testing on minority students: Evidence from 100 years of test data. In OrfieldG., & KornhaberM. (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in publication (pp. 85–106). New York: Century Foundation.
40.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
41.
NatrielloG., & PallasA. (2001). The development and impact of high stakes testing. In OrfieldG., & KornhaberM. L. (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers?: Inequality and high-stakes testing (pp. 19–38). New York: Century Foundation.
42.
NissimovR. (2002, August, 28). [State] can't shake poor SAT rating: Math, verbal scores in bottom five. City Newspaper, pp. 25A–26A.
43.
OlsonM., & CraigC. (2001). Opportunities and challenges in the development of teacher knowledge: The development of narrative authority through knowledge communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 667–684.
44.
OlsonM., & CraigC. (2004). Uncovering cover stories: Claiming not to know what we know and why we do it. Unpublished manuscript.
45.
PeshkinA. (1986). In search of subjectivity—One's own. Educational Researcher, 17–21.
46.
PolkinghorneD. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences.Albany: State University of New York Press.
47.
RavitchD. (1996). National standards in American education: A citizen's guide.New York: Brookings Institute.
48.
RodriguezL (2001, July 15). A revolving cycle: Some fear historic neighborhoods lose identity. City Newspaper, p. 18A.
49.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action.New York: Basic Books.
50.
SchönD. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner.London: Jossey-Bass.
51.
SchönD. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner: Case studies in and on educational practice.New York: Teachers College Press.
52.
SchönD. A., & McDonaldJ. P. (1998). Doing what you mean to do in school reform.Providence, RI: Brown University.
53.
SizerT. R. (1992). Horace's school: Redesigning the American high school.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
54.
SpenceD. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalyse.New York: Norton.
55.
WilliamsB. (1996). Closing the achievement of gap: A vision for changing beliefs and practice.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
