BergsonH. (1911) Creative Evolution, trans. MitchellA., New York: Henry Holt & Co.
2.
BloorD. (1976) Knowledge and Social Imagery.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BloorD. (1999) ‘Anti Latour’Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 30(1): 81–112.
4.
BrownB. (2001) ‘Representing time: The humble timesheet as a representation and some details of its completion and use’Ethnographic Studies (6), online at: www.equator.ac.uk/PublicationStore/representingtime.pdf (accessed 24/2/05).
5.
CollinsH. and YearleyS. (1992) ‘Epistemological chicken’ in PickeringA. (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
CrawfordT. (1993) ‘An interview with Bruno Latour’, Configurations, 1(2): 247–268.
7.
DoolinB. (2003) ‘Narratives of change: Discourse, technology and organization’Organization, 10(4): 751–770.
8.
EllamM. (1999) ‘Living dangerously with Bruno Latour in a hybrid world’Theory, Culture & Society, 6(4): 1–24.
9.
HughesT. P. (1983) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930.Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
10.
JonesC. and BöhmS. (2002) ‘Hors d'oeuvre’ephemera: critical dialogues on organization, 2(4): 277–280.
11.
LatourB. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts.London: Sage.
12.
LatourB. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
LatourB. (1988) ‘How to write The Prince for machines as well as for machinations’ in BrianE. (ed.) Technology and Social Change.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
14.
LatourB. (1992) We have Never Been Modern.London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
LatourB. (1999a) Pandora's Hope: An Essay on the Reality of Science Studies.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
LatourB. (1999b) ‘On recalling ANT’ in LawJ. and HassardJ. (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After.Oxford: Blackwell.
18.
LatourB. (2002) ‘Gabriel Tarde and the end of the social’ in JoyceP. (ed.) The Social and Its Problems.London: Routledge.
19.
LatourB. (2004) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
LaurierE. and PhiloC. (1999) ‘X-morphising: A review essay of Bruno Latour's Aramis or the Love of Technology’Environment and Planning A, 31: 1043–1071.
21.
LawJ. (1994) Organizing Modernity: Social Order and Social Theory.Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
LawJ. and HassardJ. (eds.) (1999) Actor Network Theory and After.Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
LeeN. and HassardJ. (1999) ‘Organization unbound: Actor-Network Theory, research strategy and institutional flexibility’, Organization, 6(3): 391–404.
24.
Leroi-GourhanA. (1993) Gesture and Speech, trans. BergerA. B.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
MarxK. (1976) Capital (vol 1), trans. FowkesB.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
26.
McLeanC. and HassardJ. (2004) ‘Symmetrical absence/symmetrical absurdity: Critical notes on the production of Actor Network accounts’Journal of Management Studies, 14(3): 493–519.
27.
MumfordL. (1967) The Myth of the Machine (1): Technics and Human Development.New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
28.
MunroR. (1999) ‘Power and discretion: Membership work in the time of technology’Organization, 6(3): 429–450.
29.
ReedM. (2003) ‘The agency/structure dilemma in organization theory: Open doors and brick walls’ in TsoukasH. and KnudsenC. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
SerresM. (1982) The Parasite, trans. SchehrL. R.Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
31.
SerresM. (2002) The Birth of Physics, trans. WebbJ.Manchester: Clinamen.
32.
SokalA. and BricmontJ. (1998) Intellectual Impostures.London: Profile Books.
33.
StieglerB. (1998) Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus, trans. BeardsworthR. and CollinsG.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
WinnerL. (1993) ‘Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology’Science as Culture, 16: 427–452.
