Many proposed methods for analyzing clustered ordinal data focus on the regression model and consider the association structure within a cluster as a nuisance. However, the association structure is often of equal interest—for example, temporal association in longitudinal studies and association between responses to similar questions in a survey. We discuss the use, appropriateness, and interpretability of various latent variable and Markov models for the association structure and propose a new structure that exploits the ordinality of the response. The models are illustrated with a study concerning opinions regarding government spending and an analysis of stability and change in teenage marijuana use over time, where we reveal different behavioral patterns for boys and girls through a comprehensive investigation of individual response profiles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgrestiA.1999. “Modelling Ordered Categorical Data: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.”Statistics in Medicine18:2191–207.
2.
AgrestiA.BoothJ. G.HobertJ. P.CaffoB.2000. “Random-Effects Modeling of Categorical Response Data.” Pp. 27–81 in Sociological Methodology, vol. 30, edited by SobelMichael E.BeckerMark P.Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishing Inc.
3.
AgrestiA.NatarajanR.2001. “Modeling Clustered Ordered Categorical Data: A Survey.”International Statistical Review69:345–71.
4.
DaviesH. T. O.CrombieI. K.TavakoliM.1998. “When Can Odds Ratios Mislead?”British Medical Journal316:989–91.
5.
DeeksJ. J.BrackenM. B.SinclairJ. C.DaviesH. T. O.TavakoliM.CrombieI. K.1998. “Letter to the Editor: When Can Odds Ratios Mislead?”, British Medical Journal317:1155.
6.
EkholmA.SmithP. W. F.McDonaldJ. W.1995. “Marginal Regression Analysis of a Multivariate Binary Response.”Biometrika82:847–54.
7.
EkholmA.McDonaldJ. W.SmithP. W. F.2000. “Association Models for a Multivariate Binary Response.”Biometrics56:712–18.
8.
EkholmA.2003. “Comparing the Odds and the Dependence Ratios.” Pp. 13–25 in Statistics, Econometrics, and Society: Essays in Honour of Leif Nordberg, edited by HöglundR.JänttiM.RosenqvistG.Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
9.
EkholmA.JokinenJ.McDonaldJ. W.SmithP. W. F.2003. “Joint Regression and Association Modelling for Longitudinal Ordinal Data.”Biometrics59:795–803.
10.
ElliottD. S.AgetonS. S.HuizingaD.KnowlesB. A.CanterR. J.1983. “The Prevalence and Incidence of Delinquent Behavior: 1976–1980.”National Youth Survey, Project Report No. 26, Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute.
GlonekG. F. V.McCullaghP.1995. “Multivariate Logistic Models.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57:533–46.
13.
GreenlandS.1987. “Interpretation and Choice of Effect Measures in Epidemiologic Analyses.”Americal Journal of Epidemiology125:761–68.
14.
HallW.JohnstonL. D.DonnellyN.1999. “Epidemiology of Cannabis Use and Its Consequences.” Pp. 71–125 in The Health Effects of Cannabis, edited by KalantH.CorrigallW.HallW. et.al. Toronto: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.
15.
HartzelJ.AgrestiA.CaffoB.2001. “Multinomial Logit Random Effects Models.”Statistical Modelling1:81–102.
16.
HoutM.DuncanO. D.SobelM. E.1987. “Association and Heterogeneity: Structural Models of Similarities and Differences.” Pp. 145–84 in Sociological Methodology, vol. 17, edited by CloggC. C.Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
17.
JokinenJ.2006. “Fast Estimation Algorithm for Likelihood-based Analysis of Repeated Categorical Responses.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, in press.
18.
JohnstonL. D.O'MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.2000. Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–1999.Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
19.
LangJ. B.AgrestiA.1994. “Simultaneously Modeling Joint and Marginal Distributions of Multivariate Categorical Responses.”Journal of the American Statistical Association89:625–32.
20.
LangJ. B.McDonaldJ. W.SmithP. W. F.1999. “Association-Marginal Modeling of Multivariate Categorical Responses: A Maximum-Likelihood Approach.”Journal of the American Statistical Association94:1161–71.
21.
LiangK. Y.ZegerS. L.1986. “Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models.”Biometrika73:13–22.
22.
LindseyJ. K.1999. Models for Repeated Measurements.2d ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
LindseyP. J.KaufmannJ.2004. “Analysis of a Longitudinal Ordinal Response Clinical Trial Using Dynamic Models.”Applied Statistics53:523–37.
24.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B.2002. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data.2d ed.New York: Wiley.
25.
R Development Core Team. 2006. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.”Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing (http://www.r-project.org).
26.
SackettD. L.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G.1996. “Down with Odds Ratios!”Evidence-Based Medicine1:164–66.
27.
VermuntJ. K.RodrigoM. F.Ato-GarciaM.2001. “Modeling Joint and Marginal Distributions in the Analysis of Categorical Panel Data.”Sociological Methods and Research30:170–96.
28.
VermuntJ. K.HagenaarsJ. A.2004. “Ordinal Longitudinal Data Analysis.” Pp. 374–93 in Methods in Human Growth Research, edited by HauspieR. C.CameronN.MolinariL.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
