Defining Stem Cells? Scientists and Their Classifications of Nature

Adams G.B. and Scadden D.T. , (2006), ‘The Hematopoietic Stem Cell in Its Place’, Nature Immunology, 7: 333–7.

Alison M. Poulsom R. Otto W. Vig P. Brittan M. Direkze N. Preston S. and Wright N. , (2003), ‘Plastic Adult Stem Cells: Will they Graduate from the School of Hard Knocks?’, Journal of Cell Science, 116: 599–603.

Ankeny R. and Dodds S. , (2008), ‘Hearing Community Voices: Public Engagement in Australian Human Embryo Research Policy, 2005–2007’, New Genetics and Society, 27: 217–32.

Aoi T. Yae K. Nakagawa M. Ichisaka T. Okita K. Takahashi K. Chiba T. and Yamanaka S. , (2008), ‘Generation of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Mouse Liver and Stomach Cells’, Science, 321: 699–702.

Barnes B. , (1983), ‘On the Conventional Character of Knowledge and Cognition,’ in Knorr-Cetina K.D. and Mulkay M. (eds.), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, London: Sage.

Barnes B. , (2002), ‘Searle on Social Reality: Process Is Prior to Product’, in Grewendorf G. and Meggle G. (eds), Speech Acts, Mind, and Social Reality: Discussions with John R. Searle, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Barnes B. Bloor D. and Henry J. , (1996), Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis, London: Athlone.

Barnes B. and Edge D. , (eds), (1982), Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Bender W. Hauskeller C. and Manzei A. , (eds.), Crossing Borders: Cultural, Religious and Political Differences Concerning Stem Cell Research, A Global Approach, Münster: Agenda Verlag.

Bloor D. , (1976), Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd edn, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Borup M. Brown N. Konrad K. and Lente H.V. , (2006), ‘The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18: 285–98.

Brown N. , (1999), ‘Xenotransplantation: Normalizing Disgust’, Science as Culture, 8: 327–57.

Brown N. and Kraft A. , (2006), ‘Blood Ties: Banking the Stem Cell Promise’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18: 313–27.

Brown N. and Michael M. , (2003), ‘A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15: 3–18.

Castree N. and Braun B. , (1998), Chapter 1: The Construction of Nature and the Nature of Construction: Analytical and Political Tools for Building Survivable Futures. Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium, London: Routledge.

Collins H.M. and Pinch T.J. , (1993), The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Commonwealth of Australia, (2002a), Research Involving Human Embryos Act, Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Commonwealth of Australia, (2002b), Prohibition of Human Cloning Act, Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Commonwealth of Australia, (2006), Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Act, Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Davies S. McCallie E. Simonsson E. Lehr J.L. and Duensing S. , (2009), ‘Discussing Dialogue: Perspectives on the Value of Science Dialogue Events that do not Inform Policy’, Public Understanding of Science, 18: 338–53.

Dodds S. and Ankeny R.A. , (2006), ‘Regulation of Hesc Research in Australia: Promises and Pitfalls for Deliberative Democratic Approaches’, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 3: 95–107.

Ebert A.D. Yu J. Rose F.F. Mattis V.B. Lorson C.L. Thomson J.A. and Svendsen C.N. , (2009), ‘Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from a Spinal Muscular Atrophy Patient’, Nature, 457: 277–80.

Eriksson L. and Webster A. , (2008), ‘Standardizing the Unknown: Practicable Pluripotency as Doable Futures’, Science as Culture, 17: 57–69.

Fagan M.B. , (2007a), ‘The Search for the Hematopoietic Stem Cell: Social Interaction and Epistemic Success in Immunology’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38: 217–37.

Fagan M.B. , (2007b), Social Epistemology of Scientific Inquiry: Beyond Historical Vs. Philosophical Case Studies. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00003586/01/mbf_&HPS1.pdf (accessed 13 Jan 10).

Gieryn T. , (1983), ‘Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists’, American Sociological Review, 48: 781–95.

Gieryn T. , (1995), ‘Boundaries of Science’, in Jasanoff S. Markle G. Petersen J. and Pinch T. (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, London: Sage.

Gieryn T. , (1999), Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line, Chicago, London: Chicago University Press.

Gilbert N.G. and Mulkay M. , (1984), Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse, London: Cambridge University Press.

Goven J. , (2006), ‘Processes of Inclusion, Cultures of Calculation, Structures of Power; Scientific Citizenship and the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31: 565–98.

Haraway D.J. , (1997), Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.Femaleman©Meets_Oncomouse™: Feminism and Technoscience, Routledge: New York.

Harvey O. , (2005), ‘Regulating Stem-Cell Research and Human Cloning in an Australian Context: An Exercise in Protecting the Status of the Human Subject’, New Genetics & Society, 24: 125–36.

Harvey O. , (2008), ‘Regulating Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning in an Australian Context: The Lockhart Review’, New Genetics and Society, 27: 33–42.

Hauskeller C. , (2005a), ‘The Language of Stem Cell Science’, in Bender W. Hauskeller C. and Manzei A. (eds), Crossing Borders: Cultural Religious and Political Differences Concerning Stem Cell Research, A Global Approach. Münster: Agenda Verlag.

Hauskeller C. , (2005b), ‘Science in Touch: Functions of Biomedical Terminology’, Biology and Philosophy, 20: 815–35.

Hauskeller C. Bender W. and Manzei A. (eds), (2005), Crossing Borders. Grenzüberschreitungen, Munster: Agenda Verlag.

House of Lords, (2000), Science and Technology Committee, Third Report, Science and Society, Session 1999–2000, HL 38.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, (1990), Statutory Instrument 1991, No. 1781.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Research Purposes) Regulations, (2001), Statutory Instrument 2001, No. 188.

Irwin A. , (2006), ‘The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the “New” Scientific Governance’, Social Studies of Science, 36: 299–320.

Janzen V. and Scadden D.T. , (2006), ‘Stem Cells: Good, Bad and Reformable’, Nature 441(7092): 418–19.

Jasanoff S. , (2003), Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva, 41: 233–44.

Jasanoff S. , (2005), Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jiang Y. Jahagirdar B.N. Reinhardt R.L. Schwartz R.E. Keene C.D. Ortiz-Gonzalez X.R. Reyes M. Lenvik T. Lund T. Blackstad M. Du J. Aldrich S. Lisberg A. Low W.C. Largaespada D.A. and Verfaillie C.M. , (2002), ‘Pluripotency of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Adult Marrow’, Nature, 418: 41–9.

Joly P.B. and Kaufmann A. , (2008), ‘Lost in Translation? The Need for “Upstream Engagement” with Nanotechnology on Trial’, Science as Culture, 17: 225–47.

Kitzinger J. and Williams C. , (2005), ‘Forecasting Science Futures: Legitimising Hope and Calming Fears in the Embryo Stem Cell Debate’, Social Science & Medicine, 61: 731–40.

Lajtha L.G. , (1983), ‘Stem Cell Concepts’, in Potten C.S. (ed.), Stem Cells: Their Identification and Characterisation, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

Leach M. Scoones I. and Wynne B. , (eds.), (2005), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, London: Zed Books.

Marks N. , (2008), Opening up Spaces for Reflexivity? Scientists' Discourses About Stem Cell Research and Public Engagement, University of Edinburgh, unpublished PhD thesis.

Martin P. Brown N. and Kraft A. , (2008), ‘From Bedside to Bench? Communities of Promise, Translational Research and the Making of Blood Stem Cells’, Science as Culture, 17:29–41.

Morley K.I. and Hall W. , (2003), ‘Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Therapeutic Cloning: The Australian Debate’, Plaintiff, 55: 20–23.

Mulkay M. , (1994), ‘Triumph of the Pre-Embryo: Interpretations of the Human Embryo in Parliamentary Debate over Embryo Research’, Social Studies of Science, 24: 611–39.

Nelkin D. , (1975), ‘The Political Impact of Technical Expertise’, Social Studies of Science, 5: 35–54.

Parliament of Australia, S., (2002), Provisions of the Research Involving Embryos and Prohibition of Human Cloning Bill; Supplementary Report in Favour of the Legislation, http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/clac_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002–04/emb_cloning/report/d02.htm (accessed 13 Jan 10).

Parry S. , (2003a), Debating Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning: Multiple Meanings, Competing Constructions, University of Edinburgh, unpublished PhD thesis.

Parry S. , (2003b), ‘The Politics of Cloning: Mapping the Rhetorical Convergence of Embryos and Stem Cells in Parliamentary Debates’, New Genetics and Society, 22: 145–68.

Parry S. , (2009), ‘Stem Cell Scientists’ Discursive Strategies for Cognitive Authority’, Science as Culture, 18: 89–114.

Robins R . (2005), ‘Biomedical Innovation or Bioethical Precaution: The Stem Cell Debate in Australia’, in Bender W. Hauskeller C. and Manzei A. , (eds.), Crossing Borders: Cultural, Religious and Political Differences Concerning Stem Cell Research, A Global Approach, Münster: Agenda Verlag.

Rubin B.P. , (2008), ‘Therapeutic Promise in the Discourse of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research’, Science as Culture, 17: 13–27.

Science as Culture, (2008), ‘Special Issue: Stem Cell Stories 1998–2008’, Science as Culture, 17.

Selin C. , (2007), ‘Expectations and the Emergence of Nanotechnology’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32: 196–220.

Shapin S. , (1995), ‘Trust, Honesty, and the Authority of Science’, in Bulger R.E. Bobbya E.M. and Fineberg H. (eds), Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine, Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Star S.L. , (1985), ‘Scientific Work and Uncertainty’, Social Studies of Science, 15: 391–427.

Trounson A. , (2006), ‘The Production and Directed Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells’, Endocrinological Reviews, 27: 208–19.

Van Dyck J. , (1995), Manufacturing Babies and Public Consent: Debating the New Reproductive Technologies, Basingstoke: MacMillan.

Wynne B. , (1996), ‘May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide’, in Lash S. Szerszynski B. and Wynne B. (eds), Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, London: Sage.

Wynne B. , (2006), ‘Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science - Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?’ Community Genetics, 9: 211–20.

Zipori D. , (2005), ‘The Stem State: Plasticity Is Essential, Whereas Self-Renewal and Hierarchy Are Optional’, Stem Cells, 23: 719–26.