Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Many studies have established that 2-month-old infants have knowledge of solid objects' basic physical properties. Evidence about infants' understanding of nonsolid substances, however, is relatively sparse and equivocal. We present two experiments demonstrating that 5-month-old infants have distinct expectations for how solids and liquids behave. Experiment 1 showed that infants use the motion cues from the surface of a contained liquid or solid to predict whether it will pour or tumble from a cup if the cup is upended. Experiment 2 extended these findings to show that motion cues lead to distinct expectations about whether a new object will pass through or remain on top of a substance. Together, these experiments demonstrate that 5-month-old infants are able to use movement cues and solidity to discriminate a liquid from an object of similar appearance, providing the earliest evidence that infants can reason about nonsolid substances.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguiar

Baillargeon

(1999). 2.5-month-old infants' reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 116–157.

Baillargeon

(1995). A model of physical reasoning in infancy. In Rovee-Collier

Lipsitt

L.P.

Hayne

(Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 9, pp. 306–352). Westport, CT: Ablex.

Chiang

W.-C.

Wynn

(2000). Infants' tracking of objects and collections. Cognition, 77, 169–195.

Clearfield

M.W.

Mix

K.S.

(2001). Amount versus number: Infants' use of area and contour length to discriminate small sets. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2, 243–260.

Cordes

Brannon

E.M.

(2008). The difficulties of representing continuous extent in infancy: Using numbers is just easier. Child Development, 79, 476–489.

Feigenson

Carey

Spelke

E.S.

(2002). Infants' discrimination of number vs. continuous extent. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 33–66.

Gao

Levine

S.C.

Huttenlocher

(2000). What do infants know about continuous quantity? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 20–29.

Hayes

P.J.

(1988). Naive physics I: Ontology for liquids. In Collins

A.M.

Smith

E.E.

(Eds.), Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 251–269). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Hespos

S.J.

Baillargeon

(2001a). Infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: A surprising discrepancy. Psychological Science, 12, 141–147.

10.

Hespos

S.J.

Baillargeon

(2001b). Reasoning about containment events in very young infants. Cognition, 78, 207–245.

11.

Hespos

S.J.

Dora

Rips

L.J.

Christie

(2008). Infants make quantity discriminations for substances. Manuscript submitted for publication.

12.

Hespos

S.J.

Spelke

E.S.

(2004). Conceptual precursors to language. Nature, 430, 453–456.

13.

Huntley-Fenner

Carey

Solimando

(2002). Objects are individuals but stuff doesn't count: Perceived rigidity and cohesiveness influence infants' representations of small groups of discrete entities. Cognition, 85, 203–221.

14.

Imai

Mazuka

(2007). Language-relative construal of individuation constrained by universal ontology: Revisiting language universals and linguistic relativity. Cognitive Science, 31, 385–413.

15.

Kahneman

Treisman

Gibbs

B.J.

(1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175–219.

16.

Needham

Baillargeon

(1993). Intuitions about support in 4.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 47, 121–148.

17.

Pinto

J.P.

(1996). Xhab: Experimental control software for MS-DOS (Version 6.5) [Computer software]. Palo Alto, CA: Author.

18.

Pylyshyn

(2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition, 80, 127–158.

19.

Soja

N.N.

Carey

Spelke

E.S.

(1991). Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38, 179–211.

20.

Spelke

E.S.

(1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14, 29–56.

21.

vanMarle

(2004). Infants' understanding of number: The relationship between discrete and continuous quantity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

22.

Wang

S.H.

Baillargeon

Paterson

(2005). Detecting continuity violations in infancy: A new account and new evidence from covering and tube events. Cognition, 95, 129–173.

Five-Month-Old Infants Have Different Expectations for Solids and Liquids

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References