This paper explores the place and meaning of mobile phones within friendship relations amongst young Pakistani-British women and men. In particular it focuses on the ways in which friendship relations are transformed and reconfigured through new mobile phone technologies; and how ‘doing’ friendship on the mobile uncovers significant insight into contemporary youth cultures of masculinity and femininity. Although the majority of young people of the ‘multimedia generation’ have fully engaged with the mobile telephony revolution, there is no work which grounds mobile phone use within theoretical perspectives on friendship, in particular in different peer group cultures. We draw upon new empirical data from research in the North East of England to explore young people's perceptions and uses of mobile phones. The resulting narratives reveal interesting gendered practices of connectivity and sociability amongst the sample group and important dimensions of developing peer group identities, including diverse performance of femininities and masculinities. Building on these ideas, this paper aims to make a theoretical contribution to debates on friendship and mobile phone use. In particular, we argue for the need to ground the empirical study of young people and mobile phones more firmly within social theory: a development that contributes towards a sharpening of theoretical perspectives on mobile technologies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottC., (2004), ‘Making Connections: Young People and the Internet’, in Sefton-GreenJ. (ed.), Digital Diversions: Youth Culture in the Age of Multimedia. London: Routledge, 84–105.
2.
AdamsR.G., (1998), ‘The demise of territorial determinism: Online friendships’, in AdamsR.G.AllanG. (eds), Placing Friendship in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–182.
3.
AlexanderC.E., (2000), The Asian Gang: Ethnicity, Identity, Masculinity, Oxford: Berg.
4.
AllanG., (1996), Kinship and Friendship in Modern Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
AllanG., (1998), ‘Friendship, sociology and social structure’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15 (5): 685–702.
6.
BaileyL., (1999), ‘Refracted Selves: A Study of Changes in Self-Identity in the Transition to Motherhood’, Sociology, 33 (2): 335–352.
BrahA., (1996), Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities, London: Routledge.
10.
CampbellR., (2006), ‘Teenage Girls and Cellular Phones: Discourses of Independence, Safety and “Rebellion” ‘, Journal of Youth Studies, 9 (2): 195–212.
11.
CharlesN.DaviesC.A., (2005), ‘Studying the particular, illuminating the general: Community studies and community in Wales’, The Sociological Review, 53 (4): 672–690.
12.
CoatesJ., (1996), Women Talk, Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
CollinsonD.L.HearnJ., (1996), ‘“Men” at “work”: Multiple masculinities / multiple workplaces’, in Mac an GhaillM. (ed.), Understanding Masculinities: Social Relations and Cultural Arenas. Buckingham: Open University Press, 61–76.
14.
DelantyG., (2003), Community, London: Routledge.
15.
Eriksson-ZetterquistU.KnightsD., (2004), ‘Stories about men implementing and resisting new technologies’, New Technology, Work and Employment, 19 (3): 192–206.
16.
FoxK., (2001), ‘Evolution, Alienation and Gossip’ in The role of mobile telecommunications in the 21st century, Oxford: Social Issues Research Centre, http://www.sirc.org/publik/gossip.shtml (downloaded 17.04.08)
17.
FrissenV., (1995), ‘Gender is calling: Some reflections on past, present and future uses of the telephone’, in GillR.GrintK. (eds), The Gender-technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. London: Taylor and Francis, 79–94.
18.
FroshS.PhoenixA.PattmanR., (2002), Young Masculinities: Understanding Boys in Contemporary Society, Hampshire: Palgrave.
19.
FurlongA.CartmelF., (1997), Young People and Social Change: Individualisation and Risk in Late Modernity, Buckingham: Open University Press.
20.
GiddensA., (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
GillR.GrintK., (eds), (1995), The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research, London: Taylor and Francis.
22.
GoodmanR.F.Ben-Ze-EvA., (eds), (1994), Good Gossip, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.
23.
GreenE., (1998), ‘“Women Doing Friendship”: An Analysis of Women's Leisure as a site of identity construction, empowerment and resistance’, Leisure Studies, 17: 171–185.
24.
GreenE.HebronS.WoodwardD., (1990), Women's Leisure, What Leisure?Hampshire: Macmillan.
25.
GreenE.SingletonE., (2006), ‘Risky Bodies at Leisure: Young Women negotiating Space and Place’, Sociology, 40 (5): 853–871.
26.
GreenE.SingletonC., (2007), ‘Mobile Selves: Gender, ethnicity and mobile phones in the everyday lives of young Pakistani Muslim women and men’, Information, Communication and Society, 10 (4): 506–526.
27.
GreenN., (2002), ‘Who's Watching Whom? Monitoring and Accountability in Mobile Relations’, in BrownB.GreenN.HarperR. (eds), Wireless World. UK: Springer-Verlag, 32–45.
28.
HamptonK.N., (2007), ‘Neighborhoods in the Network Society: The E-Neighbors study’, Information, Communication and Society, 10 (5): 714–748.
29.
HaywoodC.Mac an GhaillM., (2003), Men and Masculinities: Theory, Research and Social Practice, Buckingham: Open University Press.
30.
HeyV., (1997), The Company She Keeps: An Ethnography of Girls' Friendship, Buckingham: Open University Press.
31.
JamiesonL.MorganD.CrowG.AllanG., (2006), ‘Friends, Neighbours and Distant Partners: Extending or Decentring Family Relationships?Sociological Research Online11 (3), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/11/3/jamieson.html (downloaded 17.04.08),
32.
KennedyH., (2005), ‘Subjective Intersections in the Face of the Machine: Gender, Race, Class and PCs in the Home’, European Journal of Women's Studies, 12 (4): 471–487.
33.
KruegerR.A.CaseyM.A., (2000), Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, London: Sage.
LemishD.CohenA.A., (2005), ‘On the Gendered Nature of Mobile Phone Culture in Israel’, Sex Roles, 52 (7/8): 511–521.
36.
LicoppeC., (2004), ‘“Connected” presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape’, Environment and Planning D, 22: 135–156.
37.
LingR., (1998), ‘“She calls, [but] it's for both of us you know”: The use of traditional fixed and mobile telephony for social networking among Norwegian parents’, Kjeller: Telenor Rand Dhttp://www.richardling.com/papers/1998_it_is_for_both.pdf (downloaded 17.04.08)
38.
LingR., (2004), The Mobile Connection: The Cell Phone's Impact on Society, San Francisco: Elsevier.
39.
LohanM., (2001), ‘Men, Masculinities and “Mundane” Technologies: The Domestic Telephone’ in GreenE.AdamA. (eds), Virtual Gender: Technology, Consumption and Identity. London: Routledge, 189–205.
40.
McRobbieA.GarberJ., (1976), ‘Girls and Subcultures’, in HallS.JeffersonT. (eds), Resistance through Rituals: Youth subcultures in post-war Britain. London: Hutchinson, 209–222.
41.
McRobbieA., (2000), Feminism and Youth Culture (2nd edition), Hampshire: Macmillan.
42.
MarvinC., (1988), When Old Technologies were New: Thinking about Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century, Oxford: OUP.
43.
MorganD., (2005), ‘Revisiting “Communities in Britain” ‘, The Sociological Review, 53 (4): 641–657.
44.
MoyalA., (1992), ‘The Gendered Use of the Telephone: An Australian Case Study’, Media, Culture and Society, 14: 51–72.
45.
NardiP., (1992), ‘“Seamless Souls”An Introduction to Men's Friendships’ in NardiP. (ed.), Men's Friendships. London: Sage, 1–14.
46.
NayakA., (2003), Race, Place and Globalization: Youth Cultures in a Changing World, Oxford: Berg.
47.
Ofcom, (2006), The Consumer Experience Research Report, London: Ofcom.
48.
PahlR., (2000), On Friendship, Cambridge: Polity Press.
49.
RakowL.F., (1992), Gender on the line: Women, the Telephone and Community Life, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
50.
SavageM.BagnallG.LonghurstB., (2005), Globalisation and Belonging, London: Sage.
51.
ShawA., (2000), Kinship and Continuity: Pakistani Families in Britain, London: Routledge.
52.
SkeggsB., (1997), Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable, London: Sage.
53.
SmoredaZ.LicoppeC., (2000), ‘Gender-Specific Use of the Domestic Telephone’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 63 (3): 238–252.
54.
SpencerL.PahlR., (2006), Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
55.
TannenD., (1991), You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation, London: Virago.
