GlickP.FiskeS.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
2.
GlickP.FiskeS.T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.
3.
GlickP.FiskeS.T.MladinicA.SaizJ.L.AbramsD.MasserB., (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
4.
HoffmanC.HurstN. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197–208.
5.
JackmanM.R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
JostJ.T.BanajiM.R.NosekB.A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–920.
7.
JostJ.T.KayA.C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.
8.
KayA.C.JostJ.T.MandisodzaA.N.ShermanS.J.PetrocelliJ.V.JohnsonA.L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. InZannaM.P.(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 305–358). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
KayA.C.JostJ.T.YoungS. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240–246.
10.
VescioT.K.GervaisS.J.SnyderM.HooverA. (2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658–672.
