BarnesJ. A. (1958), Social anthropology: Theory and practice: Inaugural lecture at Sydney University, in Arts: The Proceedings of the Sydney University Arts Association.
2.
BarnesJ. A. (1960), ‘Intensive studies of small communities’, in Meanjin: A Quarterly of Literative Art Discussion, 19:201–3.
3.
BeckerH. S. (1968), ‘Social observation and case studies’, in SillsDavid L. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, New. York: The Macmillan Company and the Free Press: vol.11: 232–8.
4.
BeveridgeW. I. B. (1950), The Art of Scientific Investigation, London: Heinemann.
5.
BurgessE. W. (1927), ‘Statistics and case studies as methods of sociological research’, Sociology and Social Research12: 103–20.
6.
BurgessT. W. (1945), ‘Sociological research methods’, American Journal of Sociology50: 474–82.
7.
ChassanJ. B. (1960), ‘Statistical inference and the single case in clinical design’, Psychiatry23: 173–84.
8.
CooleyC. H. (1930), ‘The case study of small institutions as a method of research’, in Sociological Theory and Social Research, New York, Henry Holt & Co: 313–22.
9.
EcksteinH. (1970), ‘Case study and theory in political science’, in GreensteinF.PolsbyN. (eds), The Handbook of Political Science: Strategies of Inquiry, London: Addison-Wesley: vol.7: 79–137.
10.
EldridgeS. (1935), ‘Textbooks, Teachers and Students’, American Journal of Sociology40: 637–45.
11.
ForemanPaul (1948) ‘The theory of case studies’, Social Forces, 26:408–19.
12.
GarbettG. Kingsley (1970), ‘The analysis of social situations’, Man5: 214–27.
13.
GluckmanM. (1958), The Analysis of a Social Situation in Modern Zululand, Rhodes-Livingstone Paper no. 28, Manchester Manchester University Press for Rhodes-Livingstone Institute.
14.
GluckmanM. (1961), ‘Ethnographic Data in British social anthropology’, Sociological Review9: 5–17.
15.
GluckmanM. (ed.) (1964), Closed Systems and Open Minds: The Limits of Naivety in Social Anthropology, London: Oliver & Boyd
16.
GluckmanM. (1967), ‘Introduction’ in EpsteinA. W. (ed.), The Craft of Social Anthropology, London: Tavistock: i–xxiv
17.
GoodeWilliam J.HanPaul K. (1952), Methods in Social Research, New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
HamiltonDavid (1980), ‘Some contrasting assumptions about case study research and survey analysis’, in SimonH. (ed.), Towards a Science of the Singular: Essays about Case Study in Educational Research and Evaluation, Care Occasional Publications no. 10, Norwich, Centre for Applied Research in Education: 78–92.
19.
HerkelR. E.MorrisonD.E. (eds) (1970), The Significance Test Controversy, London: Butterworth.
20.
HotellingH.SorokinP. (1943), ‘The prediction of personal adjustment: A symposium’, American Journal of Sociology48: 61–86.
21.
JocherK. (1928), ‘The case study method in social research’, Social Forces7: 512–15.
22.
JonassenC.T. (1949), ‘A re-evaluation and critique of the logic and some methods of Shaw and McKay’, American Sociological Review14: 608–14.
23.
KaplanA. (1964), The Conduct of Enquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science, San Francisco: Chandler.
24.
KomarovskyM.WallerW. (1945), ‘Studies of the family’, American Journal of Sociology50: 443–51.
25.
LewisOscar (1950), ‘An anthropological approach to family studies’, American Journal of Sociology55: 468–75.
26.
LindesmithA. R. (1952), ‘Comments on W. S. Robinson's “The logical structure of analytical induction”’American Sociological Review17: 492–3.
27.
LykkenDavid (1970), ‘Statistical significance in psychological research’, in HenkelR. E.MorrisonD. E. (eds), The Significance Test Controversy: 267–279.
28.
MadgeJohn (1953), The Tools of Social Science, London: Longmans, Green & Co.
29.
MitchellJ. Clyde, (1956), The Yao Village, Manchester University Press for the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute.
30.
Oxford (1979), The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, 3rd edn, Oxford University Press.
31.
QueenS. (1928), ‘Round table on the case study in sociological research’Publications of the American Sociological Society. 22.
RobinsonW. S. (1952), ‘Rejoinder to comments on “The logical structure of Analytical Induction”’American Sociological Review17: 494.
34.
SarbinT. R. (1943), ‘A contribution to the study of actuarial and individual methods of prediction’, American Journal of Sociology48: 593–602.
35.
ShawClifford (1927), ‘Case study method’, Publications of the American Sociological Society. 21: 149–57.
36.
SimonsHelen (ed.), (1980), Towards a Science of the Singular: Essays about Case Study in Education Research and Evaluation, Care Occasional Publications no. 10, Norwich: Centre for Applied Research in Education.
37.
StakeRobert E. (1980), ‘The case study method in social enquiry’, in SimonH. (ed.), Towards a Science of the Singular: Essays about Case Study in Educational Research and Evaluation, Care Occasional Publications no. 10, Norwich, Centre for Applied Research in Education: 64–75.
38.
TurnerRalph H. (1953), ‘The quest for universals in sociological research’, American Sociological Review24: 605–11.
39.
TurnerV. W. (1957), Schism and Continuity in an African Society, Manchester University Press for the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute.
40.
van VelsenJ. (1967), ‘The extended case method and situational analysis’, in EpsteinA. L. (ed), The Craft of Social Anthropology, London: Tavistock: 129–49.
41.
WallerWillard (1935), ‘Insight and scientific method’American Journal of Sociology285–97.
42.
WeinbergS. Kirston (1952), ‘Comment on W.S. Robinson's ‘The logical structure of analytical induction’, American Sociological Review17: 493–4.
43.
YoungPauline (1939), ‘The Case Study Method’, in Scientific Social Surveys and Research, New York: Prentice Hall: Ch. X, 226–54.
44.
ZnanieckiFlorian (1934), The Method of Sociology, New York: Rinehart.