While the size of states and the significance of ‘islandness’ have been of mild interest within the comparative study of politics and economics, the theoretical frameworks that operate within contemporary comparative analyses of welfare and social policy rest upon a largely unremarked assumption that population size does not matter. Explanations of and predictions for the development of welfare relations are undertaken in the belief that it is the ideological essence of welfare states that is important, and this national ‘character’ is established through concentration on the politics of class, sometimes gender, and occasionally ethnicity. However, it is often from the study of the small that important insight is generated and variation in universals can be found. Focusing on exemplars of the smallest national units, Cyprus, Iceland and Jersey, this article explores the significance of size and ‘islandness’ in welfare analysis. The findings of these country case studies expose aspects of the relationship between economics, geo-political strength and weakness, welfare state exceptionalism and hybridity and the social basis of welfare regime types which are less visible when size is not featured as an explanatory variable.
ArtsW. and GelissenJ., (2002), ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12 (2): 137–58.
CohenA.P., (1987), Whalsay: Symbol, Segment and Boundary in a Shetland Island Community, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
10.
DommenE., (1980), ‘Some distinguishing characteristics of island states’, World Development, 8: 931–43.
11.
Esping-AndersenG., (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.
12.
Esping-AndersenG., (1996), Welfare States in Transition, London: Sage.
13.
Esping-AndersenG., (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
GoffmanE., (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday life, London: Penguin (Reprinted 1990).
15.
HamptonM., (1998), ‘Mapping the Minefield: Theories of Island Offshore Finance Centres with reference to Jersey’ in BoweM.BriguglioL. and DeanJ.W. (eds), Banking and Finance in Islands and Small States, London: Pinter.
16.
HantraisL., (2004), Family Policy Matters, Responding to Family Changes in Europe, Bristol: The Policy Press.
HeidenheimerA.HecloH. and AdamsC.T., (1990), Comparative Public Policy, The Politics of Social Choice in America, Europe and Japan, Basingstoke: Macmillan Education Ltd.
IversenT., (2001), ‘The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion: Trade Openness, Deindustrialization and Partisan Politics’ in PiersonP. (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
JonesE., (2008), Economic Adjustment and Political Transformation in Small States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
JonssonG., (2001), ‘The Icelandic welfare state in the Twentieth century’, Scandinavian Journal of History, 26 (3): 249–67.
23.
KatzensteinP., (1985), Small States in World Markets, Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
24.
KatzensteinP., (2003), ‘Small states and small states revisited’, New Political Economy, 8 (1): 9–30.
25.
KellardK.AdelmanL.HartfreeY. and MiddletonS., (2001). The 2001 Budget Standards for Different Household Types in Jersey, CRSP433 Final Report Centre for Research in Social Policy: Loughborough University.
ObingerH.StarkeP.MoserJ.BogedanC.GindulisE. and LeibfriedS., (eds) (2010), Transformations of the Welfare State: Small States Big Lessons, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
OECD, (2009), Economic Survey of Iceland 2009, Policy Brief, September 2009, Paris: OECD.
34.
ÓlafssonS., (1993), ‘Variations within the Scandinavian model: Iceland in the Scandinavian perspective’International Journal of Sociology, 22 (4): 61–88.
35.
ÓlafssonS., (2003), ‘Contemporary Icelanders – Scandinavian or American?’Scandinavian Review; Summer 2003; 91, 1; Academic Research Library: 6–14.
36.
ÓlafssonS., (2005), ‘Normative foundations of the Icelandic welfare state: On the gradual erosion of citizenship-based welfare rights’ in 1985KuhnleS. and KildalN., Normative Foundations of the Nordic Welfare States, London: Routledge.
37.
OorschotW.van OpielkaM. and Pfau-EffingerB., (eds), (2008), Culture and Welfare State, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
38.
OttD., (2000), Small is Democratic, An Examination of State Size and Democratic Development, New York: Garland Publishing.
39.
PalmarsdottirB., (1991), Independence and Interdependence: Iceland and the EC, Reading Papers in Politics, Occasional Paper No 8, Department of Politics: University of Reading.
40.
PálssonG. and DurrenbergerE.P., (eds.), (1996), Images of contemporary Iceland, everyday lives and global contexts, Iowa: University of Iowa Press.
41.
PantelliS., (2005), The History of Modern Cyprus, New Barnet: Topline Publishing.
42.
PiersonP., (ed.), (2001), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
PiersonP., (2004), Politics in Time, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
44.
PrasadN., (2007), Research Proposal and Project Document: Social policies in small states, A joint project of the Commonwealth Secretariat & United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).
ReadR., (2004), ‘The implications of increasing globalization and regionalism for the economic growth of small island states’, World Development, 32 (2): 365–378.
48.
RobertsonR. and LechnerF., (1985), ‘Modernization, globalization and the problem of culture in world-systems theory’, Theory, Culture and Society, 2 (3): 103–118.
49.
SchmidtV., (2003), ‘How, where and when does discourse matter in small states' welfare state adjustment?’New Political Economy, 8 (1): 127–46.
50.
SelwynP., (1980), ‘Smallness and islandness’, World Development, 8 (12): 945–951.
51.
SiaroffA., (1994), ‘Work, welfare and gender equality: A new typology’ in SainsburyD., Gendering welfare states, London: Sage.
