There is presently much theoretical discourse claiming that nature is being socially constructed or even abolished. Some authors celebrate this development and others lament it. Still others bracket nature's dynamics out of the analysis. The present paper critically assesses these theories and methodologies concerning relations between social practices and processes of nature. It then develops an alternative argument. The expansion of society into wilderness areas has brought new disturbances of nature into society. Pristine nature has been replaced by socially encompassed primal nature, which retains its capacity for independent dynamics that affect social constructions. Moreover, nature remains embedded in technology and so does its potential to escape control. These hybrids constructed by humans and nonhumans recombine processes and materials of nature. Now that this recombi-nant nature has been integrated into society and new primal dynamics of nature have been internalised, there is increasing reason to incorporate the forces of nature into sociological analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamB., (1995), Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2.
AdamB., (1998), Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards. London: Routledge.
3.
AdamB., (2000), ‘The Media Timescapes of BSE News’, in AllanS.AdamB.CarterC. (eds) Environmental Risks and the Media, pp. 117–129. London: Routledge.
4.
BakerD.AllenJ.KanekalS.ReevesG., (1998), ‘Pager Satellite Failure May Have Been Related to Disturbed Space Environment’. EosVol. 79 October 6: 477.
5.
BeckU., (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
6.
BeckU., (1995), Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
BeckermanW., (1974), In Defense of Economic Growth. London: Jonathan Cape.
8.
BentonT., (1989), ‘Marxism and Natural Limits’. New Left Review, 178: 51–86.
9.
BentonT., (1991), ‘Biology and Social Science’. Sociology, 25: 1–29.
10.
BentonT., (1992), ‘Ecology, Socialism, and the Mastery of Nature: A Reply to Reiner Grund-mann’. New Left Review, 194: 55–74.
BentonT., (1994), ‘Biology and Social Theory in the Environmental Debate’. Pp. 28–50 in RedcliftM.BentonT. (eds), Social Theory and the Global Environment. London: Routledge.
13.
BhaskarR., (1978), A Realist Theory of Science. Harvester Press: Hassocks.
14.
BhaskarR., (1979), The Possibility of Naturalism. Harvester Wheatsheaf: Hemel Hempstead.
CollinsH., (1981), ‘Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism’. Social Studies of Science, 11: 3–10.
23.
CollinsH.PinchT., (1979), ‘The Construction of the Paranormal: Nothing Unscientific is Happening’. Pp. 237–270 in WallisR. (ed.) On the Margins of Science. University of Keele: Sociological Review Monograph no. 27.
24.
DickensP., (1992), Science and Nature. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25.
DickensP., (1996), Reconstructing Nature: Alienation, Emancipation and the Division of Labour. London: Routledge.
26.
DickensP., (2000), Social Darwinism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
27.
DickensP., (2001), ‘Linking the Social and Natural Sciences’. Sociology, 35: 93–110.
28.
DunlapR.CattonW., (1994). ‘Struggling With Human Exemptionalism’. American Sociologist, 25: 5–30.
29.
DunlapR.ScarceR., (1991), ‘The Polls-Poll Trends’. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55: 651–672.
30.
EderK., (1996), The Social Construction of Nature. London: Sage.
31.
EverndenN., (1993), The Social Creation of Nature. New Haven: Yale University Press.
32.
EwaldP., (1994), Evolution of Infectious Disease. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
FrankD.J., (1997), ‘Science, Nature, and the Globalization of the Environment’. Social Forces, 76: 409–437.
34.
GiddensA., (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
GrundmannR., (1991a), ‘The ecological challenge to Marxism’. New Left Review, 187: 103–120.
36.
GrundmannR., (1991b), Marxism and Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MaddoxJ., (1972), The Doomsday Syndrome. London: Macmillan.
49.
McKibbenB., (1990), The End of Nature. New York: Random House.
50.
MerchantC., (1980), The Death of Nature. San Francisco: Harper Collins.
51.
MitchellR.C., (1990), ‘Public Opinion and the Green Lobby’. Pp. 81–99 in VigN.J.KraftM.E. (eds), Environmental Policy in the 1990s. Washington: CQ Press.
