This paper looks at the work of the Chicago School in the 1920s and 1930s from the standpoint of the debate between positivism and its critics within the discipline of sociology. It is argued that, despite appearances to the contrary, Chicago sociology at this time is based on a rejection of the principles of positivism. It is an attempt to apply the principles of interpretative understanding to the practical problems of empirical research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbercrombieN.HillS.TurnerB.S., (1988), The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
2.
AthensL.H., (1984), ‘Blumer's Method of Naturalistic Inquiry: A Critical Examination’, Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 5: 241–57.
3.
BechtelW., (1988), Philosophy of Science: An Overview for Cognitive Science, Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BentonT., (1977), Philosophical Foundations of the Three Sociologies, London: Routledge.
5.
BernsteinR.J., (1979), The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory, Methuen.
6.
BoltonC.D., (1971), ‘Is Sociology A Behavioural Science?’, in ManisMeltzer, (1971).
BottomoreT.B.NisbetR. (eds), (1978), A History of Sociological Analysis, Heinemann.
9.
BrodbeckM. (ed.), (1971), Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Collier Macmillan.
10.
BrownC.H., (1979), Understanding Society: An Introduction to Sociological Theory, John Murray, London.
11.
BryantC.G.A., (1985), Positivism in Social Theory and Research, Macmillan.
12.
BulmerM., (1983), ‘The Society For Social Research: An Institutional Underpinning to the Chicago School of Sociology in the 1920s’, Urban Life, 11, 4, 421–439.
13.
BulmerM. (1984), The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, Diversity and the Rise of Sociological Research, University of Chicago Press.
14.
BulmerM., (1988), ‘A Comment On: The Relation of Theory and Method: Causal Relatedness, Historical Contingency and Beyond’, Sociological Review, 36, 3, 470–3.
15.
BurgessE., (1967), ‘The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project’, in ParkBurgessMcKenzie, 1967.
16.
CareyJ.T., (1975), Sociology and Public Affairs: The Chicago School. Sage.
17.
CavanR.S., (1983), ‘The Chicago School of Sociology: 1918–1933’, Urban Life, 11, 4, 407–420.
18.
CharlesworthL. (ed.), (1967), Contemporary Political Analysis, Collier Macmillan.
19.
ColomyP.BrownJ.D., (1995), ‘Elaboration, Revision, Polemic and Progress in the Second Chicago School’, in Fine, 1995.
20.
CoserL.A., (1971), Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context, Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch: New York.
21.
DahlR.A., (1969), ‘The Behavioural Approach in Political Science: Epitaph For A Monument to A Successful Protest’, in Eulau, 1969.
22.
DahlR.A., (1971), ‘A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model’, in Pizzorno, 1971.
23.
DouglasJ. (ed.), (1971), Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge, Routledge.
24.
DouglasJ., (1971), ‘Understanding Everyday Life’, in Douglas, 1971.
25.
DoyalL.HarrisR., (1986). Empiricism, Explanation and Rationality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Routledge.
ManisJ.G.MeltzerB.N., (1971), Symbolic Interaction: A Reader in Social Psychology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
68.
MarshD.StokerG., (1995). Theory and Methods in Political Science, Macmillan.
69.
MatzaD., (1969), Becoming Deviant, Prentice Hall.
70.
MayT., (1993), Social Research: Issues, Methods and Practices. Open University Press.
71.
MeadG.H., (1962), Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist. University of Chicago Press.
72.
MeltzerB.N., (1971), ‘Mead's Social Psychology’, in ManisMeltzer, 1971.
73.
MeltzerB.N.PetrasJ.W.ReynoldsL.T., (1975), Symbolic Interactionism: Genesis, Varieties and Criticism. Routledge.
74.
MerriamC., (1959), ‘New Aspects of Politics’, in Eulau, 1959.
75.
MorrisC.W., (1962), ‘George Herbert Mead as a Social Psychologist and Social Philosopher’, in Mead, 1962.
76.
NagelE., (1974), The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Routledge.
77.
NatansonM., (1956), The Social Dynamics of George Herbert Mead. Public Affairs Press, Washington, D.C.
78.
NovackG., (1975), Pragmatism Versus Marxism: An Appraisal of John Dewey's Philosophy, Pathfinder Press.
79.
ParkR.E.BurgessE., (1921), Introduction to the Science of Sociology, University of Chicago Press.
80.
ParkR.E.BurgessE.McKenzieR.D., (1967), The City, University of Chicago Press. First published 1925.
81.
ParkR.E., 1967, ‘The City: Suggestions for the Investigation of Human Behaviour in the Urban Environment’, in ParkBurgessMcKenzie, 1967.
82.
ParkR.E., (1968), ‘The City as a Social Laboratory’, in SmithWhite, 1968.
83.
PawsonR., (1989), A Measure For Measures: A Manifesto For Empirical Sociology, Routledge.
84.
PawsonR., (1989), ‘On being “empirical” without being “empiricist”,’ in Pawson, 1989.
85.
PhillipsD.C., (1988), Philosophy, Science and Social Inquiry: Contemporary Methodological Controversies in Social Science and Related Applied Fields of Research, Pergamon Press.
86.
PizzornoA., (1971), Political Sociology, Penguin Books.
87.
PlattJ., (1983), ‘The Development of the Participant Observation Method in Sociology: Origin, Myth and History’, Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 19: 379–93.
88.
PlattJ., (1985), ‘Weber's Verstehen and the History of Qualitative Research: The Missing Link’, The British Journal of Sociology, 36, 3, 448–66.
89.
PlattJ., (1986), ‘Functionalism and the Survey: The Relation of Theory and Method’, Sociological Review, 34, 3, 501–36.
90.
PlattJ., (1988), ‘A Comment On: The Relation of Theory and Method: Causal Relatedness, Historical Contingency and Beyond’, Sociological Review, 36, 3, 464–9.
91.
PlattJ., (1995), ‘Research Methods and the Second Chicago School’, in Fine, 1995.
92.
PolomaM.M., (1979), Contemporary Sociological Theory, Macmillan, New York.
93.
PolsbyN.W., (1963), Community Power and Political Theory, Yale University Press.
94.
RockP., (1979), The Making of Symbolic Interactionism, Macmillan.
95.
RoseA.M., (1971), Human Behaviour and Social Processes: An Interactionist Approach, Routledge.
96.
RyanA., (1972), The Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Macmillan.
97.
SandersD., (1995), ‘Behavioral Analysis’, in MarshStoker, 1995.
98.
ShroyerT., (1970), ‘Toward a Critical Theory for Advanced Industrial Society’, in Dreitzel, 1970a.
99.
SmelserN.J., (1968), Essays in Sociological Explanation, Prentice Hall, New York.
100.
SmelserN.J., (1968), The Chicago School: A Liberal Critique of Capitalism. Macmillan.
101.
SmithT.V.WhiteL.D. (eds), (1968), Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research, Greenwood Press, New York.
102.
SnodgrassJ., (1983), ‘The Jack-Roller: A Fifty Year Follow Up’, Urban Life, 11, 4, 440–460.
103.
ThomasD., (1979), Naturalism and Social Science: A Post-Empiricist Philosophy of Social Science, Cambridge University Press.
