In three studies, we explored the existence of an evolved sensitivity to the peak that would be consistent with the evolutionary origins of many basic human preferences. Activating the evolved motive of mating activates related adaptive mechanisms, including a general sensitivity to cues of growth and decay associated with determining mate value in human courtship. These studies show that priming the mating goal also activates an evaluative bias that influences how people evaluate cues of growth. Specifically, living kinds that are immature or past their prime are devalued, whereas living kinds that are at their peak become increasingly valued. Study 1 establishes this goal-driven effect for human stimuli indirectly related to the mating goal. Studies 2 and 3 establish that the evaluative bias produced by the activated mating goal extends to living kinds, but not artifacts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarghJ.A.ChartrandT.L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. InReisH.T.JuddC.M.(Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BarghJ.A.GreenM.FitzsimonsG.M. (in press). The selfish goal: Unintended consequences of intended goal pursuit. Social Cognition.
3.
BarghJ.A.HuangJ.Y.(in press). The selfish goal. InMoskowitzG.GrantH.(Eds.), Goals. New York: Guilford.
4.
BarrettH.C.KurzbanR. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628–647.
5.
BurnsR. (1897). A red, red rose. InHenleyW.E.HendersonT.F.(Eds.), Burns's complete poetical works (p. 250). Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press. (Original work published 1794)
6.
CampbellD.T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. InSchilppP.A.(Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (pp. 413–463). La Salle, IL: Open Court.
7.
CaramazzaA.MahonB.Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: The evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 354–360.
8.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. InBarkowJ.H.CosmidesL.ToobyJ.(Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
DijksterhuisA.AartsH. (2003). On wildebeests and humans: The preferential detection of negative stimuli. Psychological Science, 14, 14–18.
10.
GangestadS.SimpsonJ. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.
11.
GriskeviciusV.CialdiniR.B.KenrickD.T. (2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 63–76.
12.
GriskeviciusV.GoldsteinN.J.MortensenC.R.CialdiniR.B.KenrickD.T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 281–294.
13.
HigginsE.T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. InHigginsE.T.KruglanskiA.W.(Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford Press.
14.
InagakiK.HatanoG. (2003). Young children's naive thinking about the biological world. New York: Psychology Press.
15.
KatzD. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.
16.
KenrickD.T.GabrielidisC.KeefeR.C.CorneliusJ.S. (1996). Adolescents' age preferences for dating partners: Support for an evolutionary model of life-history strategies. Child Development, 67, 1499–1511.
17.
KenrickD.T.KeefeR.C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.
18.
KruglanskiA.W.ShahJ.Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR.ChunW.Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). A theory of goal systems. InZannaM.P.(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331–378). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
KunkelK.E.RuthT.K.PletscherD.H.HornockerM.G. (1999). Winter prey selection by wolves and cougars in and near Glacier National Park, Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 901–908.
20.
ManerJ.K.KenrickD.T.BeckerD.V.RobertsonT.E.HoferB.NeubergS.L., (2005). Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 63–78.
21.
McCullochK.D.FergusonM.J.KawadaC.BarghJ.A.(in press). Taking a closer look: On the operation of nonconscious impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
22.
MedinD.L.AtranS. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111, 960–983.
23.
NeubergS.L.KenrickD.T.ManerJ.K.SchallerM. (2004). From evolved motives to everyday mentation: Evolution, goals, and cognition. InForgasJ.P.WilliamsK.D.(Eds.), Social motivation: Conscious and unconscious processes (pp. 133–152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
NewJ.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 16598–16603.
25.
ÖhmanA.MinekaS. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522.
26.
RoneyJ.R. (2003). Effects of visual exposure to the opposite sex: Cognitive aspects of mate attraction in human males. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 393–404.
27.
SenateM. (2001). See Jane date. Don Mills, Ontario, Canada: Red Dress Ink.
28.
ShepardR.N. (1992). The perceptual organization of colors: An adaptation to regularities of the terrestrial world?InBarkowJ.H.CosmidesL.ToobyJ.(Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 495–532). New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
SymonsD. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. InAbramsonP.R.PinkertonS.D.(Eds.), Sexual nature/sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
