Interspecies Entities and the Politics of Nature

Agamben G. , (2004), The Open: Man and Animal, Attell Kevin (trans.), Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Barnes B. , (1983), ‘On the Conventional Character of Knowledge and Cognition’ in Knorr-Cetina K.D. and Mulkay M. (eds), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, London: Sage.

Benton T. and Redfearn S. , (1996), ‘The Politics of Animal Rights – Where is the Left?’ New Left Review, 215: 43–58.

Bowker G.C. and Star S.L. , (1999), Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, London: MIT Press.

Brown N. , (2009), ‘Beasting the Embryo: the metrics of humanness in the transpecies embryo debate’, Biosocieties, 4(2–3): 147–163.

Brown N. and Michael M. , (2001), ‘Switching Between Science and Culture in Transpecies Transplantation’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(1): 3–22.

Dupré J. , (1993), The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science, London: Harvard University Press.

Dupré J. , (2002), Humans and Other Animals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fox M. , (2005), ‘Reconfiguring the Animal/Human Boundary: The Impact of Xeno Technologies’, Liverpool Law Review, 26: 149–167.

Franklin S. Lury C. and Stacey J. , (eds), (2000), Global Nature, Global Culture, London: Sage.

Haraway D. , (1991), Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, London: Free Association Press.

Haraway D. , (2008), When Species Meet, London: University of Minnesota Press.

Holmberg T. , (2005), ‘Questioning the “Number of the Beast”: Constructions of Humanness in the Human Genome Project (HGP) narrative’, Science as Culture, 14(1): 23–37.

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, (2007), Government Proposals for the Regulations of Hybrid and Chimera Embryos, Fifth Report of Session 2006–2007, 05 April 2007, (assessed 25 March 2008) http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmsctech/272/272i.pdf

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, (2007), Hybrids and Chimeras: A Consultation on the Ethical and Social Implications of Creating Human/Animal Embryos in Research, London: Crown Copyright.

Marks J. , (2002), What It Means To Be 98 per cent Chimpanzee: Apes, People and their Genes, London: University of California Press.

Parry S. , (2009), ‘Stem Cell Scientists’ Discursive Strategies for Cognitive Authority’, Science as Culture, 18(1): 89–114.

Strathern M. , (1992), Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Roberts C. and Throsby K. , (2007), ‘Paid to Share: IVF Patients, Eggs and Stem Cell Research’, Social Science & Medicine, 66: 159–169.

Wilmut I. Campbell K. and Tudge C. , (2000), The Second Creation: The Age of Biological Control by the Scientists Who Created Dolly, London: Headline.