AkrichMadeleine, (1991), ‘The De-Scription of Technical Objects’, in BijkerLaw (eds) (1991), forthcoming.
2.
BarnesBarry, (1977), Interests and the Growth of Knowledge, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
3.
BellabyPaul, (1991), ‘Histories of Sickness: Making Use of Multiple Accounts of the Same Process’, pp. 20–42 in Dex (ed.) (1991).
4.
BenhabibSeyla, (1990), ‘Epistemologies of Postmodernism: A Rejoinder to Jean-Francois Lyotard’, pp. 107–30 in Nicholson (ed.) (1990).
5.
BijkerWiebe E.HughesThomas P.PinchTrevor J. (eds), (1987), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., and London: MIT Press.
6.
BijkerWiebe E.LawJohn (eds), (1991), Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Mass., and London: MIT Press.
7.
BlaunerRobert, (1964), Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry, Chicago, Chicago University Press.
8.
BowkerGeof, (1987), ‘A Well Ordered Reality: Aspects of the Development of Schlumberger’, Social Studies of Science, 17: 611–55.
9.
BravermanHarry, (1974), Labor and Monopoly Capital, London: Monthly Review Press.
10.
BurnsTomStalkerG.M. (1961), The Management of Innovation, London: Tavistock.
11.
CallonMichel, (1980), ‘Struggles and Negotiations to Define What is Problematic and What is Not: The Sociologic of Translation’, pp. 197–219 in KnorrKrohnWhitley (eds) (1980).
12.
CallonMichel, (1986), ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’, pp. 196–233 in Law (ed.) (1986a).
13.
CallonMichelLatourBruno, (1981), ‘Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macrostructure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So’, pp. 277–303 in Knorr-CetinaCicourel (eds) (1981).
14.
CleggStewart, (1989), Frameworks of Power, London, Beverly Hills and New Delhi: Sage.
15.
CockburnCynthia, (1983), Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change, London: Pluto.
16.
CohenJ.M.CohenM.J., (1971), The Penguin Dictionary of Modern Quotations, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
17.
CollinsH.M., (1985), Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, London, Beverly Hills and New Delhi: Sage.
18.
ConnorSteven, (1989), Postmodernist Culture: An Introduction to Theories of the Contemporary, Oxford and Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
19.
DavidPaulBunnJulie Ann, (1988), ‘The Economics of Gateway Technologies and Network Evolution: Lessons from Electricity Supply History’, Information Economics and Policy, 3: 165–202.
20.
DelamontSara, (1987), ‘Three Blind Spots? A Comment on the Sociology of Science by a Puzzled Outsider’, Social Studies of Science, 17: 163–70.
21.
DexShirley (ed.), (1991), Life and Work History Analyses: Qualitative and Quantitative Developments, Sociological Review Monograph 37, London: Routledge.
22.
DouglasMaryIsherwoodBaron, (1978), The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption, London: Allen Lane.
23.
FeyerabendPaul K., (1975), Against Method, London: New Left Books.
24.
KellerEvelyn Fox, (1988), ‘Feminist Perspectives in Science Studies’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 13: 235–49.
25.
FujimuraJoan, (1987), ‘Constructing Doable Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment’, Social Studies of Science, 17: 257–93.
26.
FujimuraJoan, (1991), ‘On Methods, Ontologies and Representation in the Sociology of Science: Where do we Stand?’, in Maines (ed.) (1991), in press.
27.
GiddensAnthony, (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
GiddensAnthony, (1985), The Nation State and Violence, Cambridge: Polity Press.
29.
HackerSally L., (1990), ‘Doing It the Hard Way’ Investigations of Gender and Technology, Boston: Unwin Hyman.
30.
HarawayDonna, (1990), ‘A Manifesto For Cyborgs: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s’, pp. 190–233 in Nicholson (ed.) (1990).
31.
HardingSandra, (1986), The Science Question in Feminism, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
32.
HardingSandra, (1990), ‘Feminism, Science, and the Anti-Enlightenment Critiques’, pp. 83–106 in Nicholson (ed.) (1990).
33.
HughesThomas P., (1983), Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
KnorrKarin D.KrohnRogerWhitleyRichard D. (eds), (1980), The Social Processes of Scientific Innovation, Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.
35.
Knorr-CetinaKarin D.CicourelAaron V. (eds), (1981), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro Sociologies, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
36.
KuhnThomas S., (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
37.
LakatosImreMusgraveAlan, (1970), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LatourBruno, (1986), ‘The Powers of Association’, pp. 264–80 in Law (ed.) (1986a).
39.
LatourBruno, (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Engineers and Scientists Through Society, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
40.
LatourBruno, (1988), The Pasteurization of France, Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press.
41.
LatourBruno, (1991a), ‘Where are the Missing Masses? Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts’, in BijkerLaw (eds) (1991), forthcoming.
42.
LatourBruno, (1991b), Aramis or the Love of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.
43.
LaveJean, (1976) ‘The Values of Quantification’, pp. 88–111 in Law (ed.) (1986a).
44.
LawJohn, (ed.), (1986a), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, Sociological Review Monograph 32, London: Routledge.
45.
LawJohn, (1986b), ‘On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation, and the Portuguese Route to India’, pp. 234–63 in Law (ed.) (1986a).
46.
LawJohn, (1987), ‘Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of the Portuguese Expansion’, pp. 111–34 in BijkerHughesPinch (eds) (1987).
47.
LawJohnCallonMichel, (1988), ‘Engineering and Sociology in a Military Aircraft Project: A Network Analysis of Technical Change’, Social Problems, 35: 284–97.
48.
LyotardJean-Francois, (1986), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester: University of Manchester.
49.
MacKenzieDonald, (1984), ‘Marx and the Machine’, Technology and Culture, 25: 473–502.
50.
MacKenzieDonaldWajcmanJudy, (1985a), ‘Introduction’, pp. 2–25 in MacKenzieWajcman (eds) (1985b).
51.
MacKenzieDonaldWajcmanJudy (eds), (1985b), The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator Got Its Hum, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
52.
McNeilWilliam H., (1983), The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force and Society Since A.D. 1000, Oxford: Blackwell.
53.
MainesDavid (ed.), (1991), Social Organization and Social Process: Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss, Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
54.
MannMichael, (1986), The Source of Social Power: Volume 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NicholsonLinda J. (ed.), (1990), Feminism/Postmodernism, New York and London: Routledge.
57.
NobleDavid F., (1977), America by Design: Science, Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
PerrowCharles, (1988), Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies, New York: Basic Books.
59.
PosterMark, (1990), The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context, Cambridge: Polity Press.
60.
RortyRichard, (1991a), Objectivity, Relativism and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
RortyRichard, (1991b), ‘Cosmopolitanism without Emancipation: A Response to Jean-Francois Lyotard’, pp. 211–22 in Rorty (1991a).
62.
RoseHilaryRoseSteven (eds), (1976), The Political Economy of Science: Ideology of/in the Natural Sciences, London: Macmillan.
63.
CowanRuth Schwarz, (1983), More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave, New York: Basic Books.
64.
ShapinStevenSchafferSimon, (1985), Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
65.
StarSusan Leigh, (1988), ‘Introduction: The Sociology of Science and Technology’, Social Problems, 35: 197–205.
66.
StarSusan Leigh, (1989), Regions of the Mind: Brain Research and the Quest for Scientific Certainty, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
67.
StarSusan Leigh, (1991), ‘The Sociology of the Invisible: The Primacy of Work in the Writings of Anselm Strauss’, in Maines (ed.) (1991), forthcoming.
68.
StarSusan LeighGriesemerJames R., (1989), ‘Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39’, Social Studies of Science, 19: 387–420.
69.
TraweekSharon, (1988a), Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists, Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press.
70.
TraweekSharon, (1988b), “‘Feminist Perspectives in Science Studies”: Commentary’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 13: 250–53.
71.
WoodwardJoan, (1965), Industrial Organization: Behaviour and Control, London: Oxford University Press.
72.
WoolgarSteve, (1985), ‘Why Not a Sociology of Machines? The Case of Sociology and Artificial Intelligence’, Sociology, 19: 557–72.
73.
WoolgarSteve, (1988), Science: The Very Idea, Chichester: Ellis Horwood; London and New York: Tavistock.