How might revolutions and other processes of institutional disintegration inform political processes preceding them? By mapping paths of agency through processes of institutional disintegration, the trajectory improvisation model of institutional breakdown overcomes “action-structure” binaries by framing political revolutions as possible outcomes of such disintegrative processes. The trajectory improvisation approach expands the trajectory adjustment model of social change developed by Gil Eyal, Iván Szelényi, and Eleanor Townsley. An overview of political revolution in Soviet Russia between 1989 and 1991 illustrates trajectory improvisation. The recent American invasion and occupation of Iraq shows alternative routes to institutional disintegration, indicating the independence of models of institutional breakdown from those of social movements. These cases illustrate both the diversity of situations the trajectory improvisation model speaks to, and the limitation of models of trajectory adjustment, improvisation, social movements, and invasions, illustrating why such models at best enable what are called “explanatory narratives” of actual historical processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottA.1992. “From Causes to Events: Notes on Narrative Positivism.”Sociological Methods and Research20(May):428–55.
2.
Al-KhafajiI.2003. “A Few Days After: State and Society in a Post-Saddam Iraq.” Pp. 77–92 in Iraq at the Crossroads: State and Society in the Shadow of Regime Change, edited by DodgeT.SimonS.London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.
3.
BarrowJ. D.1991. Theories of Everything: The Quest for Ultimate Explanation.New York: Fawcett Columbine.
4.
BellahR. N.1973. “Introduction.” Pp. ix–lv in Emile Durkheim: On Morality and Society, edited by BellahR. N.Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BendixR.1984. Force, Fate and Freedom: On Historical Sociology.Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
6.
BlauP. M.1998. “Culture and Social Structure.” Pp. 265–75 in What is Social Theory? The Philosophical Debates, edited by SicaA.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7.
BonnellV. E.1990. “Voluntary Associations in Gorbachev's Reform Program.” Pp. 63–76 in Can Gorbachev's Reforms Succeed?, edited by BreslauerG. W.Berkeley, CA: Berkeley-Stanford Program in Soviet Studies.
8.
BourdieuP.1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Translated by NiceR.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BourdieuP.1986. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 240–58 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by RichardsonJ. G.New York: Greenwood Press.
10.
BourdieuP.1988. Homo Academicus, translated by CollierP.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
BourdieuP.1991. Language and Symbolic Power, translated by RaymondG.AdamsonM.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BourdieuP.1993. “The Field of Cultural Production, or, the Economic World Reversed.” Pp. 29–73 in The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, translated by NiceR.New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. J. D.1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology.Chicago: Chicago University Press.
14.
BuechlerS. M.2004. “The Strange Career of Strain and Breakdown Theories of Collective Action.” Pp. 47–66 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
15.
ChiesaG.1993. Transition to Democracy: Political Change in the Soviet Union, 1987–1991, with NorthmpD. T.Hanover, NH and London: University Press of New England.
16.
CohenJ. L.1985. “Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contemporary Social Movements.”Social Research52(4):663–716.
17.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W.1991. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” Pp. 63–82 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J.Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
18.
DurkheimE.1961. Moral Education: A Study in the Theory and Application of the Sociology of Education, Translated by WilsonE. K.SchnurerH.New York: Free Press.
19.
EyalG.SzelényiI.TownsleyE.1998. Making Capitalism Without Capitalists: The New Ruling Elites in Eastern Europe.London: Verso.
20.
FehérF.HellerA.MárkusG.1983. Dictatorship Over Needs.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
21.
FerneaR. A.LouisW. R.1991. The Iraqi Revolution of 1958: The Old Social Classes Revisited.London and New York: I. B. Tauris & Co.
22.
FuchsS.2001. Against Essentialism: A Theory of Culture and Society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
GamsonW. A.1992. Talking Politics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GarcelonM.1997a. “The Shadow of the Leviathan: Public and Private in Communist and Post-communist Society.” Pp. 303–32 in Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, edited by WeintraubJ.KumarK.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
GarcelonM.1997b. “The Estate of Change: The Specialist Rebellion and the Democratic Movement in Moscow, 1989–1991.”Theory and Society26:39–85.
26.
GarcelonM.2005. Revolutionary Passage: From Soviet to Post-Soviet Russia, 1985–2000.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
27.
GiddensA.1984. The Constitution of Society.Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
28.
GiesenB.1987. “Beyond Reductionism: Four Models Relating Micro and Macro Levels.” Pp. 337–55 in The Micro-Macro Link, edited by AlexanderJ. C.GiesenB.MünchR.SmelserN. J.Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
29.
GleickJ.1987. Chaos: Making a New Science.New York: Viking.
30.
GorbachevM.1988. Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World.New York: Harper and Row.
31.
GouldS. J.1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.New York: W. W. Norton.
32.
GouldS. J.1995. “Tempo and Mode in the Macroevolutionary Reconstruction of Darwinism.” Pp. 125–44 in Tempo and Mode in Evolution: Genetics and Paleontology 50 Years After Simpson, edited by FitchW. M.AyalaF. J.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
HabermasJ.1984. Reason and the Rationalization of Society, vol. 1 of The Theory of Communicative Action.Boston: Beacon Press.
35.
HabermasJ.1987. Reason and the Rationalization of Society, vol. 1 of The Theory of Communicative Action.Boston: Beacon Press.
36.
HallN., ed. 1991. Exploring Chaos: A Guide to the New Science of Disorder.New York and London: W. W. Norton.
37.
HellerM.NekrichA. M.1986. Utopia in Power: The History of the Soviet Union from 1917 to the Present.New York: Summit Books.
38.
JanosA. C.1986. Politics and Paradigms: Changing Theories of Change in Social Science.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39.
JoppkeC.1993. Mobilizing Against Nuclear Energy: A Comparison of Germany and the United States.Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
40.
JowittK.1992. New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction.Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
41.
KellertS. H.1993. In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
KoopmansR.2004. “Protest in Time and Space: The Evolution of Waves of Contention.” Pp. 19–46 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
43.
KotkinS.1995. Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization.Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
44.
LakoffG.JohnsonM.1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought.New York: Basic Books.
45.
LinzJ.1975. “Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes.” Pp. 175–411 in Macropolitical Theory, edited by GreensteinF. I.PolsbyN. W.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
46.
MakiyaK.1998. Republic of Fear: The Politics of Modern Iraq, 2nd ed.Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
McAdamD.1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N.1996. “Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes—Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements.” Pp. 1–20 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, edited by McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N.New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
McAdamD.TarrowS.TillyC.2001. Dynamics of Contention.Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N.1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.”American Journal of Sociology82:1212–41.
51.
MouzelisN. P.1995. Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnosis and Remedies.New York: Routledge.
52.
MurrellP.1993. “What is Shock Therapy? What Did it Do in Poland and Russia?”Post-Soviet Affairs9:111–40.
53.
PercivalI.1991. “Chaos: A Science for the Real World.” Pp. 11–21 in Exploring Chaos: A Guide to the New Science of Disorder, edited by HallN.New York: W. W. Norton.
54.
PrigogineI.StengersI.1984. Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature.New York: Bantam Books.
55.
PutnamR. D.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York: Simon & Schuster.
56.
RigbyT. H.1977. “Stalinism and the Mono-organizational Society.” Pp. 53–76 in Stalinism: Essays in Historical Interpretation, edited by TuckerR. C.New York and London: W. W. Norton.
57.
RingerF. K.1997. Max Weber's Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
SchapiroL.1971. The Communist Party of the Soviet Union: The First Comprehensive History of the Communist Party in Russia, revised ed.New York: Vintage.
59.
SewellW. H.1996. “Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology.” Pp. 245–80 in The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, edited by McDonaldT. J.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
60.
SkocpolT.1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SnowD. A.BenfordR. D.1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.”International Social Movement Research1:197–217.
62.
SnowD. A.RochfordE. B.Jr.WordenS. K.BenfordR. D.1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.”American Sociological Review51:464–81.
63.
SomersM. R.1996. “Where is Sociology After the Historic Turn? Knowledge Cultures, Narrativity, and Historical Epistemologies.” Pp. 53–89 in The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, edited by McDonaldT. J.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
64.
SunyR. G.1993. The Revenge of the Past: Nationalism, Revolution, and the Collapse of the Soviet Union.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65.
TarrowS. G.1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
TillyC.1978. From Mobilization to Revolution.Reading, MA and Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
67.
UseemB.1998. “Breakdown Theories of Collective Action.”American Review of Sociology24:215–38.
68.
WaldropM. M.1992. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos.New York: Simon and Schuster.
69.
WallersteinI.1997. “Social Science and the Quest for a Just Society.”American Journal of Sociology102:1241–58.
70.
WeberM.1977. Critique of Stammler, Translated by OakesG.New York: Free Press.
71.
WeberM.1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, 2 Vols., edited by RothG.WittichC., translated by FischoffE.. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
