We describe a new method, based on indirect measures of implicit autobiographical memory, that allows evaluation of which of two contrasting autobiographical events (e.g., crimes) is true for a given individual. Participants were requested to classify sentences describing possible autobiographical events by pressing one of two response keys. Responses were faster when sentences related to truly autobiographical events shared the same response key with other sentences reporting true events and slower when sentences related to truly autobiographical events shared the same response key with sentences reporting false events. This method has possible application in forensic settings and as a lie-detection technique.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Academy Symposium. (2007, Spring). Is there science underlying truth detection?Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, LX, 6–7.
2.
Ben-ShakharG.ElaadE. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131–151.
3.
ColeM.W.SchneiderW. (2007). The cognitive control network: Integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions. NeuroImage, 37, 343–360.
4.
CrovitzH.F.SchiffmanH. (1974). Frequency of episodic memories as a function of their age. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 517–518.
5.
FiedlerK.BluemkeM. (2005). Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Test. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 307–316.
6.
GanisG.KosslynS.M.StoseS.ThompsonW.L.Yurgelun-ToddD.A. (2003). Neural correlates of different types of deception. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 830–836.
7.
GrayN.S.BrownA.S.MacCullochM.J.SmithJ.SnowdenR.J. (2005). An implicit test of the associations between children and sex in pedophiles. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 304–308.
8.
GrayN.S.MacCullochM.J.SmithJ.MorrisM.SnowdenR.J. (2003). Violence viewed by psychopathic murderers. Nature, 423, 497–498.
9.
GreenwaldA.G.McGheeD.E.SchwarzJ.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
10.
GreenwaldA.G.NosekB.A.BanajiM.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
11.
GreggA.I. (2007). When vying reveals lying: The Timed Antagonistic Response Alethiometer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 621–647.
12.
HontsC.R.RaskinD.C.KircherJ.C. (1994). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 252–259.
13.
IaconoW.G.LykkenD.T. (1999). Update: The scientific status of research on polygraph techniques: The case against polygraph tests. In FaigmanD.L.KayeD.H.SaksM.J.SandersJ. (Eds.), Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony (pp. 174–184). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
14.
KimD.Y. (2003). Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 83–96.
15.
LanglebenD.D.LougheadJ.W.BilkerW.B.RuparelK.ChildressA.R.BuschS.I.GurR.C. (2005). Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 26, 262–272.
16.
LykkenD.T. (1960). The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 258–262.
17.
LykkenD.T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: The uses and abuses of the lie detector. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
18.
MooreH.M.PetrieC.V.BragaA.A. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
19.
SartoriG.AgostaS.GnoatoF. (2007, October). High accuracy detection of malingered whiplash syndrome. Paper presented at the International Whiplash Trauma Congress, Miami, FL.
20.
SteffensM.C. (2004). Is the Implicit Association Test immune to faking?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 165–179.
21.
SwetsJ.A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285–1293.
22.
WolpeP.R.FosterK.R.LanglebenD.D. (2005). Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promises and perils. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5(2), 39–49.
