This paper critically scrutinizes the thesis put forward by Jennifer Platt in a recent article in The Sociological Review about the general relation between theory and method, based on her investigation of the specific example of functionalism and survey research in post-war US sociology. The present paper questions the extent to which Platt's analysis and general conclusions mask important levels of connectedness between theory and method.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BentonTed, (1977), The Philosophical Foundations of the Three Sociologies, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2.
BhaskarRoy, (1979), The Possibility of Naturalism, Brighton, Harvester.
3.
BlumerHerbert, (1956), ‘Sociological Analysis and the Variable’, American Sociological Review, XXI, pp. 683–90.
4.
BlumerHerbert, (1969), Symbolic Interactionism, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
5.
BohmDavid, (1981), Wholeness and the Implicate Order, London, Ark.
6.
CicourelAaron, (1964), Method and Measurement in Sociology, New York, Free Press.
