The current interest in difference has arisen in part because of its importance in recent recognition claims, and in part because of a belief that as a concept it can illuminate social diversity. Debates here have stressed the importance of the symbolic in the construction of social relations and social diversity, and have highlighted the relational underpinnings of diversity. In this paper we seek to take forward aspects of such an analysis by examining some issues in the shaping of difference and inequalities in the domains of gender, class and ‘race’. It is our argument that we can gain insights in these domains by better describing and theorising the mutuality of value and material social relations. The paper argues that issues of identity and difference need to be more firmly located within relational accounts of social practice, and in the nature of claims (to recognition and resources) which emerge out of different social locations. By exploring issues of difference in debates on class, gender and ‘race’, we argue that relational accounts must be placed within a perspective that also emphasises the content and patterned nature of (highly differentiated) social relations.
AmitV. and RapportN., (2002), The Trouble With Community, London: Pluto Press.
3.
AnthiasF., (1998), ‘Rethinking social divisions: some notes towards a theoretical framework’, The Sociological Review, 46 (3): 505–535.
4.
AnthiasF., (2001), ‘The material and the symbolic in theorizing social stratification: issues of gender, ethnicity and class’, British Journal of Sociology, 52 (3): 367–390.
5.
AriesP., (1980), ‘Two successive motivations for the declining birth rate in the West’, Population and Development Review, 6: 645–650.
6.
BarthF., (ed.), (1969), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries, Oslo: University Press.
7.
BarthF., (1994), ‘Enduring and emerging issues in the analysis of ethnicity’ in VermeulenH. and GroversC. (eds), The Anthropology of Ethnicity: Beyond Ethnic Groups and Boundaries, The Hague: Het Spinhuis.
8.
BeckU., (1992), Risk Society, London: Sage.
9.
BeckU. and Beck-GernsheimE., (2002), Individualization, London: Sage.
10.
BotteroW. and PrandyK., (2003), ‘Social interaction distance and stratification’, British Journal of Sociology, 54 (2): 177–197.
11.
BourdieuP., (1984), [1979], Distinction, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
12.
BrahA., (1992), Difference, diversity and differentiation, in DonaldJ. and RattansiA. (eds), ‘Race’, Culture and Difference, London: Sage.
13.
BrubakerR., (2002), ‘Ethnicity without groups’, European Journal of Sociology, XLIII(2): 163–189.
14.
BurkittI., (1998), Sexuality and gender identity: from a discursive to a relational analysis, Sociological Review, 46, 3: 483–504.
15.
CaldwellJ., (1980), ‘Mass education as a determinant of the timing of fertility decline’, Population and Development Review, 6 (2): 225–55.
16.
CampbellA., (1999), Childfree and Sterilised. Women's Decisions and Medical Responses, London: Cassell.
17.
CannadineD., (1998), Class in Britain, Yale University Press: London.
18.
ClarkeJ., (2002), ‘Social Policy and the cultural turn’, paper presented to ESPRN Conference on Social Values and Social Policies, Tilberg, 29–21 August.
19.
CreightonC. (1999) ‘The rise and decline of the “male breadwinner family” in Britain’, Cambridge Journal of Economics23 (5): 519–41.
20.
CromptonR., (ed.), (1999), Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment.
21.
CromptonR., (2002), Employment, flexible working and the family’, British Journal of Sociology, 53 (4): 537–58.
22.
CrookS.PakulskiJ. and WatersM., (1992), Postmodernization, London: Sage.
23.
DevineF. and SavageM., (2000), ‘Conclusion: Renewing class analysis’, in CromptonR.DevineF.SavageM. and ScottJ. (eds), Renewing Class Analysis, Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
DuncanS. and EdwardsR., (1999), Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities, Basingstoke: Macmillan
25.
DyerR., (1997), White, London: Routledge.
26.
DyerR., (2000), ‘The matter of whiteness’ in BackL. and SolomosJ. (eds), Theories of Race and Racism, London: Routledge.
27.
EgertonM. and SavageM., (2000), Age stratification and class formation: a longitudinal study of the social mobility of young men and women, 1971–1991, Work, Employment and Society, 14, 1: 23–49
28.
EvansM.D.R.KelleyJ. and KolosiT., (1992), ‘Images of class: public perceptions in Hungary and Australia’, American Sociological Review, 57: 461–482.
29.
FrankenbergR., (2000), ‘White women, race matters: the social construction of whiteness’ in BackL. and SolomosJ. (eds) Theories of Race and Racism, London: Routledge.
30.
FraserN., (1995), ‘From redistribution to recognition: dilemmas of justice in a post-socialist age’New Left Review, 212: 68–93.
31.
GillisJ.R.TillyL.A. and LevineD., (eds), (1992), The European Experience of Declining Fertility 1850–1970, Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
GittinsD., (1982), Fair sex. Family Size and Structure 1900–39, London: Hutchinson.
33.
HallS., (2000), ‘Conclusion: the multicultural question’, in HesseB. (ed.), Un/settled Multiculturalisms, London: Zed.
34.
HandwerkerW.P., (1986), ‘Culture and Reproduction: Exploring Micro/Macro linkages’, in HandwerkerW. P. (ed.), Culture and Reproduction, Boulder: Westview Press.
35.
HonnethA., (1996), The Struggle for Recognition, Oxford: Polity Press.
36.
IrwinS., (1995), Rights of Passage. Social Change and the Transition from Youth to Adulthood, London: UCL Press.
37.
IrwinS., (2000a), ‘Reproductive regimes: changing relations of interdependence and fertility change’, Sociological Research Online5, 1http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/1/irwin.html.
38.
IrwinS., (2000b), ‘Repositioning disability and the life course: a social claiming perspective’, in PriestleyM. (ed.), Disability and the Life Course. Global Perspectives, Cambridge: CUP.
39.
IrwinS., (2003), ‘Interdependencies, values and the reshaping of difference: gender and generation at the birth of twentieth century modernity’, British Journal of Sociology, 54 (4): 565–584.
40.
IrwinS. and BotteroW., (2000), ‘Market returns? Gender and theories of change in employment relations’, British Journal of Sociology, 51 (2): 261–280.
41.
JenkinsR., (1996), Social Identity, London: Routledge.
42.
JensonJ., (1986), ‘Gender and reproduction: Or, babies and the state’, Studies in Political Economy20: 9–46.
43.
KalmijnM., (1994), ‘Assortative mating by cultural and economic occupational status’, American Journal of Sociology100 (2): 422–452.
44.
KalmijnM., (1998), ‘Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends’, Annual Review of Sociology24: 395–421.
45.
KelleyJ. and EvansM.D.R., (1995), ‘Class and class conflict in six western nations’, American Sociological Review, 60: 157–178.
46.
LesthaegheR. and SurkynJ., (1988), ‘Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change’, Population and Development Review, 4 (1): 1–45.
LewisJ., (ed.), (1986), Labour and love. Women's Experience of Home and Family 1850–1940, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
49.
McRaeS., (1999), Changing Britain. Families and Households in the 1990s, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
MaynardM., (1994), ‘Race’, gender and the concept of difference in feminist thought, in AfsharH. and MaynardM. (eds), The dynamics of ‘race’, and gender, London: Taylor and Francis.
51.
ModoodT.BeishonS. and VirdeeS., (1994), Changing Ethnic Identities, London: PSI.
52.
MorellC.M., (1994), Unwomanly Conduct. The Challenges of Intentional Childlessness, London: Routledge.
53.
PakulsiJ. and WatersM., (1995), The Death of Class, London: Sage.
54.
PeattieL. and ReinM., (1983), Women's Claims, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
PedersenS., (1993), Family, Dependence and the Origins of the Welfare State. Britain and France 1914–1945, Cambridge: CUP.
56.
PhillipsA., (1999), Which Equalities Matter?Mass: Polity Press.
57.
PrandyK. and BotteroW., (2000), ‘Social reproduction and mobility in Britain and Ireland in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries’, Sociology34 (2): 265–281.
58.
PrandyK. and JonesF.L., (2001), ‘An international comparative analysis of marriage patterns and social stratification’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy21 (4/5/6): 165–183.
59.
ReayD., (1997), ‘Feminist theory, habitus, and social class: disrupting notions of classlessness’, Women's Studies International Forum, 20 (2): 225–233.
60.
ReayD., (1998), ‘Rethinking social class: qualitative perspectives on class and gender’, Sociology, 32 (2): 259–275.
61.
RobertsE., (1986), ‘Women's strategies 1890–1940’, in LewisJ. (ed.) op cit.
62.
RoseneilS., (1995), ‘The coming of age of feminist sociology – some issues of practice and theory for the next 20 years’, British Journal of Sociology, 46 (2): 191–205.
63.
SavageM., (2000), Class Analysis and Social Transformation, Buckingham: Open University Press.
64.
SeccombeW., (1993), Weathering the Storm, London: Verso.
65.
SilvaE. and SmartC.C., (eds), (1999), The New Family?London: Sage.
66.
SkeggsB., (1997), Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable, London: Sage.
67.
SolomosJ. and BackL., (1996), Racism and Society, Oxford: Macmillan.
68.
SzreterS., (1996), Fertility, Class and Gender in Britain, 1860–1940, Cambridge University Press.
WalbyS., (2001), ‘From community to coalition. The politics of recognition as the handmaiden of the politics of equality in an era of globalization’, Theory, Culture and Society18, 2–3: 113–35.
71.
WallmanS., (1986), ‘Ethnicity and the boundary process in context’ in RexJ. and MasonD. (eds), Theories of Race and Ethnic Relations, Cambridge: CUP.
72.
WilliamsF., (2001), The politics of recognition, Workshop paper presented to CAVA: the ESRC Research Group for the study of care, values and the future of Welfare, University of Leeds.
73.
YoungI.M., (1990), Justice and the Politics of Difference, New Jersey: Princeton Press.
74.
YoungI.M., (1997), ‘Difference as a resource for democratic communication’ in BohmanJ. and RehgW., (eds) Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: MIT Press.
75.
ZelizerV., (1985/1994), Pricing the Priceless Child, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
