Abstract
This paper develops a typology of four different models of discipline that operate in the workplace. These models are derived from a systematic analysis of the literature using a framework developed by criminologists for examining crime and criminal justice systems. The analysis focuses on each model's views of human nature, social order, rule creation, crime and deviance, disciplinary procedure and philosophy of sanctioning. The analysis highlights the important role played by organizational structure in shaping disciplinary form. The implications of the typology are discussed for current debates about the character of an all-pervasive societal discipline. It is concluded that current unitary visions of such discipline as ‘instrumental’ should be modified in the light of the pluralism implied by the typological analysis.
Instead of being a homogeneous expanse of dense growth extending thousands of miles, as it appears from the air, the jungle is actually a composite of as many as 200 different kinds of forests packed tightly together. Each forest is composed of its own species of trees and plants. These forest types are primarily based on soil types or drainage types, which actually influence the type of soil. Once you get away from that perception of all green, then you can see a diversity of habitats right there in the jungle. (The Washington Post, March 22, 1985)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
