This experiment investigated potential gender biases in the emergence of leadership in groups. Teams played a public-goods game under conditions of intra- or intergroup competition. We predicted and found a strong preference for female leaders during intragroup competition and male leaders during intergroup competition. Furthermore, during intragroup competition, a female leader was more instrumental than a male leader in raising group investments, but this pattern was reversed during intergroup competition. These findings suggest that particular group threats elicit specific gender-biased leader prototypes. We speculate about the evolutionary and cultural origins of these sex differences in the emergence of leadership.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderR.D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. London: Aldine.
2.
BassB.M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
3.
BaumeisterR.F.SommerK.L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and the two spheres of belongingness. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 38–44.
4.
BennisW. (2007). The challenges of leadership in the modern world. American Psychologist, 62, 2–5.
5.
BrownD. (1991). Human universals. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
6.
BrowneK. (2007). Co-ed combat: The new evidence that women should not fight the nation's wars. New York: Penguin.
7.
BussD.M.SchmittD.P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: A theory of human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
8.
ChagnonN.A. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239, 985–992.
9.
De GrootG.Peniston-BirdC. (2000). A soldier and a woman. New York: Longman.
10.
De WaalF. (2006). Our inner ape. London: Granta Books.
11.
EaglyA.H.JohnsonB.T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.
12.
EaglyA.H.KarauS.J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 685–710.
13.
GearyD.C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. New York: American Psychological Association.
14.
GoldsteinJ. (2003). War and gender. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GoodallJ. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
KeeganJ. (1994). A history of warfare. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Key Porter Books.
17.
LittleA.C.BurrissR.P.JonesB.C.RobertsS.C. (2007). Facial appearance affects voting decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 18–27.
18.
LordR.G.FotiR.J.DeVaderC.L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343–378.
19.
SilkJ.B. (2007). The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362, 539–559.
20.
SimpsonJ.A.KenrickD.T. (1997). Evolutionary social psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
TaylorS.E.KleinL.C.LewisB.P.GruenewaldR.A.R. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 413–429.
22.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (1988). The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations(Institute for Evolutionary Studies, Technical Report No. 88-1). Santa Barbara: University of California.
23.
Van VugtM. (2006). Evolutionary origin of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 354–371.
24.
Van VugtM.De CremerD. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: Social identification effects on collective actions in public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587–599.
25.
Van VugtM.De CremerD.JanssenD.P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18, 19–23.
26.
Van VugtM.HoganR.KaiserR.B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63, 182–196.
27.
WranghamR.PetersonD. (1996). Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. London: Bloomsbury.
