This paper examines whether ‘aesthetic’ considerations play a part in contemporary scientific work, and focuses on a scientific field undergoing rapid transformation through the introduction of digital imaging and image processing technologies. Interviews with astronomers at two image processing laboratories indicate that they orient explicitly to the ‘aesthetic’ judgments of their audiences when preparing images to promote and popularize their research. Although they acknowledge no such ‘aesthetic’ pretensions for their ‘scientific’ work, further analysis shows that a more ancient aesthetic, that of perfecting nature through a crafting of resemblances, is deeply a part of routine image processing work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlpersSvetlana (1983), The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the 17th Century, University of Chicago Press.
2.
AmannKlausKnorr-CetinaK. (1988), ‘The fixation of visual evidence,’Human Studies, 11(2–3).
3.
AmelioGilbert F. (1974), ‘Charge-coupled devices’, Scientific American, 230(2): 399.
4.
BarnesS. B. (1974), Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
5.
BaxesGregory (1984), Digital Image Processing: A Practical Primer, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall.
6.
BloorDavid (1976), Knowledge and Social Imagery, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
7.
CavellStanley (1986), ‘Observations on art and science’, Daedalus, 115(3): 171–7.
8.
CollinsHarry (1985), Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, London, Sage.
9.
EdgeDavidMulkayMichael (1976), Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain, New York, Wiley.
10.
EdgertonSamuel (1976), The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective, New York, Harper & Row.
11.
EdgertonSamuel (1984), ‘Galileo, Florentine disegno, and the ‘Strange Spottednesse’ of the moon’, Art Journal. 44, 3.
12.
EdgertonSamuel (1985), ‘The function of artistic form in the study of the stars’, Celestial Images: Astronomical Charts from 1500 to 1900, Catalogue of an Exhibition, Boston University Art Gallery, January 23–March 25.
13.
EdgertonSamuel (1986a), ‘The Renaissance development of the scientific illustration’, in ShirleyJ.HoenigerD., (eds), Science and the Arts in the Renaissance: A Symposium at the Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington D.C.
14.
EdgertonSamuel (1986b), ‘Observations on art and science’, Daedalus, 115(3): 182–6.
15.
GadamerHans-Georg (1984), Truth and Method, New York, Crossroad Publishing Company.
16.
GarfinkelHarold (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall.
17.
GarfinkelHaroldLynchMichaelLivingstonEric (1981), ‘The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11: 131–58.
18.
GiedionSigfried (1948), Mechanization Takes Command, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
19.
GombrichE.H. (1963), Meditations on a Hobby Horse and Other Essays on the Theory of Art, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
20.
GoodingDavid (1986), ‘How do scientists reach agreement about novel observations?’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 17.
21.
GraubardS. R. (1986), ‘Preface’ to Art and Science, special issue of Daedalus, 115(3), v–xvii.
22.
GregoryR. L. (1966), Eye and Brain. London: World University Library.
23.
HendersonLinda Dalrymple (1983), The Fourth Dimension and Non-Euclidian Geometry in Modern Art, Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press.
24.
HirshRichard F. (1983), Glimpsing the Invisible Universe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
25.
IvinsWilliam (1953), Prints and Visual Communication, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
26.
JamesickJ.BloukeB. (1987), ‘Sky on a chip: The fabulous CCD’, Sky and Telescope, 74(3): 238–42.
27.
Knorr-CetinaKarin (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge, Oxford, Pergamon Press.
28.
KuhnThomas (1977), ‘Comment on the relation of science and art’, pp. 340–51 of The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
LatourBrunoWoolgarSteve (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, London, Sage.
30.
LatourBruno (1986), ‘Visualisation and cognition’, Knowledge and Society, 6: 1–40.
31.
LatourBrunoDe NobletteJ. (eds) (1985), Les Vues de L'Esprit, special issue of Culture Technique, 14.
32.
LynchMichael (1985a), Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
33.
LynchMichael (1985b), ‘Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility’, Social Studies of Science, 15 (1).
34.
LynchMichael (1985c), ‘Aesthetic horizons of scientific observation,’ paper presented at The Uses of Experiment: A Conference on Experimentation in the Natural Sciences, Newton Park, Bath, England (Aug. 31–Sept. 2).
35.
LynchMichaelLivingstonEricGarfinkelHarold (1983), ‘Temporal order in laboratory work’, in CetinaK. KnorrMulkayM. (eds), Science Observed, London, Sage.
36.
LynchMichaelWoolgarSteve (eds) (1988), Representation in Scientific Work, special issue of Human Studies, 11(2–3).
37.
MulkayMichael (1979), Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London, George Allen and Unwin.
38.
RosenfeldAzrielKakA. C. (1982), Digital Picture Processing, Volume One, New York, Academic Press.
39.
RudwickMartin J. S. (1976), ‘The emergence of a visual language for geological science 1760–1840’, History of Science, 14: 149–95.
40.
SewardFrederickGorensteinPaulTuckerW. H. (1985), ‘Young Supernova Remnants’, Scientific American, 252(2): 88–96.
41.
ShapinSteven (1984), ‘Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's literary technology’, Social Studies of Science, 14: 481–521.
42.
SteinbergLeo (1986), ‘Art and science: Do they need to be yoked?’Daedalus, 115(3): 1–16.
43.
SulenticJack W.LorreJ. J. (1984), ‘The magic of image processing’, Sky and Telescope (May): 407–11.
44.
TillingLaura (1975), ‘Early experimental graphs’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 8.
45.
TufteEdward R. (1983), The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Cheshire, Conn., Graphics Press.
46.
VitzPaulGlimcherArnold (1984), Modern Art and Modern Science A Parallel Analysis of Vision, New York, Praeger.
47.
WaddingtonC. H. (1970), Behind Appearance, Cambridge, MIT Press.
YoungAndrew T. (1985), ‘What color is the solar system?’Sky and Telescope (May): 399.
50.
YoxenEdward (1987), ‘Seeing with sound: A study of the development of medical images’, in BijkerW. E.HughesT. P.PinchT. J. (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge, MA, the MIT Press.
