Based on data gathered in settings where the family side of personal troubles is a regular concern, it is argued that the family enters into social relations as a collective representation. Adapting Durkheim's usage to everyday life, the family is analyzed as a ‘public’ project of those whose domestic affairs are challenged for consideration of family order. Three features of the family project are considered: (1) the awareness of the social form, (2) family conduct in the large, (3) family usage. As an object of experience, the family presents itself in a category separate and distinct from its members, while at the same time being a practical, discursive construct built out of, as well as reflecting concrete domestic affairs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellahR.N., ‘Introduction’, 1973, in BellahR.N., Emile Durkheim on Morality and Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
2.
BergerP.L.KellnerH.1970, ‘Marriage and the construction of reality’, in DreitzelH.P., Recent Sociology No. 2, Macmillan, New York.
3.
BergerP.L.LuckmannT.1966, The Social Construction of Reality, Doubleday, New York.
4.
BernardesJ.1984, ‘Do we really know what “The Family” is? in CloseP.CollinsR., Family and Economy in Modem Society, Macmillan, London.
BernardesJ., “Doing things with words”: Sociology and “family policy” debates’, Sociological Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 679–702.
7.
BernardesJ., Founding the new “family studies”’, Sociological Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 57–86.
8.
DurkheimE., 1961 [1912], The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, Macmillan, New York.
9.
DurkheimE., 1964 [1894], The Rules of Sociological Method, Free Press, New York.
10.
GarfinkelH., 1967, Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
11.
GlazeB., 1982, ‘A never-ending funeral; one family's struggle, Generations, Vol. 7. pp. 42 & 52.
12.
GubriumJ.F., 1986, Oldtimers and Alzheimer's: The Descriptive Organization of Senility, JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.
13.
GubriumJ.F., 1987a, ‘Organizational embeddedness and family life’, in BrubakerT., Aging, Health and Family: Long-Term Care, Sage, Newbury Park, California.
14.
GubriumJ.F., 1987b, ‘Structuring and destructuring the course of illness: The Alzheimer's disease experience’, Sociology of Heath and Illness, Vol. 9, pp. 1–24.
15.
GubriumJ.F., 1988. Analyzing Field Reality, Sage, Newbury Park, California.
16.
GubriumJ.F.BuckholdtD.R., 1977, Toward Maturity: The Social Processing of Human Development, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
17.
GubriumJ.F.BuckholdtD.R., 1982a, Describing Care: Image and Practice in Rehabilitation, Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, Boston.
18.
GubriumJ.F.BuckholdtD. R., 1982b, ‘Fictive family: Everyday usage, analytic, and human service considerations’, American Anthropologist, Vol, 84, pp. 878–85.
19.
GubriumJ.F.HolsteinJ.A., 1987, ‘Experiential location and method in family studies,’Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 773–786.
20.
GubriumJ.F.LynottR.J., 1985a, ‘Alzheimer's disease as biographical work’, in PetersonW.A.QuadagnoJ., Social Bonds in Later Life, Sage, Beverly Hills, California.
21.
GubriumJ.F.LynottR.J., 1985b, ‘Family rhetoric as social order’, Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 6, pp. 129–52.
22.
GubriumJ.F.LynottR.J., 1987, ‘Measurement and the interpretation of burden in the Alzheimer's disease experience’, Journal of Aging Studies, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 265–285.
23.
KatzD.StotlandE., 1959, ‘A preliminary statement to a theory of attitude structure and change’, in KochS., Psychology: A Study of a Science (Vol. 3), McGraw-Hill, New York.
24.
KrechD.CrutchfieldR.S.BallacheyE.L., 1962, Individual in Society, McGraw-Hill, New York.
25.
Kübler-RossE., 1964, On Death and Dying, Macmillan, New York, 1969.
26.
LaingR.D.EstersonA., 1964, Sanity, Madness and the Family, Penguin, New York.
27.
LaschC., 1977, Haven in a Heartless World, Basic Books, New York.
28.
LynottR.J., 1983, ‘Alzheimer's disease and institutionalization: The ongoing construction of a decision’, Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 4, pp. 559–74.
29.
MillsC.W., 1959, The Sociological Imagination, Oxford University Press, New York.
30.
New York Times, 1986, ‘A broad approach wins bitter fight on state of the union’, January 28, pp. 1 & 9.
31.
SchutzA., 1970, On Phenomenology and Social Relations, edited by WagnerHelmut R., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
32.
SilvermanD., 1985, Qualitative Methodology and Sociology, Gower, Hampshire, UK.
33.
SilvermanD., 1987, Communication and Medical Practice, Sage, Newbury Park, California.
34.
ThorneB., 1982, ‘Feminist rethinking of the family: An overview in ThorneB.YalomM., Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions, Longmans, New York.
