Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Stereotypes can influence social perceptions in many ways. The current research examined a previously unexplored possibility—that activation of a stereotype can validate thoughts about other people when the thoughts are stereotype consistent (i.e., that stereotype activation can increase people's confidence in their previous stereotype-consistent thoughts). Given previous results for other forms of metacognition, this thought validation from stereotype activation should be most likely when people have the cognitive capacity to carefully process individuating information. In two experiments, participants were given information about a target person and then a description designed to activate a stereotype. When processing capacity was high, confidence in thoughts was greater when the initial information produced thoughts consistent, rather than inconsistent, with the stereotype that was later activated, and higher confidence in thoughts was associated with stronger perception-consistent recommendations related to the target. When processing capacity was low, an activated stereotype served its familiar heuristic role in judgment, and thought confidence played no role in judgment-related recommendations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barden

Petty

R.E.

(2008). The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 489–509.

Bodenhausen

G.V.

(1988). Stereotype biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726–737.

Bodenhausen

G.V.

(1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variation in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1, 319–322.

Bodenhausen

G.V.

Macrae

C.N.

Sherman

J.W.

(1999). On the dialectics of discrimination: Dual processes in social stereotyping. In Chaiken

Trope

(Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 271–290). New York: Guilford Press.

Briñol

Petty

R.E.

(2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1123–1139.

Briñol

Petty

R.E.

(2009). Persuasion: Insights from the self-validation hypothesis. In Zanna

M.P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 69–118). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Campbell

D.T.

Fiske

D.W.

(1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

Fiedler

Walther

(2003). Stereotyping as inductive hypothesis testing. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

Fiske

S.T.

Neuberg

S.L.

(1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In Zanna

M.P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). New York: Academic Press.

10.

Gilbert

D.T.

Hixon

J.G.

(1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509–517.

11.

Heider

(1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

12.

Kunda

Sherman-Williams

(1993). Stereotypes and the construal of individuating information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 90–99.

13.

Nisbett

R.E.

Ross

L.D.

(1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

14.

Petty

R.E.

Briñol

Tormala

Z.L.

(2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722–741.

15.

Petty

R.E.

Briñol

Tormala

Z.L.

Wegener

D.T.

(2007). The role of metacognition in social judgment. In Kruglanski

A.W.

Higgins

E.T.

(Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 254–284). New York: Guilford.

16.

Preacher

K.J.

Hayes

A.F.

(2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.

17.

Shrout

P.E.

Bolger

(2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.

18.

Skowronski

J.J.

Carlston

D.E.

(1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689–699.

19.

Tormala

Z.L.

Briñol

Petty

R.E.

(2007). Multiple roles for source credibility under high elaboration: It's all in the timing. Social Cognition, 25, 536–552.

20.

Wegener

D.T.

Clark

J.K.

Petty

R.E.

(2006). Not all stereotyping is created equal: Differential consequences of thoughtful versus non-thoughtful stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 42–59.

21.

Wegener

D.T.

Downing

Krosnick

J.A.

Petty

R.E.

(1995). Measures and manipulations of strength-related properties of attitudes: Current practice and future directions. In Petty

R.E.

Krosnick

J.A.

(Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 455–487). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Discovering That the Shoe Fits

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References