AllenB.T., (1971), ‘Vertical integration and market foreclosure: The case of cement and concrete’. The Journal of Law and Economics, No. 4, pp. 251–274.
2.
BensonB.L.GreenhutM.L.GeorgeN., (1990a), ‘On the Basing-Point System’. The American Economic Review, Vol. 80, No. 4, June, pp. 584–588.
3.
BensonB.L.GreenhutM.L.GeorgeN., (1990b), ‘On the Basing-Point System: Reply’. The American Economic Review, Vol. 80, No. 4, September, pp. 963–967.
4.
ClarkJ.M., (1938), ‘Basing point of methods of price quoting’. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, November, Vol. IV, No. 4, pp. 477–489.
5.
ClarkJ.M., (1940), ‘Toward a Concept of Workable Competition’. The American Economic Review, Vol. XXX, No. 2, June, pp. 241–256.
6.
FetterFrank Albert, (1948), ‘Exit basing point pricing’. The American Economic Review, Vol. 38, December, pp. 815–827.
7.
ClarkJ.M., (1949), ‘The Law and Economics of Basing Points: Appraisal and Proposals’. The American Economic Review, Vol. XXXIX, No. 2, pp. 430–447.
8.
EEC, (1994), Commission Decision of 30 November 1993 Relating to a Proceeding under Article 85 of the EC Treatise (Cases IV/33.126 and 33.322–Cement). Official Journal of the European Communities, L343, Vol. 37, 30 December, pp. 343/1–343/158.
9.
HuhtaR.S., (1990a), ‘Another look at vertical integration’. Rock Products, February, pp. 15–16.
10.
HuhtaR.S., (1990b), ‘Another look at vertical integration’. Rock Products, March, pp. 13–14.
11.
JohnsonR.N.ParkmanA.M., (1983), ‘Spatial monopoly, Non-zero Profits and Entry Deterrence: The Case of Cement’. Review of Economics and Statistics, August, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 431–439.
12.
JohnsonR.N.ParkmanA.M., (1987a), ‘Spatial competition and vertical integration; Cement and Concrete Revisited: Comment’. The American Economic Review, September, pp. 750–753.
13.
JohnsonR.N.ParkmanA.M., (1987b), ‘The Role of Ideas in Antitrust Policy Toward Vertical Mergers: Evidence from the FTC Cement-Ready Mixed Concrete Cases.’The Antitrust Bulletin, Winter, pp. 841–883.
14.
KamerschenD.R., (1974), ‘Predatory Pricing, vertical integration and market foreclosure: The case of ready-mix concrete in Memphis’. Industrial Organization Review, 1974, Vol. 2, pp. 143–168.
15.
LiebelerW.J., (1968), ‘Toward a consumer's antitrust law: The Federal Trade Commission and vertical mergers in the cement industry’. UCLA Law Review, 1968, Vol. 15, pp. 1153–1202.
16.
LoescherS.M., (1959), Imperfect Collusion in the Cement Industry. Cambridge (MA.): Harvard University Press.
17.
McBrideM.E., (1983), ‘Spatial competition and vertical integration; cement and concrete revisited’. American Economic Review, December, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 1011–1022.
18.
MachlupF., (1949), The Basing Point SystemPhiladelphia: Blakiston.
19.
MeehanJ.W.Jr., (1972), ‘Vertical Foreclosure in the Cement industry: A Comment’. The Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. XV(2). October, pp. 461–471.
20.
MoomawR.L., (1976), ‘Vertical integration, predation and monopolization: The symbiotic relationship between the cement and ready mix concrete industries’. Industrial Organization Review, Vol. 4, pp. 117–119.
21.
Müller-HenenbergH.SchwartzG., (1958), Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkugnen. Kommentar. Köln/Berlin: Carl Heymanns Verlag KG.
22.
HaddockD.D., (1982), ‘Basing-point pricing: Competitive vs. collusive theories’. The American Economic Review, Vol. 72, No. 3, June, pp. 289–306.
23.
HaddockD.D., (1990), ‘On the Basing-Point System: A Comment’. The American Economic Review, Vol. 80, No. 4, September, pp. 957–962.
24.
HoppmannE., (1967), ‘Workable Competition als Wettbewerbspolitisches Konzept’ in Theoretische und institutionnelle Grundlagen der Wirtschaftspolilik, Berlin: Festschrift für Theodor Wessels.
25.
KantzenbachE., (1966), Die Funktionsfähigketi des Wettbewerbs. Göttingen.
26.
PeckM.J.McGowanJ.J., (1967), ‘Vertical Integration in Cement: A Critical Examination of the FTC Staff Report’. The Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. XII, Summer, p. 505 et seq.
27.
PhlipsL., (1993), ‘Parallélisme de compotements et pratiques concertées’. Revue d'économie industrielle, n° 61, 1er trimestre, pp. 25–44.
28.
PhlipsL., (1995), Competition Policy: A Game-theoric Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Portland Cement Association. (1992), US and Canadian Cement Industry: Plant Acquisition and Ownership Report—1974 to Present. PCA: Skokie.
StearnE.Q., (1966), ‘FTC heeds cement industry pleas’. Rock Products, August 1966, pp. 67–120.
32.
US District Court for the District of Arizona (1983), In Re: Cement and concrete antitrust litigation. Appendix D: Plaintiffs joint narrative summary of litigation and statement of central facts and legal issues. MDL docket No. 296, PHX-MLR (MS). September 7.
33.
US Federal Trade Commission, (1932), Report of the Federal Trade Commission on Price Basis Inquiry, the Basing-Point formula and Cement Prices. Washington.
34.
US Federal Trade Commission, (1933), Cement Industry, Letter from the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, Transmitting in Response to Senate Resolution No. 448, Seventy-First Congress, A Report Relative to Competitive Conditions in the Cement Industry. Washington.
35.
US Federal Trade Commission (1966a), Economic Report on Mergers and Vertical Integration in the Cement Industry. Staff Report to the Federal Trade Commission. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, April.
36.
US Federal Trade Commission, (1966b), FTC Public Hearings on Vertical Integration in the Cement Industry. Washington DC: 12 July 1966.
37.
WilkD., (1968), ‘Vertical Integration in Cement Revisited: A Comment on Peck and McGowan’. The Antitrust Bulletin, pp. 619–647.