This essay starts with a brief review of some of the main approaches to power, and identifies four: ‘power to’, ‘power over’, ‘power/storage’ and ‘power discretion’. It argues that these are all viable, but that they should be linked to a fifth — that of ‘power/effects' — with its stress on the continued performance of social relations. But how are such relations stabilised? It is argued, in answer to this question, that social relations are never purely social in character: rather they are heterogeneous, being embodied in a series of corporeal, textual, natural and technical materials. Finally, certain strategies for ordering these relations and their power effects are examined for the case of a formal organisation, and it is argued that such strategies are always, and necessarily, discursively impure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnesBarry, (1986), ‘On Authority and its Relationship to Power’, pp. 180–95 in Law(ed.), 1986a.
2.
BarnesBarry, (1988), The Nature of Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.
3.
BenigerJames R., (1986), The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society, Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press.
4.
BijkerWiebe E.HughesThomas P.PinchTrevor (1987), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology of History and Technology, Cambridge, Mass., and London: MIT Press.
5.
BourdieuPierre, (1980), ‘The Production of Belief: Contribution to an Economy of Symbolic Goods’, Media, Culture and Society, 2:261–303.
6.
CallonMichel, (1980), ‘Struggles and Negotiations to Define What Is Problematic and What is Not: The Socio-Logic of Translation’, pp. 197–219 in KnorrK.D.KrohnR.WhitleyR., (eds), The Social Process of Scientific Investigation: Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 4, Dordrecht: Reidel.
7.
CallonMichel, (1986), ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay’, pp. 196–233 in Law(ed.), 1986a.
8.
CallonMichelLatourBruno, (1981), ‘Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So’, pp. 277–303 in Knorr-CetinaCicourel (eds), 1981.
9.
CleggStewart R., (1989), Frameworks of Power, London: Sage.
10.
DouglasMary, (1973), Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
11.
DreyfusHubert L.RabinowPaul, (1982), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, with an Afterword by Michel Foucault, Brighton: Harvester.
12.
EisensteinElizabeth L., (1980), The Printing Press as an Agent of Social Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FoucaultMichel, (1979), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
14.
FoucaultMichel, (1981), The History of Sexuality: Volume I: An Introduction, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
15.
FoucaultMichel, (1982), ‘The Subject and Power’, pp. 208–26 in DreyfusRabinow, 1982.
16.
FyfeGordonLawJohn (eds), (1988), Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, Sociological Review Monograph 35, London: Routledge.
17.
GarfinkelHarold, (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
GiddensAnthony, (1979), Central Problems in Social Theory: Action Structure and Contradiction in Social Theory, London: Macmillan.
19.
GiddensAnthony, (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
GoodyJack, (1977), The Domestication of the Savage Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HarawayDonna, (1990), ‘A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s’, pp. 190–233 in Nicholson (ed.), 1990.
22.
HindessBarry, (1986), ‘Actors and Social Relations’, pp. 113–26 in TurnerWardell, 1986.
23.
HughesThomas P., (1983), Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
KeatRussell, (1991), ‘Introduction: Starship Britain or Universal Enterprise’, pp. 1–17 in KeatAbercrombie (eds), 1991.
KnightsD.MorganG., (1990), ‘The Concept of Strategy in Sociology: A Note of Dissent’, Sociology, 24:475–83.
27.
Knorr-CetinaKarin D.CicourelAaron V., (1981), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro Sociologies, Boston: Routledge.
28.
Knorr-CetinaKarin D.MulkayMichael J., (1983), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, London, Beverly Hills, New Delhi: Sage.
29.
LatourBruno, (1983), ‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World’, pp. 141–70 in Knorr-CetinaMulkay, 1983.
30.
LatourBruno, (1986a), ‘Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands’, Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, 6:1–40.
31.
LatourBruno, (1986b), ‘The Powers of Association’, pp. 264–80 in Law (ed.), 1986a.
32.
LatourBruno, (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
33.
LatourBruno, (1988), The Pasteurization of France, translated by SheridanAlanLawJohn, Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press.
34.
LatourBrunoWoolgarSteve, (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Beverly Hills and London: Sage.
35.
LaveJean, (1986), ‘The Values of Quantification’, pp. 88–111 in Law (ed.), 1986a.
36.
LawJohn, (1986a), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, Sociological Review Monograph 32, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
37.
LawJohn, (1986b), ‘On Power and Its Tactics: A View from the Sociology of Science’, The Sociological Review, 34:1–38.
38.
LawJohn, (1987), ‘On the Social Explanation of Technical Change: The Case of the Portuguese Maritime Expansion’, Technology and Culture, 28(2): 227–52.
39.
LawJohn, (1992), ‘The Olympus 320 Engine: A Case Study in Design, Autonomy and Organisational Control’, Technology and Culture, forthcoming.
40.
LeeHermione, (1990), ‘Power: Women and the World’, pp. 110–17 in RicksMichaels, 1990.
41.
LukesSteven, (1974), Power: A Radical View, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
42.
McGawJudith A., (1985), ‘Accounting for Innovation: Technological Change and Business Practice in the Berkshire County Paper Industry’, Technology and Culture, 26:703–25.
43.
MacKenzieDonald, (1990), Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance, Cambridge, Mass., and London: MIT Press.
44.
MainesDavid, (1991), Social Organization and Social Processes: Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss, New York: Aldine de Gruyter, in press.
45.
MarxKarl, (1946), Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production, London: Allen & Unwin.
46.
NicholsonLinda J. (ed.), (1990), Feminism/Postmodernism, New York and London: Routledge.
47.
OngWalter, (1982), Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, London: Methuen.
48.
ParsonsTalcott, (1967), Sociological Theory and Modem Society, New York: Free Press.
49.
PinchTrevor J.BijkerWiebe E., (1987), ‘The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other’, pp. 17–50 in BijkerHughesPinch, 1987.
50.
RicksChristopherMichaelsLeonard, (1990), The State of the Language, London and Boston: Faber.
51.
ShapinSteven, (1989), ‘The Invisible Technician’, American Scientist, 77:554–63.
52.
StarSusan Leigh, (1991), ‘The Sociology of the Invisible: The Primacy of Work in the Writings of Anselm Strauss’, forthcoming in Maines (1991).
53.
TurnerS.WardellJ., (1986), Sociological Theory in Transition, London: Allen & Unwin.
54.
WeberMax, (1978), Economy and Society, edited by RothGuentherWittichClaus, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: California University Press.
55.
WinnerLangdon, (1986a), ‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?’; in Winner (1986b).
56.
WinnerLangdon, (1986b), The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in the Age of High Technology, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
