Recent policy shifts in higher education impact on the diversity of student experiences, one such trend is an increase in the number of students staying in their parental home for the duration of their studies. This has implications for students’ experiences of university life, particularly non-academic aspects. Drawing on Bourdieu's theory of practice and habitus, this papers explores how young people go about fitting in to ‘being a student’, and how predispositions to university life influence these practices. Residential status emerges as a key demarcating factor in how successfully students feel they adapt to being at university. Though related to class, this cannot be explained solely by the socio-economic background of students living at home, but rather reflects both practical problems faced by these students as well as difficulties in incorporating a student habitus while living at home.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderJ., (1995), Fin de Siècle: Social Theory Relativism, Reduction and the Problem of Reason, London: Verso.
2.
ArcherL.HutchingsM. and RossA., (2002), Higher Education and Social Class, London: Routlege.
3.
BallS.DaviesJ.DaviesM. and ReayD., (2002), “‘Classification” and “Judgement”: social class and the “cognitive structures” of choice of Higher Education’, British journal of Sociology of Education, 23: 51–72.
4.
BourdieuP., (1990), The Logic of Practice, Stanford: Stanford California Press.
5.
BourdieuP. and PasseronJ-C., (1977), Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, London: Sage.
6.
BourdieuP. and WacquantL., (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
7.
BrannenJ., (1992), ‘Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: an overview’ in BrannenJ. (ed.), Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research, Aldershot: Avebury: 3–38.
8.
BynnerJ.DoltonP.FeinsteinL.MakepeaceG.MalmbergL. and WoodsL., (2003), Revisiting the Benefits of Higher Education, London: HEFCE.
9.
CallenderC. and KempM., (2000), ‘Changing student finances: income, expenditure and the take-up of student loans among full and part-time higher education students in 1998/99’, DfEE Research Brief no 213, London: DfEE.
10.
CallenderC.WilkinsonD., (2003), 2002/03 Student Income and Expenditure Survey: Students' Income, Expenditure, and Debt in 2002/03 and changes since 1998/99, Department for Education and Skills, 18 November, 2003.
11.
ChattertonP., (1999), ‘University students and city centres: the formation of exclusive geographies’Geoforum, 30: 117–133.
12.
ChattertonP. and HollandsR., (2003), Urban Nightscapes: Youth Cultures, Pleasure Spaces and Corporate Power, London: Routledge.
13.
CottellC., (2001), ‘Poor students opt to stay put’, The Observer, 30/9/2001.
14.
CrossleyN., (2001), ‘The phenomenological habitus and its construction’, Theory and Society, 30: 81–120.
15.
FuchsC., (2003), ‘Some implications of Pierre Bourdieu's works for a theory of social self-organisation’, European Journal of Social Theory, 6: 387–408.
16.
GiddensA., (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Buckingham: Open University Press.
17.
HaytonA. and PaczuskaA., (2002), Access, Participation and Higher Education, London: Kogan Page.
18.
HumphreyR. and McCarthyP., (1997), ‘High debt and poor housing: a taxing life for contemporary students’Youth and Policy, 56: 55–64.
19.
JenkinsR., (2002), Pierre Bourdieu, London: Routledge.
20.
KenyonE., (1997), “‘Studenthood” in the 1990s: Is there life beyond the lecture theatre?’Youth and Policy, 56: 29–40.
21.
KenyonE., (1999), ‘A home from home: students’ transitional experience of home’ in ChapmanT. and HockeyJ. (eds), Ideal Homes? Social Change and Domestic Life, London: Routledge.
22.
LawlerS., (1999), “‘Getting out and getting away”: women's narratives of class mobility’, Feminist Review, 63: 3–24.
23.
LeathwoodC. and O'ConnellP., (2003), “‘It's a struggle”: the construction of the “new student” in higher education’Journal of Education Policy, 18: 597–615.
24.
MeadG., (1934), Mind, Self and Society, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
25.
Merleau-PontyM., (1962), The Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge.
26.
NashR., (2003), ‘Social explanation and socialization: on Bourdieu and the structure, disposition, practice scheme’, The Sociological Review, 51: 43–62.
27.
PatiniotisJ. and HoldsworthC., (2005), “‘Seize that chance!”: Leaving home and Transitions to Higher Education’, Journal of Youth Studies8: 81–95.
ReayD., (2004), “‘It's all becoming a habitus”: beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research’British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25: 434–444.
30.
ReayD., (2001), ‘Finding or losing yourself?: working-class relationships to education’, Journal of Education Policy, 16: 333–346.
31.
ReayD.DavidM. and BallS., (2001), ‘Making a difference?: Institutional habituses and higher education choice’Sociological Research Online, 5, 4, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/4/reay.html.
32.
SavageM.BarlowJ.DickensP. and FieldingT., (1992), Property, Bureaucracy and Culture: Middle Class Formation in Contemporary Britain, London: Routledge.
33.
SayerA., (2002), What are you worth?: Why class is an embarrassing subject, Sociological Research Online, 7no3.
34.
SkeggsB., (1997), Formations of Class and Gender, London: Sage.
35.
SkeltonT., (2002), ‘Research on youth transitions: some critical interventions’ in CieslikM. and PollockG. (eds), Young People in Risk Society, Aldershot: Ashgate, 100–116.
36.
SummerfieldC. and BabbP., (2004), Social Trends (London: TSO).
37.
SweetmanP., (2003), ‘Twenty-first century dis-ease? Habitual reflexivity or the reflexive habitus’, The Sociological Review, 51: 528–549.
