Control over interference is a pervasive feature of cognitive life. Central to research on interference control has been the identification of its underlying mechanisms. Investigations have focused on processes that filter out distracting perceptual information, leading to negative priming, and processes that discard intruding memories that cause proactive interference. Theories differ regarding whether or not a single process during episodic retrieval underlies both negative priming and the resolution of proactive interference. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we combined both phenomena into a single paradigm and found that occipital cortex shows activation uniquely related to negative priming, whereas activation increases in left lateral prefrontal cortex are uniquely associated with proactive interference. This pattern of results contradicts theories that rely on a single process to account for both phenomena. However, results also showed common recruitment of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and parietal regions and therefore suggest that some control processes are shared.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AronA.R. (2007). The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. The Neuroscientist, 13, 214–228.
BissettP.G.NeeD.E.JonidesJ. (2008). Overcoming interference in memory and responding. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4.
BuchsbaumM.S.SomeyaT.TengC.Y.AbelL.ChinS.NajafiA., (1996). PET and MRI of the thalamus in never-medicated patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 191–199.
5.
DempsterF.N. (1995). Interference and inhibition in cognition. New York: Academic Press.
6.
DiamondA.GilbertJ. (1989). Development as progressive inhibitory control of action: Retrieval of a contiguous object. Cognitive Development, 4, 223–249.
7.
EgnerT.HirschJ. (2005). Where memory meets attention: Neural substrates of negative priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1774–1784.
8.
EnrightS.J.BeechA.R. (1993). Further evidence of reduced cognitive inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 387–395.
9.
FormanS.D.CohenJ.D.FitzgeraldM.EddyW.F.MintunM.A.NollD.C. (1995). Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): Use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 33, 636–647.
10.
FoxE. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 145–173.
11.
FriedmanN.P.MiyakeA. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135.
12.
GorfeinD.S.MacLeodC.M. (2007). Inhibition in cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
HarnishfegerK.K. (1995). The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence. InDempsterF.N.BrainerdC.J.(Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 175–204). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14.
HasherL.ZacksR.T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. InBowerG.H.(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). New York: Academic Press.
15.
JenkinsonM.BannisterP.BradyM.SmithS. (2002). Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage, 17, 825–841.
JonidesJ.NeeD.E. (2006). Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 181–193.
18.
JonidesJ.SmithE.E.MarshuetzC.KoeppeR.A. (1998). Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 8410–8413.
19.
JoormannJ. (2005). Inhibition, rumination and mood regulation in depression. InEngleR.W.SedekG.von HeckerU.McIntoshD.N.(Eds.), Cognitive limitations in aging and psychopathology: Attention, working memory, and executive functions (pp. 275–312). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
KaneM.J.BleckleyM.ConwayA.EngleR. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169–183.
21.
KemetherE.M.BuchsbaumM.S.ByneW.HazlettE.A.HaznedarM.BrickmanA.M., (2003). Magnetic resonance imaging of mediodorsal, pulvinar, and centromedian nuclei of the thalamus in patients with schizophrenia. Archives in General Psychiatry, 60, 983–991.
22.
KornblumS.HasbroucqT.OsmanA. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis of stimulus-response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.
23.
LazarN.A.EddyW.F.GenoveseC.R.WellingJ. (2001). Statistical issues in fMRI for brain imaging. International Statistical Review, 69, 105–127.
24.
LundT.E.NorgaardM.D.RostrupE.RoweJ.B.PaulsonO.B. (2005). Motion or activity: Their role in intra- and inter-subject variation in fMRI. NeuroImage, 26, 960–964.
25.
MacLeodC.M.DoddM.D.SheardE.D.WilsonD.E.BibiU. (2003). In opposition to inhibition. InRossB.(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 163–214). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Science.
26.
MacQueenG.M.GalwayT.GoldbergJ.O.TipperS.P. (2003). Impaired distractor inhibition in patients with schizophrenia on a negative priming task. Psychological Medicine, 33, 121–129.
27.
MayC.P.KaneM.J.HasherL. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35–54.
28.
NeeD.E.JonidesJ.BermanM.G. (2007). Neural mechanisms of proactive interference-resolution. NeuroImage, 38, 740–751.
29.
NiggJ.T. (2001). Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder?Psychological Bulletin, 127, 571–598.
30.
OppenheimA.V.SchaferR.W.BuckJ.R. (1999). Discrete-time signal processing (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
PolineJ.B.WorsleyK.J.EvansA.C.FristonK.J. (1997). Combining spatial extent and peak intensity to test for activations in functional imaging. NeuroImage, 5, 83–96.
32.
PostleB.R.BergerJ.S.D'EspositoM. (1999). Functional neuroanatomical double dissociation of mnemonic and executive control processes contributing to working memory performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96, 12959–12964.
33.
SmithR. (1992). Inhibition: History and meaning in the sciences of mind and brain. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
SmithS.M.JenkinsonM.WoolrichM.W.BeckmannC.F.BehrensT.E.J.Johansen-BergH., (2004). Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage, 23, S208–S219.
35.
TipperS.P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321–343.
36.
WagnerA.D.ShannonB.J.KahnI.BucknerR.L. (2005). Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 445–453.
37.
ZhangJ.X.FengC.M.FoxP.T.GaoJ.H.TanL.H. (2004). Is left inferior frontal gyrus a general mechanism for selection?NeuroImage, 23, 596–603.
38.
ZhangJ.X.LeungH.C.JohnsonM.K. (2003). Frontal activations associated with accessing and evaluating information in working memory: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 20, 1531–1539.
