This essay considers how we might come to understand social constructionism sociologically. It examines a number of related approaches to gender and sexuality that speak to sociological concerns and might be termed social constructionist: historicism, symbolic interactionism, ethnomethodology and materialist feminism. By recognising that social constructionism is multifarious rather than unified, we find that each social constructionist approach offers particular strengths for analysing the complexities of gender and sexuality. Through closely analysing these approaches and some of the criticisms of them we can reassert sociology's specific contribution, and embrace social constructionist analyses which address the multilayered characteristics of the social in general and gender and sexuality in particular.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdkinsL., (1995), Gendered Work: Sexuality, Family and the Labour Market, Buckingham: Open University Press.
2.
ArcherB., (2002), The End of Gay (and the Death of Heterosexuality), London: Fusion.
3.
AustinJ., (1962), How to do Things with Words.Oxford: Clarendon.
4.
BarrettM. and PhillipsA., (1992), ‘Introduction’, in Barrett, M. and Phillips. A., Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
5.
BechH., (2003), ‘The disappearance of the modern homosexual’, in WeeksJ.HollandJ. and WaitesM. (eds), Sexualities and Society: A Reader, Cambridge: Polity.
6.
BeckerH., (1960), ‘Notes on the concept of commitment’, American Journal of Sociology, 66 (1): 32–40.
BlumsteinP., (2001 [1991]), ‘The production of selves in personal relationships’, in BranamanA. (ed.), Self and Society, Oxford: Blackwell.
12.
BranamanA., (2001a), ‘Introduction to Part I’, in BranamanA. (ed.), Self and Society, Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
BranamanA., (2001b), ‘Introduction to Part III’, in BranamanA. (ed.), Self and Society, Oxford: Blackwell.
14.
BrickellC., (2003), ‘Performativity or performance?: clarifications in the sociology of gender’, New Zealand Sociology, 18 (2): 158–178.
15.
BrickellC., (2005a), ‘Masculinities, performativity and subversion: a sociological reappraisal’, Men and Masculinities, vol. 8 (1):24–43.
16.
BrickellC., (2005b), ‘Sex instruction and the construction of homosexuality in New Zealand, 1920–1965’, Sex Education, vol. 5 (2):123–140.
17.
BrickellC. and TaylorB., (2004), ‘What it means to be a gay man’, in AliceL. and StarL. (eds), Queer in Aotearoa/New Zealand.Palmerston North, N.Z.: Dunmore.
18.
BristowJ., (1997), Sexuality, London: Routledge.
19.
BrownW., (2003), ‘Gender in counterpoint’, Feminist Theory, 4 (3): 365–368.
20.
BurrV., (1995), An Introduction to Social Constructionism, London: Routledge.
21.
ButlerJ., (1990), Gender Trouble, New York: Routledge.
22.
CameronJ., (1996/7), ‘Throwing a dishcloth into the works: troubling theories of domestic labour’, Rethinking Marxism, 9 (2): 24–44.
23.
CampbellH., (2000), ‘The glass phallus: pub(lic) masculinity and drinking in rural New Zealand’, Rural Sociology, 65 (4): 562–581.
24.
CarlsonC., (ed.) (1990), Perspectives on the Family: History, Class and Feminism, Belmont: Wadsworth.
25.
ChambersR., (2002), ‘Strategic constructivism?’, in BarberS. and ClarkD. (eds), Regarding Sedgwick: Essays on Queer Culture and Critical Theory, New York: Routledge.
26.
ChaunceyG., (1994), Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Makings of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940, New York: Basic.
27.
CoatesJ., (2000), ‘“So I thought bollocks to that!”: men, stories and masculinities’, in HolmesJ. (ed.), Gendered Speech in Social Context: Perspectives from Town and Gown, Wellington: Victoria University Press.
28.
CollinsP.H., (1995), ‘Symposium on West and Fenstermaker's “Doing difference” ’, Gender and Society, 9 (4): 491–494.
29.
CollinsR. and MakowskyM., (1984), The Discovery of Society, New York: Random House.
30.
CraibI., (1984), Modern Social Theory, Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
D'EmilioJ., (1983), ‘Capitalism and gay identity’, in SnitowA.StansellC. and ThompsonS. (eds), Desire: The Politics of Sexuality, London: Virago.
33.
D'EmilioJ., (2002), The World Turned: Essays on Gay History, Politics, and Culture, Durham: Duke University Press.
34.
D'EmilioJ. and FreedmanE., (1988), Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America, New York: Harper and Row.
35.
DelphyC., (1984), Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Women's Oppression, London: Hutchison.
36.
DelphyC., (1993), ‘Rethinking sex and gender’, Women's Studies International Forum, 16 (1): 1–9.
37.
DelphyC. and LeonardD., (1992), Familiar Exploitation: A New Analysis of Marriage in Contemporary Western Societies, Cambridge: Polity.
38.
DenzinN., (1992), Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies: The Politics of Interpretation, Oxford: Blackwell.
39.
DregerA., (1998), Hermaphrodites and the Medical Invention of Sex, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
40.
DugganL., (2003), ‘The trials of Alice Mitchell: sensationalism, sexology, and the lesbian subject in turn-of-the-century America’, in CorberR. and ValocchiS. (eds), Queer Studies: An Interdisciplinary Reader, Malden: Blackwell.
41.
EpsteinS., (1987), ‘Gay politics, ethnic identity: the limits of social constructionism’, Socialist Review, 93/94 (May–August): 9–54.
42.
EpsteinS., (1994), ‘A queer encounter: sociology and the study of sexuality’, Sociological Theory, 12 (2): 188–202.
43.
FenstermakerS. and WestC., (2002), ‘“Doing difference” revisited: problems, prospects, and the dialogue in feminist theory’, in FenstermakerS. and WestC. (eds), Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power and Institutional Change, New York: Routledge.
44.
FoucaultM., (1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Pantheon.
45.
FoucaultM., (1980), Herculine Barbin: Being the Recently Discovered Memoirs of a Nineteenth-Century French Hermaphrodite, New York: Pantheon.
46.
FoucaultM., (1990 [1976]), The History of Sexuality, Vol 1, London: Penguin.
47.
FryeM., (1983), The Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory, New York: The Crossing Press.
GagnonJ. and SimonW., (1969), ‘Sex education and human development’, in FinkP. and HammettV. (eds), Sexual Function and Dysfunction, Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
50.
GagnonJ. and SimonW., (1973), Sexual Conduct: The Social Sources of Human Sexuality, Chicago: Aldine.
51.
GarfinkelH., (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
52.
GarlickS., (2003), ‘What is a man? Heterosexuality and the technology of masculinity’, Men and Masculinities, 6 (2): 156–172.
53.
GiddensA., (1992), The Transformation of Intimacy, Cambridge: Polity.
54.
GoffmanE., (1959 [1956]), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York: Doubleday.
55.
GoffmanE., (1977), ‘The arrangement between the sexes’, Theory and Society, 4 (3): 301–331.
56.
GreenbergD., (1988), The Construction of Homosexuality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
GuillauminC., (1996 [1978]), ‘The practice of power and belief in nature’, in LeonardD. and AdkinsL. (eds), Sex in Question: French Materialist Feminism, London: Taylor and Francis.
58.
GuttermanD., (2001), ‘Postmodernism and the interrogation of masculinity’, in WhiteheadS. and BarrettF. (eds), The Masculinities Reader, Cambridge: Polity.
59.
HalperinD., (2002), How to do the History of Homosexuality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
HennessyR., (1993), Materialist Feminism and the Politics of Discourse, New York: Routledge.
61.
HennessyR., (2000), Profit and Pleasure, New York: Routledge.
62.
HennessyR. and IngrahamC. (eds), (1997), Materialist Feminism: A Reader in Class, Difference and Women's Lives, New York: Routledge.
63.
HirdM. and GermonJ., (2000), ‘The intersexual body and the medical regulation of gender’, in Backett-MilburnK. and McKieL. (eds), Constructing Gendered Bodies, New York: Palgrave.
64.
HirdM., (2002), ‘Re(pro)ducing sexual difference’, Parallax, 8 (4): 94–107.
65.
HirdM., (2003), ‘A typical gender identity conference? Some disturbing reports from the therapeutic front lines’, Feminism and Psychology, 13 (2): 181–199.
66.
HolmesJ., (2000), Gendered Speech in Social Context: Perspectives from Town and Gown, Wellington: Victoria University Press.
67.
JacksonS., (1993), ‘Even sociologists fall in love: an exploration of the sociology of emotions’, Sociology, 27 (2): 201–220.
68.
JacksonS., (1998a), ‘Feminist social theory’, in JacksonS. and JonesJ. (eds), Contemporary Feminist Theories, New York: New York University Press.
69.
JacksonS., (1998b), ‘Theorising gender and sexuality’, in JacksonS. and JonesJ. (eds), Contemporary Feminist Theories, New York: New York University Press.
70.
JacksonS., (1999), Heterosexuality in Question, London: Sage.
71.
JacksonS., (2000), ‘For a sociological feminism’, in EldridgeJ. (ed.), For Sociology, Durham: Sociologypress.
72.
JacksonS. and ScottS., (2000), ‘Introduction: the gendering of sociology’ in JacksonS. and ScottS. (eds), Gender: A Sociological Reader, London: Routledge.
73.
JacksonS. and ScottS., (2004), ‘The personal is still political: heterosexuality, feminism and monogamy’, Feminism and Psychology, 14 (1): 151–157.
74.
JagoseA., (1996), Queer Theory, Dunedin: Otago University Press.
75.
JamiesonL., (1999), ‘Intimacy transformed: a critical look at the pure relationship’, Sociology, 33 (3): 477–494.
76.
JeffreysS., (1989), ‘Does it matter if they did it?’, in Lesbian History Group (ed.), Not a Passing Phase: Reclaiming Lesbians in History, 1840–1875, London: Women's Press.
77.
JohnsonS. and MeinhofU., (eds), (1997), Language and Masculinity, Oxford: Blackwell.
78.
KatzJ., (2001), Love Stories: Sex Between Men Before Homosexuality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79.
KauthM., (2000), True Nature: A Theory of Sexual Attraction, New York: Kluwer.
80.
KesslerS. and McKennaW., (1978), Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81.
KeysD., (2002), ‘Instrumental sexual scripting: an examination of gender-role fluidity in the correctional institution’, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18 (3): 258–278.
82.
KirbyV., (2001), ‘Theory incorporated’, in DemosV. and SegalM. (eds), An International Feminist Challenge to Theory, Oxford: Elsevier.
83.
KitzingerC., (1987), The Social Construction of Lesbianism, London: Sage.
84.
Krafft-EbingR., (1932 [1886]), Psychopathia Sexualis12th ed., New York: Physicians and Surgeons Book Co.
85.
LanerM. and VentroneN., (2000), ‘Dating scripts revisited’, Journal of Family Issues, 21 (4): 488–500.
86.
LangfordW., (1999), Revolutions of the Heart: Gender, Power and the Delusions of Love, London: Routledge.
87.
LaqueurT., (1990), Making Sex: Body and Gender From the Greeks to Freud, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
88.
LaurieA., (1987), ‘Lesbian worlds’, in CoxS. (ed.), Public and Private Worlds: Women in Contemporary New Zealand, Wellington: Allen and Unwin.
89.
LemkeJ., (1995), Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics, London: Taylor and Francis.
90.
LeonardD. and AdkinsL., (1996), ‘Reconstructing French feminism: commodification, materialism and sex’, in LeonardD. and AdkinsL. (eds), Sex in Question: French Materialist Feminism, London: Taylor and Francis.
91.
LorberJ., (1994), Paradoxes of Gender, New Haven: Yale University Press.
92.
LundgrenE., (2000), ‘Ahead of their time, children of their time, in and out of step 20 years later’, Feminism and Psychology, 10 (1): 55–61.
93.
McIlvennyP., (2002), ‘Critical reflections on performativity and the “un/doing” of gender and sexuality in talk’, in McIlvennyP. (ed.), Talking Gender and Sexuality.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
94.
McIntoshM., (1998 [1968]), ‘The homosexual role’, in NardiP. and SchneiderB. (eds), Social Perspectives in Lesbian and Gay Studies, London: Routledge.
95.
McKennaW. and KesslerS., (2000), ‘Retrospective response’, Feminism and Psychology, 10 (1): 66–72.
96.
MacKinnonC., (1989), To ward a Feminist Theory of the State, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
97.
McLarenA., (1999), Twentieth-century Sexuality: A History, Oxford: Blackwell.
98.
MurrayS., (2002), ‘The comparative sociology of homosexualities’, in RichardsonD. and SeidmanS. (eds), Handbook of Lesbian and Gay Studies, London: Sage: 83–96.
99.
MutchlerM., (2000), ‘Young gay men's stories in the States: scripts, sex, and safety in the time of AIDS’, Sexualities3 (1): 31–54.
100.
NicholsonL. and SeidmanS., (1995), ‘Introduction’, in NicholsonL. and SeidmanS. (eds), Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101.
OramA. and TurnbullA., (2001), The Lesbian History Sourcebook, London: Routledge.
102.
PhillipsK. and ReayB., (2002), ‘Introduction’, in PhillipsK. and ReayB. (eds), Sexualities in History: A Reader, New York: Routledge.
103.
PlummerK., (1995), Telling Sexual Stories, London: Routledge.
104.
PlummerK., (1998), ‘Afterword’, in NardiP. and SchneiderB. (eds), Social Perspectives in Lesbian and Gay Studies, London: Routledge: 605–614.
105.
PlummerK., (2002 [1982]), ‘Symbolic interactionism and sexual conduct: an emergent perspective’, in WilliamsC. and SteinA. (eds), Gender and Sexuality, Malden: Blackwell.
106.
PlumridgeE.FitzgeraldL. and AbelG., (2002), ‘Performing coolness: smoking refusal and adolescent identities’, Health Education Research, 17 (2): 167–179.
107.
RahmanM., (2000), Sexuality and Democracy: Identities and Strategies in Lesbian and Gay Politics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
108.
RahmanM. and WitzA., (2003), ‘What really matters? The elusive quality of the material in feminist thought’, Feminist Theory, 4 (3): 243–262.
RichardsonD., (ed.) (1996), Theorising Heterosexuality: Telling it Straight, Buckingham: Open University Press.
111.
RileyD., (1988), Am I That Name? Feminism and the Category of ‘Women’ in History, Houndmills: MacMillan.
112.
RobbG., (2003), Strangers: Homosexual Love in the Nineteenth Century, New York: Norton.
113.
RoseneilS., (2002), ‘The heterosexual/homosexual binary: past, present and future’, in RichardsonD. and SeidmanS. (eds), Handbook of Lesbian and Gay Studies, London: Sage: 27–44.
114.
SedgwickE., (1985), Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire, New York: Columbia University Press.
115.
SedgwickE., (1994), ‘How to bring your kids up gay’, in WarnerM. (ed.) Fear of a Queer Planet.Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press: 69–81.
116.
SeidmanS., (1991), Romantic Longings: Love in America, 1830–1980, New York: Routledge.
117.
SeidmanS., (1996), ‘Introduction’, in SeidmanS. (ed.) Queer Theory/Sociology, Oxford: Blackwell.
118.
SeidmanS., (1997), Difference Troubles: Queering Social Theory and Sexual Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SimonW. and GagnonJ., (1987), ‘A sexual scripts approach’, in GeerJ. and O'DonohueW. (eds), Theories of Human Sexuality, New York: Plenum.
121.
SmithD., (1990), Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling, London: Routledge.
122.
SmithD., (1999), Writing the Social: Critique, Theory and Investigations, Toronto: Toronto University Press.
123.
SmithD., (2002), ‘Foreword’, in FenstermakerS. and WestC. (eds), Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power and Institutional Change, New York: Routledge.
124.
SteinE., (ed.) (1992), Forms of Desire: Sexual Orientation and the Social Constructionist Controversy, Routledge: New York.
125.
StokoeE. and SmithsonJ., (2001), ‘Making gender relevant: conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction’, Discourse and Society, 12 (2): 217–244.
ThompsonJ., (1990), Ideology and Modern Culture, Cambridge: Polity.
128.
ThorneB., (1995), ‘Symposium on West and Fenstermaker's “Doing difference” ’, Gender and Society9 (4): 497–499.
129.
TurnerR., (1976), ‘The real self: from institution to impulse’, American Journal of Sociology, 81 (5): 989–1016.
130.
UssherJ., (2000), ‘Women's madness: a material-discursive-intrapsychic approach’, in FeeD. (ed.), Pathology and the Postmodern: Mental Illness as Discourse and Experience, London: Sage.
VanceC., (1998 [1989]), ‘Social construction theory: problems in the history of sexuality’, in NardiP. and SchneiderB. (eds), Social Perspectives in Lesbian and Gay Studies, London: Routledge.
133.
WalbyS., (1986), Patriarchy at Work, Cambridge: Polity.
WalbyS., (1992), ‘Post-post-modernism? Theorizing social complexity’, in BarrettM. and PhillipsA. (eds), Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
WallaceR. and WolfA., (1999), Contemporary Social Theory: Expanding the Classical Tradition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
138.
WarnerM., (1996), ‘Introduction’, in WarnerM. (ed.), Fear of a Queer Planet.Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
139.
WaughP., (1998), ‘Postmodernism and feminism’, in JacksonS. and JonesJ. (eds), Contemporary Feminist Theories, New York: New York University Press.
140.
WeatherallA., (2002), Gender, Language and Discourse, Hove: Routledge.
141.
WeberL., (1995), ‘Symposium on West and Fenstermaker's “Doing difference” ’, Gender and Society, 9 (4): 499–502.
142.
WeedonC., (1999), Feminism, Theory and the Politics of Difference, Oxford: Blackwell.
143.
WeeksJ., (1986), Sexuality, London: Routledge.
144.
WeeksJ., (1999), Making Sexual History, Cambridge: Polity.
145.
WeinrichJ., (1992), ‘Reality or social construction?’, in SteinE. (ed.), Forms of Desire: Sexual Orientation and the Social Constructionist Controversy, Routledge: New York.
146.
WestD. and ZimmermanC., (1991), ‘Doing gender’, in LorberJ. and FarrellS. (eds), The Social Construction of Gender, California: Sage.
147.
WhittierD. and SimonW., (2001), ‘The fuzzy matrix of ‘my type’ in intrapsychic sexual scripting’, Sexualities, 4 (2): 139–165.
148.
WilliamsS., (1999), ‘Is anybody there? critical realism, chronic illness and the disability debates’, Sociology of Health and Illness21 (6): 797–819.
149.
WittigM., (1992), The Straight Mind and Other Essays, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
150.
YeatmanA., (1993), ‘Voice and representation in the politics of difference’, in GunewS. and YeatmanA. (eds), Feminism and the Politics of Difference, St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
151.
ZeelandS., (1995), Sailors and Sexual Identity: Crossing the Line Between ‘Straight’ and ‘Gay’ in the U.S. Navy, New York: Harrington Park.
