ButlerJ. (1997) Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge.
9.
ButlerJ. (1999) “Performativity's Social Magic” in ShustermanR. (ed.) Bourdieu: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
CalhounC. (1995) “Habitus, Field and Capital: The Question of Historical Specificity” in CalhounC.LiPumaE. and PostoneM. (eds) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity.
11.
CockburnC. (1983) Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change. London: Pluto Press.
12.
CrossleyN. (2000) The Social Body. London: Sage.
13.
CrossleyN. (2001) “Embodiment and Social Structure: A Response to Howson and Inglis”Sociological Review49(3): 318–26.
14.
DreyfusH. and RabinowP. (1995) “Can There Be a Science of Existential Structure and Social Meaning?” in CalhounC.LiPumaE. and PostoneM. (eds) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
FowlerB. (1997) Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Theory: Critical Investigations. London: Sage.
16.
HaylesN. K. (1999) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, Ill.: The University of Chicago Press.
17.
HardingS. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
18.
HowsonA. and InglisD. (2001) “The Body in Sociology: Tensions Inside and Outside Sociological Thought”The Sociological Review49(3): 297–317.
19.
KraisB. (1995) “Gender and Symbolic Violence: Female Oppression in the Light of Pierre Bourdieu's Theory of Social Practice” in CalhounC.LiPumaE. and PostoneM. (eds) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
LovellT. (2000) “Thinking Feminism With and Against Bourdieu”Feminist Theory1(1): 11–32.
21.
LovellT. (2003) “Resisting with Authority: Historical Specificity, Agency and the Performative Self”Theory, Culture and Society20(1): 1–17.
22.
MargolisJ. (1999) “Pierre Bourdieu: Habitus and the Logic of Practice” in ShustermanR. (ed.) Bourdieu: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
McNayL. (1999) “Gender, Habitus and the Field: Pierre Bourdieu and the Limits of Reflexivity”Theory, Culture and Society16(1): 95–117.
24.
McNayL. (2000) Gender and Agency. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
MoiT. (1999) What is a Woman? And Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
MottierV. (2002) “Masculine Domination: Gender and Power in Bourdieu's Writings”Feminist Theory3(3): 345–359.
27.
PhillipsA. and TaylorB. (1986) “Sex and Skill” in Feminist Review (ed.) Waged Work: A Reader. London: Virago.
28.
PringleR. (1998) Sex and Medicine: Gender, Power and Authority in the Medical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
ProbynE. (1990) “Travels in the Postmodern: Making Sense of the Local” in FraserN. and NicholsonL. (eds) Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge.
30.
ReayD. (1998) Class Work: Mothers' Involvement in Children's Schooling. London: University College Press.
31.
RobbinsD. (2002) “Sociology and Philosophy in the work of Pierre Bourdieu, 1965–1975”Journal of Classical Sociology2(3): 299–328.
32.
RoseH. (1994) Love, Power and Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
33.
SkeggsB. (1997) Formations of Class and Gender. London: Sage.
34.
WalbyS. (1986) Patriarchy at Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
WitzA. (1992) Professions and Patriarchy. London: Routledge.
36.
WitzA. (2000) “Whose Body Matters?: Feminist Sociology and the Corporeal Turn in Sociology and Feminism”Body & Society6(2): 1–24.