BarghJ.A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 361–382). New York: Guilford.
2.
BrewerM.B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In WyerR.S.Jr.SrullT.K. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
FiskeS.T.NeubergS.L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In ZannaM.P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1–74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4.
MacraeC.N.BodenhausenG.V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120.
5.
RuleN.O.AmbadyN. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1100–1105.
6.
RuleN.O.AmbadyN.AdamsR.B.Jr.MacraeC.N. (2007). Us and them: Memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 687–692.
7.
RuleN.O.AmbadyN.AdamsR.B.Jr.MacraeC.N. (2008). Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1019–1028.
