Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This chapter is about a very old question that is thrown up again in discussion related to ANT. Do orders have necessary limits to what can belong to them? It is possible to read ANT as containing or demanding a moral commitment to the inclusion of the disenfranchised. It can often seem to be in the business of giving credit where credit is due, spreading recognition to even the most unexpected quarters. To sustain itself such a morality would depend on the possibility of infinite inclusion. By identifying this picture of ‘belonging-by-assemblage’ and its traditional counterpart ‘belonging-by-banishment’ and by finding both at play within ANT, the paper argues that ANT is an ethical rather than a moral enterprise, bringing the unanswered question of the nature of belonging to bear across domains, rather than approaching each domain with a ‘cookie-cutter’ moral formula. The disturbing ‘unsecuring’ of belonging that ANT involves continues within the philosophical tradition ANT trades on and contributes to in the form of an abiding controversy over the place of the natural world.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Calasso

(1994), The Marriage of Cadmus and Harmony, Vintage: London.

Cooper

Law

(1995), ‘Organisation: Distal and Proximal Views’ in Bachrach

Gagliardi

Mundell

(eds), Research in the Sociology of Organisations: Studies of Organisation in the European Tradition. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Girard

(1977), Violence and the Sacred. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Deleuze

(1988, A), Foucault (trans. Hand

), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Deleuze

(1988, B), Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books.

Derrida

(1995), The Gift of Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Guattari

(1995), Chaosmosis: An Ethico-Aesthetic Paradigm. Sydney: Power Publications.

Hardt

(1993), Gilles Deleuze: An Apprenticeship in Philosophy. London: UCL Press.

Heidegger

(1977), The Question Concerning Technology, trans. Lovitt , New York: W. Harper Torchbooks

10.

Latour

(1992), ‘Where are the missing masses? A sociology of a few mundane artifacts’. In Bijker

W.E.

Law

(eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

11.

Latour

(1993), We Have Never Been Modern, trans. Porter

C. Hemel

Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

12.

Law

(1997), Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience.

13.

Lee

N. M.

(1998a), ‘Two Speeds: How are Stabilities Possible?’ in Chia

(ed.), Organized Worlds: Explorations in Technology and organization with Robert Cooper. London: Routledge.

14.

Lee

N. M.

(1998b), ‘Faith in the Body: Childhood, Subjecthood and Sociological Enquiry’ in Prout

(ed.), Childhood Bodies. London: Macmillan.

15.

Lee

N. M.

Brown

(1994), ‘Otherness and the Actor Network: The Undiscovered Continent’. American Behavioral Scientist. 37. 6. 772–790.

16.

Rotman

(1993), Ad Infinitum: The Ghost in Turing's Machine. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

17.

Series

(1995), The Natural Contract, trans. MacArthur

Paulson

, The University of Michigan Press.

18.

Serres

Latour

(1995), Conversations of Science, Culture and Time, trans. Lapidus

The University of Michigan Press.

19.

Strathern

(1996), ‘Cutting the Network’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2, 517–535.

Who Pays? Can We Pay Them Back?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References