AdgerW. N.DessaiS.HulmeM.KohlerJ.TurnpennyJ.WarrenR., (2003), Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. In Defining and experiencing dangerous climate change: An editorial essay, http://www.tyndall.uea.ac.uk/publications/working_papers/wp28.pdf Accessed 12 February 2007.
AndersonK.BowsA., (2008), Reframing the climate change challenge in light of post-2000 emission trends, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 13 November 2008vol. 366no. 18823863–3882.
Boehmer-ChristiansenS., (1994), Global Environmental Protection Policy: The limits of scientific advice, Part 1', Environmental Change4 (2): 140–159.
7.
BookchinM., (1987), The modern crisis, Black Rose Books.
8.
BrayD.ShackleyS., (2004), Working Paper 58: The Social Simulation of the Public Perception of Weather Events and their Effect upon the Development of Belief in Anthropogenic Climate Change, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
9.
BrownD., (2003), The precautionary principle as a guide to environmental impact analysis: Lessons learned from global warming in Precaution, Environmental Science and Preventive Public Policy, TicknerJ. (ed.), London: Island Press: 141–156.
10.
ChristoforouT., (2003), The precautionary principle in European community law and science in Precaution, Environmental Science and Preventive Public, TicknerJ. (ed.), London: Island Press: 241–262.
11.
DouglasM.WildavskyA., (1982), Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers, University of California Press.
FuntowiczS.RavetzJ., (1993), Science for the Post-Normal Age, Future, 25/7: 735–755.
17.
FuntowiczS.RavetzJ., (1994), The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a post-normal science, Ecological economicsVol: 10197–207.
18.
GerhardsaJ.LengfeldbH., (2008), Support for European Union Environmental Policy by Citizens of EU-Member and Accession States', Comparative Sociology7: 215–241.
19.
HansenJ.SatoM.KharechaP.BeerlingD.BernerR.Masson-DelmotteV.PaganiM.RaymoM.RoyerD.ZachosJ., (2007), Clarion Caller; An interview with renowned climate scientist James HansenGrist, http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2007/05/15/hansen/ Accessed 24 May 2007.
HarveyL. D. D., (2007a), Dangerous anthropogenic interference, dangerous climatic change, and harmful climatic change: Non-trivial distinctions with significant policy implications', Climatic Change82: 1–25.
24.
HarveyL. D. D., (2007b), Allowable CO2 concentrations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change as a function of the climate sensitivity probability distribution function, Environmental Research Letters 2.
25.
HoppeR., (2008), Lost in translation? A boundary work perspective on making climate change governable in Workshop: Climate change and the science policy interface, Personal communication, 30th January, 2009.
26.
HulmeM., (2007), Understanding climate change – the power and the limit of science. In Weather, September 2007, Vol. 62, No. 9: 243–244.
27.
JordanA., (2008), ‘An ever more environmental union amongst the peoples of Europe?’, Environmental Politics, 17: 3: 485–491.
28.
KaiserM., (2003), Ethics, Science and Precaution: A view from Norway in TicknerJ., (ed.), Precaution, Environmental Science and Preventive Public Policy, London: Island Press; 39–53.
29.
KhunT., (1970), The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
30.
LahdeV., (2006), Gardens, climate changes and cultures in HailaY.DykeC. (eds), 2006How Nature Speaks: The Dynamics of the Human Ecological Condition, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
31.
LatourB., (2004), Why has critique run out of steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern, Critical Inquiry30.
32.
LynasM., (2007), 6 degrees: Our future on a hotter planet, London: Fourth Estate.
MossR., (1995), Avoiding ‘dangerous’ interference in the climate system: The roles of values, science and policy, Global Environmental Change, Vol 5, No.1: 3–6.
35.
NewellP., (2000), Climate for Change: Non-state actors and the global politics of the greenhouse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
NordhausW. D., (1991), To Slow or Not to Slow: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect', The Economic Journal101: 920–937.
37.
O'BrienM., (2003), Science in the service of good: The precautionary principle and positive goals in TicknerJ., (ed.), Precaution, Environmental Science and Preventive Public Policy, London: Island Press: 279–296.
38.
OppenheimerM., (2005), Defining Dangerous Anthropogenic Interference: The role of science, the limits of science, Risk Analysis, Vol. 25, No. 6: 1399–1407.
39.
OppenheimerM.PetsonkA., (2005), Article 2 of the UNFCCC: Historical origins, recent interpretations', Climatic Change73: 195–226.
40.
PachauriJ., (2007), Even Tougher Warming Curbs May Be Needed, Reuters News Service, October 2nd 2007.
41.
PearceF., (2007), The last generation. How nature will take her revenge for climate change, Eden Project Books.
42.
PettengerM., (2007), The Netherlands Climate Change Policy: Constructing themselves/constructing climate change in PettengerM. (ed.), The social construction of climate change. Power, Knowledge, Norms, Discourses (Global Environmental Governance), Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited: 51–74.
43.
QuijanoR., (2003), Elements of the precautionary principle in Precaution, Environmental Science and Preventive Public Policy, TicknerJ. (ed.), London: Island Press: 21–28.
44.
RamathanV.FengY., (2008), On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: Formidable challenges ahead, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, No. 38: 14245–14250.
45.
RainoM., (2008), Climate science and the way we ought to think about danger, Environmental Politics, 17: 4660–4672.
46.
RavetzJ., (2006), Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability, Ecological Complexity, 3(4): 275–284.
SchneiderS., (2008), ‘Dangerous’ Climate Change: Key Vulnerabilities in ZedilloE., (ed.), Global Warming: Looking Beyond Kyoto, Brookings Institution Press and Yale Center for the Study of Globalization.
50.
ShotterJ., (2006), ‘Participative Thinking: “Seeing the Face” and “Hearing the Voice” of Nature’ in HailaY.DykeC. (eds), How Nature Speaks: The Dynamics of the Human Ecological Condition, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
51.
SingerF.AveryD., (2007), Unstoppable Global Warming, London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
52.
SmithH., (2007), Disrupting the global discourse of climate change: The case of indigenous voices in M. Pettenger, The Social Construction of Climate Change: Power, Knowledge, Norms, Discourses (Global Environmental Governance), Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited: 149–172.
StippleJ.PatersonM., (2007), Singing Climate change into existence: On the territorialization of climate policymaking in PettengerM. (ed.), The Social Construction of Climate Change: Power, Knowledge, Norms, Discourses (Global Environmental Governance), Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Van der SluijsJ.van EijndhovenJ.ShackleyS.WynneB., (1998), Anchoring Devices in Science for Policy: The Case of Consensus around Climate Sensitivity', Social Studies of Science28: 291–323.
60.
WalkerG.KingD., (2008), The hot topic. How to tackle global warming and still keep the lights on, London: Bloomsbury.
61.
WBGU, (1995), Scenario for the derivation of global CO2 reduction targets and implementation strategies. Statement on the occasion of the First Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change in Berlin, http://www.wbgu.de/wbgu_sn1995_engl.pdf Accessed 28 January 2007.
62.
WBGU, (1997), Targets for Climate Protection, 1997. A Study for the Third Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change in Kyoto, http://www.wbgu.de/wbgu_sn1997_engl.pdf Accessed 28 January 2007.
WeartS., (2003), The Discovery of Global Warming, London: Cambridge University Press.
65.
WellmerA., (1983), The critique of critical theory: Reason, utopia and the dialectic, Praxis International, Vol 3, No 2: 83–107.
66.
WilligC., (1998), Social constructionism and revolutionary socialism: A contradiction in terms? in ParkerI. (ed.), Social constructionism, discourse and realism, London: Sage: 91–104.