CahillS., (2000–1), ‘Give me my space: Implications for permitting national appropriation of the geostationary orbit’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 19: 231–48.
5.
CarterP., (1987), The Road to Botany Bay: An Essay in Spatial History, London: Faber.
6.
ChartrandM., (2004), Satellite Communications for the Nonspecialist. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE Press.
7.
ChengB., (1997), Studies in International Space Law, Oxford: Clarendon.
8.
DelaneyD., (2001), ‘Running with the land: Legal-historical imagination and the spaces of modernity’, Journal of Historical Geography, 27(4): 493–506.
9.
EzorJ., (1992/3), ‘Costs overhead: Tonga's claiming of sixteen geostationary orbital sites and the implications for U.S. space policy’, Law and Policy in International Business, 24: 915–42.
10.
FoucaultM., (1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, Brighton: Harvester.
GallowayE., (2000), ‘Organizing the United States government for outer space: 1957–1958’, in LauniusR.LogsdonJ.SmithR. (eds), Reconsidering S putnik: Forty Years Since the Soviet Satellite. London: Routledge, 309–26.
13.
GormanR., (2001), Great Debates at the United Nations: An encyclopedia of fifty key issues, 1945–2000, Connecticut, USA and London: Greenwood.
14.
GoroveS., (1979), ‘The geostationary orbit: Issues of law and policy’, American Journal of International Law, 73: 444–61.
15.
GrunerB., (2004), ‘A new hope for international space law: Incorporating nineteenth century first possession principles into the 1967 space treaty for the colonization of space in the twentieth century’, Seton Hall Law Review, 35: 299–357.
16.
HarrisA.HarrisR., (2006), ‘The need for air space and outer space demarcation’, Space Policy, 22: 3–7.
17.
HerberC., (1991), ‘The common heritage principle: Antarctica and the developing nations’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 50(4): 392–406.
18.
JakhuR., (2007), ‘Legal issues of satellite telecommunications, the geostationary orbit, and space debris’, Astropolitics: The International Journal of Space Politics and Policy, 5: 173–208.
19.
JasentuliyanaN., (1999), International space law and the United Nations. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
20.
JenningsR., (1963), The Acquisition of Territory in International Law, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
21.
JoynerC., (1986), ‘Legal implications of the concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 35(1): 190–99.
22.
KelsoT., (1998), ‘Basics of the geostationary orbit’, Satellite Times, 4(7): 76–7.
23.
KleinH., (1959), ‘Cujus est solum ejus est … quousque tandem?’Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 26: 237–54.
24.
LatchfordS., (1959), ‘The bearing of international air navigation conventions on the use of outer space’, The American Journal of International Law, 53(2): 405–11.
25.
LefebvreH., (1991), The Production of Space, translated by Nicholson-SmithDonald, Oxford: Blackwell.
26.
LevinH., (1991), ‘Trading orbit spectrum assignments in the space satellite industry’, American Economic Review, 81(2): 42–5.
27.
LissitzynO., (1962), ‘Some legal implications of the U-2 and RB-47 incidents’, The American Journal of International Law, 56(1): 135–42.
28.
MacDonaldF., (2007), ‘Anti-Astropolitik: Outer space and the orbit of geography’, Progress in Human Geography, 31(5): 592–615.
29.
MarkoD., (1992/3), ‘A kinder, gentler Moon Treaty: A critical review of the Moon Treaty and a proposed alternative’,Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Law, 8: 293–346.
30.
O'TuathailG., (1996), Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space, Minneapolis: Minneapolis University Press.
31.
ParkA., (2006), ‘Incremental steps for achieving space security: The need for a new way of thinking to enhance the legal regime for space’, Houston Journal of International Law, 28(3): 871–911.
32.
ParksL., (2005), Cultures in Orbit: Satellites and the Televisual, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
PetersonM., (1997), ‘The use of analogies in developing outer space law’, International Organization, 51(2): 245–74.
34.
PueW., (1990), ‘Wrestling with Law: (Geographical) Specificity versus (Legal) Abstraction’, Urban Geography, 11(6): 566–85.
35.
ReynoldsG., (1998), ‘Space property rights: An activist's approach’, To The Stars (Sept/Oct): 19–21.
36.
SchickF., (1961), ‘Space law and space politics’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 10(4): 681–706.
37.
SoroosM., (1982), ‘The Commons in the Sky: The Radio Spectrum and Geosynchronous Orbit as Issues in Global Policy’, International Organization, 36(3): 665–77.
38.
StoneC., (2006), ‘Orbital strike constellations: The future of space supremacy and national defense’, The Space Review, available at: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/628/1 [accessed 10th April 2007].
39.
ThompsonJ., (1996), ‘Space for rent: The international telecommunications union, space law, and orbit/spectrum leasing’, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 62: 279–311.
40.
TriggsG., (1986), International Law and Australian Sovereignty in Antarctica, Sydney: Legal Books.
41.
United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (1967), Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, available at: http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/SpaceLaw/outerspt.html [accessed 10 June 2008].
42.
United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (2008), ‘Online Index of Objects Launched into Outer Space’, available at: http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/osoindex.html [accessed: 3 October 2008].
43.
WaiteB.RowanF., (1986), ‘International communications law, part two: Satellite regulation and the space WARC’, International Law, 20: 341–65.
44.
WarfB., (2006), ‘International competition between satellite and fiber optic carriers: A geographic perspective’, The Professional Geographer, 58(1): 1–11.
45.
WarfB., (2007), ‘Geopolitics of the satellite industry’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(3): 385–97.
46.
WassenberghH., (1991), Principles of Outer Space Law in Hindsight, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
47.
WiessnerS., (1983), ‘The public order of the geostationary orbit: Blueprints for the future’, The Yale Journal of World Public Order, 9(2): 217–74.
48.
WilesG., (1998), ‘The man on the Moon makes room for neighbors: An analysis of the existence of property rights on the Moon under a condominium-type ownership theory’, International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 12(3): 513–34.