AckerS. (1980), ‘Women, the other academics’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1, 1.
2.
BatesonN. (1984), Data Construction in Social Surveys, London: Allen and Unwin.
3.
BrymanA. (1984), ‘The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology’, British Journal of Sociology, 35, 1. March, pp. 75–92.
4.
BulmerM. (1988), ‘A comment on: The relation of theory and method: Causal relatedness, historical contingency and beyond’, Sociological Review, 36. 3, Aug., pp. 470–3.
5.
CainM.FinchJ. (1981), ‘Towards a rehabilitation of data’, in AbramsP., (eds), Practice and Progress: British Sociology 1950–1980.
6.
CourtenayG. (1988), ‘Collaborating on survey research projects’, Network, no. 41, May.
7.
LayderD. (1988), ‘The relation of theory and method: Causal relatedness, historical contingency and beyond’, Sociological Review, 36, 3, Aug. pp. 441–63.
8.
PlattJ. (1976), Realities of Social Research, Sussex University Press.
9.
PlattJ. (1986), ‘Functionalism and the survey: The relation of theory and method”, Sociological Review, 34, 3, Aug., pp. 501–36.
10.
SmithD. (1987), The Everyday World as Problematic, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
