The paper explores one after the other the four difficulties of actor-network theory, that is the words ‘actor’, ‘network’ and ‘theory’—without forgetting the hyphen. It tries to refocus the originality of what is more a method to deploy the actor's own world building activities than an alternative social theory. Finally, it sketches some of its remaining potential.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaumanZ. (1992), Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge.
2.
BergM.MolA. (1998) (eds), Differences in Medicine: Unravelling Practices, Techniques and Bodies, Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
3.
BloorD. (1998), ‘Anti-Latour.’Studies in History and Philosophy of Science.
4.
CallonM.LatourB. (1981), ‘Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Do Actors Macrostructure Reality’. Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro Sociologies. this volumeKnorrK.CicourelA., London: Routledge, 277–303.
5.
ChateauraynaudF. (1991), ‘Forces et faiblesses de la nouvelle anthropologie des sciences.’Critique (529–530): 458–478.
6.
CollinsH.YearleyS. (1992), ‘Epistemological Chicken’. Science as Practice and Culture. A. Pickering. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 301–326.
7.
CussinsA. (1992), ‘Content, Embodiment and Objectivity: The Theory of Cognitive Trails.’Mind101(404): 651–688.
8.
CussinsC. (1996), ‘Ontological Choreography: Agency for Women Patients in an Infertility Clinic.’ Pages 166–201 in BergM.MolA., Differences in Medicine, Durham, N. Carolina: Duke University Press.
9.
CzarniarwskaB. (1997), Narrating the Organization, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10.
DescolaP.PalssonG. (eds) (1996), Nature and Society. Anthropological Perspectives. London: Routledge.
11.
LatourB. (1996), ‘On Interobjectivity—with discussion by Marc Berg, Michael Lynch and Yrjo Engelström.’Mind, Culture and Activity3(4): 228–245.
12.
LatourB. (1996), Petite réflexion sur le culte moderne des dieux Faitiches. Paris, Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond.
13.
LatourB. (1997), ‘Socrates' and Callicles' Settlement or the Invention of the Impossible Body Politic.’Configurations Spring(2): 189–240.
14.
LatourB. (1997), ‘The Trouble with Actor Network Theory.’Soziale Welt47: 369–381.
15.
LatourB. (1999), Pandora's Hope. Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
16.
LatourB.HermantE. (1998), Paris ville invisible. Paris, La Découverte-Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond.
17.
LeeN.BrownS. (1994), ‘Otherness and the Actor-Network: The Undiscovered Continent.’American Behavioral Scientist37(6): 772–790.
18.
MolA.LawJ. (1994), ‘Regions, Networks, and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology.’Social Studies of Science24(4): 641–672.
19.
PowerM. (ed.) (1995), Accounting and Science: National Inquiry and Commercial Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
StengersI. (1996), Cosmopolitiques—Tome 1: La guerre des sciences. Paris, La découverte and Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond.
21.
StengersI. (1997), Power and Invention. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
TaylorJ.J. (R), Rethinking the Theory of Organizational Communication: How to Read an Organization. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
